CHAPTER 7 – CRIMINAL LAW 7.1 Introduction The term criminal law‚ sometimes called penal law‚ refers to various rules whose common characteristic is the imposition of punishment if one fails to comply with the rules. In criminal law‚ a crime is considered as a wrong against the State. A crime may be defined as an unlawful act or an omission which is unacceptable that causes public condemnation in a form of sanction. Therefore‚ a crime is a wrong which affects the public welfare‚ a wrong for which
Premium Criminal law
Actus reus is known as conduct‚ which mean a person cannot be charged for thinking a crime‚ they must have committed an actual crime. Mens rea is the mental state of a person‚ which means the crime must have been voluntarily or purposely committed. Finally‚ concurrence means actus reus and mens rea must be committed at the same time. For this particular case none of these elements are relevant
Premium Miranda v. Arizona Law Police
referred to as the ‘actus reus’ of a crime. However this alone is insufficient for conviction‚ unless it concerns a crime which is of strict liability‚ like Harrow London BC v. Shah . Alongside the ‘actus reus’ element of a crime there is also a requirement for the accused to have the appropriate state of mind known as the ‘mens rea’. Both ‘actus reus’ and ‘mens rea’ need to be apparent to create criminal liability. Another dimension to criminal liability is that not all ‘actus rei’ require an ‘act’
Premium Criminal law Causality
Supreme Court Case CJA/354 Supreme Court Case The discovery of unethical billing alongside unethical accounting practices provoked a chain reaction towards a hospital accountant by the name of Rehberg. An accountant trying to serve justice was entangled in a web of lies. Rehberg vs. Paulk is a very interesting Supreme Court case. Rehberg vs. Paulk embodied much of the injustice that is not presented to the public when sworn officials break the very laws that are supposed to be
Premium Jury Criminal law Law
Criminal Law Paper Gaby Rielle CJA/354 Criminal Law August 12‚ 2014 Mendi Leigh Criminal Law Paper Maryland v. King‚ 569 U.S.‚ on June 3‚ 2013 the United States Supreme Court ruled that it is not a violation of the fourth amendment right by having your DNA swabbed while being booked into a detention facility. And that a simple swab on the inner cheek was no different than taking a photo or being finger printed during the booking process. This case came to be after an individual was arrested
Premium Criminal law Crime Supreme Court of the United States
Principles of Criminal Liability 1/16/2013 Student ID: Word Count: 2482 Criminal activities are very common in our society. With the intention to hamper the property of other people or causing ill effect to others‚ criminal activities are occurred usually. Sometimes people involve themselves with some activities to injure others due to personal clash or from ill temperament. Some activities which may be done to cause simple injury
Free Criminal law Manslaughter
Criminal Law notes 1.Voluntary act: Status offences – no conduct is required but the crime is committed when a certain state of affair exists or the defendant is in a certain condition or is of a particular status. R v Larsonneur (1933) – Appellant was brought involuntarily back to the UK where she was charged on being an ‘alien’. LCJ Hewart claimed the ‘circumstances are perfectly immaterial’ Winzar v Chief constable of Kent (1983) – drunk on a public highway. LJ Robert Goff claimed ‘it is enough
Premium Criminal law
the Theft Act 1968 and states that “a person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it” and has a maximum sentence of seven years imprisonment. The actus reus of theft has three elements that need to co-exist‚ these are “property”‚ “appropriation” and “belonging to another“. “Dishonesty” is one of two elements required for the mens rea of theft‚ with the other being an intention to permanently deprive
Premium Criminal law Theft Law
Elements of a Crime and how the elements of a crime apply to the overall criminal procedure process? The three elements of crime are actus reus‚ mens rea‚ and the relationship between the two. Actus reus is commission or omission that is illegal. The act must be voluntary and must break a criminal statue. Mens rea is the guilty state of mind. Accidently switching briefcases with someone at an airport does not possess mens rea. (Jon’a F. Meyer‚ Diana R. Grant‚ 2003) The relationship of the two must
Premium Criminal law Crime Criminal justice
Professor Aryka N. Moore Assignment 1 Week 4: Criminal Conduct and Criminal Law Determine whether or not a conviction is feasible when an alleged perpetrator does not have the required mens rea but has engaged in the actus rea. Provide a rationale to support your position. Crime has been a part of American history for years and will continue to be for all time. Criminal laws regulate human conduct and tell people what they can and cannot do and‚ in some instances‚ what
Premium Criminal law Crime Law