LAW 209 FINAL EXAM MAY 18‚ 2012. PROF. URIEL INSTRUCTIONS: THIS EXAM IS DUE TO ME NO LATER THAN 11:59 PM ON MAY 22‚ 2012. THE EXAM IS OPEN BOOK‚ BUT YOU MAY NOT COLLABORATE WITH ANY OTHER STUDENT. THE CHAPTERS TESTED ARE SEVEN THROUGH 13. YOU ARE REMINDED TO INCLUDE ANY EXTRA CREDIT AT THE END OF THE EXAM. WRITE YOUR ANSWERS AS A SEPARATE DOCUMENT AND EMAIL THEM TO ME AT JURIEL@JJAY.CUNY.EDU QUESTION 1: Albert has long wanted to smoke Cuban and Nicaraguan cigars. Believing that it is illegal
Premium Murder Criminal law Assault
ACL REFERENCE MUST BE USED In Ferguson v Walkley (2008) 17 VR 647‚ Harper J said (at [1])‚ “The principles of democratic governance have had difficulty in accommodating laws designed to deal with offensive behaviour — with which I include offensive language.” Later in that same case‚ Harper J observed (at [5])‚ “According to Professors Bronitt and McSherry‚ “[c]riminalising offensive language or conduct has the potential to interfere with the freedom of expression‚ assembly and association protected
Premium Law Human rights Crime
Running head: Compare and Contrast Civil with Criminal injuries Compare and Contrast Civil with Criminal injuries Nora Kelgin October 19‚ 2013 Tort Actions A tort actions is a form of civil law‚ which are intentional tort‚ torts of negligence‚ and strict liability torts‚ the vast majority of legal issues in the United State involve this‚ such as divorce‚ child custody‚ child support‚ domestic dispute‚ consumer problems‚ defamation‚ and injuries due to a person
Premium Crime Criminal justice Criminal law
Amanda Prieto Bus 233-004LY Criminal Law Essay 10/14/11 Obligations and Rights As what I have read‚ the obligations and rights in reference to criminal law‚ every case is different. The most common cases when defending oneself against a criminal charge are “I didn’t do it” and “I did it but I shouldn’t be held responsible.” In one of the defenses of a criminal charge‚ there is one topic where people are innocent until proven guilty. It is an actual presumption where the judge and jury assume
Premium Law Jury Criminal law
Shapley | Civil Law v. Criminal Law | Introduction to Criminal Law | Joanna Solis 3/2/2012 | Only a few people actually know “the law”. Others think that the criminal justice system is a body that only has one set of rules and laws and all act the same. Not to mention that because of television they think that every case is tried at criminal court with a judge and a panel of jurors. However that is not the case because there’s two specifically types of law‚ civil and criminal law. Though both
Premium Criminal law Law Crime
Introduction Criminal law is much better known to laymen than civil law‚ as a result of journalists’ reports of famous criminal trials. In talking with people about law‚ I find that they often misapply principles from criminal law to situations in civil (e.g.‚ tort) law‚ which results in their misunderstanding. They are surprised when they learn the actual legal principles that apply to a problem. The purpose of this essay is to compare and contrast criminal afnd civil law. In civil law‚ a private
Free Criminal law Law Tort
CHAPTER 7 – CRIMINAL LAW 7.1 Introduction The term criminal law‚ sometimes called penal law‚ refers to various rules whose common characteristic is the imposition of punishment if one fails to comply with the rules. In criminal law‚ a crime is considered as a wrong against the State. A crime may be defined as an unlawful act or an omission which is unacceptable that causes public condemnation in a form of sanction. Therefore‚ a crime is a wrong which affects the public welfare‚ a wrong for which
Premium Criminal law
Many people have heard about the insanity defense in different famous cases where it has come up and been used. The insanity defense is a compromise between society and the law‚ meaning that society believes that criminals shouldn ’t be punished if they are mentally incapable of controlling their conduct. There is a lot of controversy with the insanity defense‚ like questions such as what is the different if an insane person killed someone and if a sane person killed someone‚ the person is still
Premium Insanity defense Mental disorder Insanity
LAW DEPARTMENT A2 Criminal Law Study Pack 2010 / 2011 Name CONTENTS PAGE 1. Homicide - Murder 3 2. Voluntary Manslaughter 8 3. Involuntary Manslaughter 20 4. Defences: Insanity 29 5. Automatism 32 6. Intoxication 35 7. Self-defence 37 8. Consent 42 9. Critical evaluation of murder and voluntary manslaughter 47 10. Critical
Free Criminal law Manslaughter
relating to the doctrine of recent complaint (S. 275)‚ sexual reputation is not allowed to challenge credibility (S. 277)‚ rape shield law (S. 276) S. 276 was challenged in Seaboyer and Gayme as being too narrow and exceptions were changed S. 265(4) introduced mistaken belief in consent Challenged in Osolin‚ found it was simply a codification of the common law mistake of fact. 1992 – Bill C-49 This was Parliaments response to Seaboyer and Gayme. (1) Replaced old S. 276 with new provisions
Premium Human sexual behavior Rape Criminal law