Axia College Material Appendix G Peer Review Checklist* What is the main point of this paper? Whether video games are good or bad for people‚ and how popular this industry really is. What is the greatest strength of this paper? I enjoyed the way the author has all of his research in such great order. His numbers and statistics help explain what he/she is writing about. The graphs are also very informative. The author studied the subject very well. What material does not seem to
Premium Writing English-language films Research
PEER REVIEW OF PRACTICALS Student: Checked by: Teacher: Practical Name: |What to look for |Tick if correct | |Every page must be numbered‚ have the student’s name and IB student number. | | |The Practical MUST be in the correct format‚ typed and contain ALL the headings as in the example.
Premium Error Data Typeface
Peer Observation Record Candidate (Print Name) ……………………………………………………. Student Assessor (Print Name) ……………………………….. Date ……………………………….. Topic being presented ………………………….. Assessment Criteria Comments Contents (what they are saying) Did it make sense and did it flow? Was the content well researched? Was the introduction appropriate? Did it have a beginning‚ middle and end? Did you think it was well prepared
Premium Debut albums Communication English-language films
Axia College Material Appendix G Peer Review Checklist* |What is the main point of this paper? | | | | | | |The main point of this paper is to inform the audience about gun control. | |
Premium Peer review Firearm Gun politics
Peer Review Worksheet Your Name Writer’s Name: Read the essay completely once. Then‚ read it again taking all of the following into consideration. Be honest‚ constructive‚ and appropriate in your comments Read objectively Do not offer comments like “Cool‚” Great‚” “I liked it‚” or anything else that does not include a scholarly explanation or justification for the comment Feedback is important‚ especially at this critical first stage Help your classmate think outside the box; does what you
Premium Writing Pleading Lawsuit
Running head: CASE STUDY SUMMARY Summary: "Read-Only Participants: A Case for Student Communication in Online Classes" In 2009‚ L. Nagel‚ A.S. Blignaut‚ and J.C. Cronje developed a case study to show the importance of quantity and quality of participation in an online classroom. The case study was composed of 22 graduate level students at the University of Pretoria ranging in ages 30 to 50. Weekly‚ topics were researched and students were to participate in online discussions
Premium Community Education Virtual community
In science explain the necessity for peer-review and why sometimes there is resistance to new scientific theories. What is scientific peer review? Scientific peer review is the evaluation of scientific research findings or proposals for competence‚ significance and originality‚ by qualified experts who research and submit work for publication in the same field (peers). Most commonly‚ peer review is used by the editors of scientific journals‚ who ask well-qualified experts to provide written
Premium Scientific method Science Peer review
Peer review is a process used to evaluate articles submitted to prestigious academic journals. Experts in the field read a peer-reviewed article‚ this experts informs the editors of the journal whether or not the article is free from error‚ original and meaningful and help decide if it is worth printing. Peer-reviewed articles are an important part of keeping up with current trends and research in any academic field (McGuffin‚ 2009). Scholarly journals are mainly published articles that have been
Premium Scientific method Academic publishing Peer review
ethnography project tips and tools and how to complete a successful peer review. I can apply this new knowledge in several ways. First‚ I can apply my new knowledge of summarizing to the next module because one of the assignment is writing a summary‚ In addition several of my previous summaries‚ lacked analysis and in-depth speculation; therefore‚ I will not just retell the story but I will make sure to include some speculation and analysis. I also had some difficulty with MLA due to the fact that I have
Premium Writing Essay Learning
Critique #1 December 2012 Scharfstein‚ L.‚ Alfano‚ C.‚ Beidel‚ D.‚ & Wong‚ N. (2011). Children with generalized anxiety disorder do not have peer problems‚ just fewer friends. Child Psychiatry and Human Development‚ 42‚712-723. doi: 10.1007/s10578-011-0245-2 Article Critique of "Children with Generalized Anxiety Disorders Do Not Have Peer Problems‚ Just Fewer Friends" Summary Lindsay Scharfstein is one of the authors of this article. She is originally from New Jersey and received
Premium Panic disorder Anxiety disorders Generalized anxiety disorder