Descartes and Plato Explain both of descartes Arguments for the existence of God Descartes proof of God’s existence comes from his third meditation and is based on three ideas. He argues that innate idea exists within us‚ the fictitious or invented ideas are a result of our own imagination and adventitious ideas result from our experiences in the world. Descartes said‚ the idea of God is innate and cannot be invented. Descartes presents some arguments that lead to his conclusion. The first
Premium Ontology Existence Metaphysics
Plato‚ the father of philosophy‚ was a rationalist. He was the first systematic metaphysician and epistemologist. He believed that we had innate knowledge; a priori. So to him learning was only a matter of remembering. Plato believed that the “ideal” world existed beyond our own physical earth because according to him realty could not be changing or imperfect. From his point of view what we see are only the particulars‚ the mimics of the real thing‚ therefore‚ we have to pull back from the world
Premium Plato Philosophy Epistemology
Philosophical thinker‚ Plato‚ believed in human nature and that one had to be able to understand human nature in order to live life to the best of one’s ability. Plato believed in metaphysics- principles that are real- and epistemology- the study of theories of knowledge that justify beliefs from opinions. Furthermore‚ Plato believed in using literary devices to explain his views‚ which lead to one of his most famous thoughts‚ the allegory of the cave- in which Plato tells Socrates’s story of prisoners
Premium Plato Philosophy Epistemology
Immanuel Kant and Transcendental Idealism David Hume shook the foundations of Epistemology and once again left philosophers baffled with where to turn next. The choices were either to agree with Descartes’ rationalism and accept solipsism or an appeal to a loving God‚ agree with Locke’s style of empiricism‚ Berkeley’s Epistemological approach‚ or simply concede that Hume’s extreme skepticism and ultimately solipsist view of knowledge was the most accurate. However‚ Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) was
Premium Immanuel Kant Empiricism Philosophy
study of ideas about knowledge‚ truth‚ the nature and meaning of life‚ etc.” The different branches are Metaphysics‚ which deal with questions like‚ what is being? What are its fundamental features and properties is there a god? Another branch is Epistemology which is the theory of knowledge is the branch of philosophy concerned with these questions: what is the nature of knowledge‚ and what are its criteria‚ sources and limits. Another branch is Moral Philosophy also known as Ethics and the philosophical
Premium Philosophy Epistemology Logic
How do I know what I know? Question 1: Which main questions‚ concepts‚ and theories of epistemology are dealt with by your selected philosopher? As a rationalist‚ Plato challenges inquiries of “what we know how we know” by centralizing the human mind (conscience and thought) as the essence of knowledge. Plato often debates using his deceased mentor‚ Socrates‚ to honour Socrates’ reputation as a valuable teacher. True knowledge can be rediscovered deep within the mind; otherwise known as
Premium Mind Epistemology Philosophy
Chapter 1-Historical Studies: Some Issues -historiography‚ great-person theory‚ historical development approach (zeitgeist) -presentism vs. historicism‚ internists (old)‚ historians (new) -1960s history of psychology -rationalists‚ empiricists‚ epistemology‚ nativism‚ mechanism‚ vitalism‚ active mind‚ passive mind‚ materialists‚ idealists‚ monist -dualism: interactionism‚ Emergentism‚ Epiphenominism‚ psychophysical parallelism‚ double aspectism -determinism: physical‚ psychical‚ indeterminism‚ Nondeterminism
Premium Metaphysics John Stuart Mill Epistemology
In his Two Dogmas of Empiricism‚ Quine addresses what he views as problematic claims made by Carnap. The first problem Quine has with Carnap’s epistemology is about his definition of state-descriptions. The problem is in two parts: first Quine says that Carnap’s version of analyticity is conditional‚ because it requires atomic sentences in a language to be mutually independent. The second part of the problem is that‚ Carnap’s attempt to explore analyticity by way of his state-descriptions results
Premium Logic Philosophy Empiricism
construction. Weaver‚ and Olson.(2006). Table 1 illustrate theses differences between these philosophical paradigms. Realism and Antirealism Realism has an ontology which states that the structures creating the world cannot be directly observed. Its epistemology is that appearances do not necessarily reveal the mechanisms which cause these appearances‚ and its methodology therefore involves the construction of theories which can account for these appearances. Wainwright‚S.( 1997).Realism‚ in the Aristotelian
Premium Scientific method Epistemology Philosophy
Gonzalez‚ Sophie Period 6 December 3‚ 2012 Dorothy and the Tree: A Lesson in Epistemology Stanley Fish discusses how we in society base our lives off of assumptions. Using the example of Dorothy and the tree‚ Fish is able to show how with our assumptions‚ we as people categorize others and things into what we believe to be correct. Whether or not we have actually taken the time to figure out if we are right is irrelevant. He notes that we should just “keep trying to expand our sense of ‘us’
Premium Humanities Concept Semantics