Karan Puri Miranda vs. Arizona (1966) In Miranda v. Arizona (1966)‚ the Supreme Court ruled that detained criminal suspects‚ prior to police questioning‚ must be informed of their constitutional right to an attorney and against self-incrimination. The case began with the 1963 arrest of Phoenix resident Ernesto Miranda‚ who was charged with rape‚ kidnapping‚ and robbery. Miranda was not informed of his rights prior to the police interrogation. During the two-hour interrogation‚ Miranda allegedly
Premium Supreme Court of the United States President of the United States Richard Nixon
slavery into the Western territories threatened to tear the nation apart.With Congress sharply divided‚ reflecting the divisions in the nation‚ the Supreme Court took the unusual step of hearing the case of a fugitive slave suing for his freedom. Intended to be the definitive ruling that would settle the controversy threatening the Union for good‚ the case instead produced a divisive decision that pushed the nation one step closer toward the precipice of civil war. John Marshall‚ in his time the single
Premium First Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution
The facts of the case 18 States and the Justice Department brought suit against Microsoft to "eliminate Microsoft’s unlawful practices‚ to avoid recurrence of similar practices and to restore the competitive threat that middleware products posed prior to Microsoft’s unlawful conduct. The procedural history of the case Microsoft grew the government’s attention in 1991‚ because word was that it was abusing its monopoly in the PC operating system market. The government had the FTC conduct an inquiry
Premium United States President of the United States Supreme Court of the United States
proposed law or court case The court case that is being reviewed is Women’s Health Protection Act of 2017. The Intentions of this case is to "protect a women’s right and ability to determine whether and when to bear a child or end a pregnancy by limiting restrictions on the provision of abortion services." (Chu‚ J. 2017) Abortion is defined as "the deliberate termination of a human pregnancy‚ most often performed during the first 28 weeks or first trimester of pregnancy". the Supreme court ruled in
Premium Roe v. Wade Pregnancy Abortion
WILFREDO M. CATU‚ complainant vs. ATTY. VICENTE G. RELLOSA‚ respondent A.C. No. 5738 (February 19‚ 2008) This is an administrative case filed by the complainant claiming that the respondent committed an act of impropriety as a lawyer and as public officer when he stood as counsel for the defendants despite the fact that he presided over the conciliation proceedings between the litigants as punong barangay.. Facts: Complainant Wilfredo M. Catu is a co-owner of a lot and the building erected thereon
Premium Lawyer Law
The sonoma county court system uses diversion services for its first time juvenile offenders for certain crimes. This diversion program starts before any trial begins and after the case is analyzed to see if it qualifies. These are a lot of drug and theft cases that juveniles in the community are guilty of. The court hands the defendants to the Probation Department. The offender has multiple factors that must be included to qualify for the program. If the individual does qualify they are put on
Premium Crime Criminology Juvenile delinquency
After I carefully viewed the website on Florida Court Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)‚ I was so amazed by the information I comprehended and gathered. With that being said‚ wow‚ I feel kind of novice because I was not at all aware of the federal and state laws that exist in Florida. The California website is easy to read and interpret: it explains arbitration nicely and succinctly (courts‚ 2016). Unfortunately‚ Florida and California web layout are designed differently; I feel Florida has
Premium United States Law United States Constitution
Roughly 10 years ago a court case was introduced to sue McDonald’s Corporation for knowingly selling defective products. The particulars of the case involved a woman spilling hot coffee on her-self and being injured very badly because of it. Public opinion was (and largely still is) strongly against the woman and her settlement. Her stepson wrote an article to argue that she was justified in receiving a settlement due to the defective nature of the product being sold. The claim being presented
Premium Law Tort Tort law
And in sixty-four years‚ several different races have had the opportunity to enroll and earn degrees from Louisiana State University‚ including myself. However‚ this was not always the case. There was a point in time where blacks and whites could not attend the same school‚ or even use the same facilities. The court decision that made separate facilities legal‚ was Plessy v Ferguson. It allowed for separate areas for blacks and whites‚ which forced blacks to create their facilities‚ like Historically
Premium Plessy v. Ferguson Black people African American
discussed. Obergefell V. Hodges is the court case that talks about gay marriage. Many are against the topic‚ but maybe they should open their minds a little more and accept that love is love. Though many know of the court case‚ not all people know the history of it. The part that many know is that the people were gay‚ lesbian‚ and so on‚ and most people also know that they were fighting for the right to marry. What too many people do not know is that even though court Justices were against it‚ the majority
Premium Homosexuality Same-sex marriage Marriage