Preview

◦Why Do Firms Purchase Other Corporations

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
287 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
◦Why Do Firms Purchase Other Corporations
Discussion Board 4
American Intercontinental University
Why do firms purchase other corporations? Many firms purchase other companies to make their company larger. The growth of a company is achieved through expansion of purchasing already built companies and expanding their business into empty building. Merging with other companies is sometimes easier since the business is already setup. They can gain good managers and employee as well as formidable contracts that they were not using before.
Do firms pay too much for the acquired corporation? Companies often pay too much for their recently acquired businesses. Mergers are generally a little less on the pocket book. Many companies also buyout the majority of stock and purchase the company that way. However when buying a company through stock they also inherit the mishaps of the company and will have to fix them. But while they may spend to much for what the business currently is, it may not be too much money for what the company could become.
Why do so many acquisitions result in shareholder losses? The reason the company was bought out can result in shareholder losses. For a company to be bought out there is a reason. The company could have had bad management, bad owners, or just a failing product. This needs to be taken into consideration when someone chooses to buy the company and how they are going to fix it. Many results do not end well.

References:
Do Acquiring Firms Knowingly Pay Too Much for Target Firms? Evidence from Earnings Management in Member-Firm Mergers in Korean Business Groups Jae Wook Jeong* and Gil S. Bae** This version, January 2011

Too Much Cash, Too Little Innovation



References: Do Acquiring Firms Knowingly Pay Too Much for Target Firms? Evidence from Earnings Management in Member-Firm Mergers in Korean Business Groups Jae Wook Jeong* and Gil S. Bae** This version, January 2011 Too Much Cash, Too Little Innovation http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/05_29/b3943092_mz063.htm

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Unit 4 Key Drivers P1

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To access new markets: A company selling sports equipment, for example, buys a sports clothing company so that it can add products and services to its portfolio that it feels will interest its existing customers. Alternatively, an organisation might purchase a company active in a completely different market sector so that it can get involved in new different…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    M&a Exam Review

    • 2985 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Why do you think shareholders from target companies enjoy an average gain when acquired, while acquiring shareholders on average…

    • 2985 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nina's Fashions Case Study

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages

    There are several reasons mergers are appealing to companies. Mergers can diversify company’s interests similar to an individual’s stock portfolio thus reducing its overall risk. Mergers also can serve as a source of growth for a company, instead of a company reinvesting its returns into growing its own company at a rate in which the company can’t handle it can acquire one that has steady growth like itself and grow them both at a reasonable rate. It is also beneficial to companies that merger because they create added value through synergies, economies of scale, and better management.…

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Eagles Electronics Case

    • 3249 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Cremers, N. & Kose, J.2009, Takeovers and cross-section of returns: Review of financial studies, 22, pp. 1409-1445…

    • 3249 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Extended Essay

    • 1587 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In order to achieve economic goals, stay competitive and improve market position, firms have to advance with times by executing all kinds of strategies, one of which is acquisition. “An acquisition resembles more of an arm’s-length deal, with one firm purchasing the assets or shares of another, and with the acquired firm’s shareholders ceasing to be owners of that firm” (Sudarsanam, 2003). Serving as an important capital restructuring tool, acquisition offers firms a conceivable opportunity for development by taking over another firm economically and legally. This essay aims to demonstrate that initially firms can achieve growth by the means of the acquisition of another firm, but the long-term effect of acquisition appears to be a double-edged sword. Targeted financial indicators will be cited to support this view, and different factors, which include stock market value, shareholders’ income, firm management, external pressure, supply of resources and internal cooperation, will be discussed respectively.…

    • 1587 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Does M&a Add Value?

    • 2939 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Bibliography: Goergen, M. and Renneboog,L., 2003. Shareholder wealth effects of European domestic and crossborder takeover bids. European Corporate Governance Institute Finance Working Paper Roll, R., 1986. The hubris hypothesis of Corporate Takeovers, Journal of Business 59, 197-216 Servaes,H., 1991. Tobin’s Q and the gains from takeovers. Journal of Finance 46, 409-419 Kaplan,S and Weisbach,M.,1992. The Success of Acquisitions: Evidence from Divestitures, Journal of Finance 47, 107-138. Jensen, MC., 1986. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers. American Economic Review 76, 323-329 Asquith, P; Bruner, R; and Mullins,F., 1987. Merger returns and the form of financing. Working Paper, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard Business School Bruner, R., 2001. Does M&A Pay? A Survey of Evidence for the Decision-Maker. Batten Institute Working Paper, Darden Graduate School of Business Caves, R., 1989. Mergers, Takeovers and Economic Efficiency. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 7 151-174 Meeks,G., 1977. Disappointing Marriage: A Study of Gains from Merger. Cambridge University Press Huang,Y and Walkling,R., 1989. Target Abnormal Returns Associated with Acquisition Announcements: Payment, Acquisition Form and Managerial Resistance, Journal of Financial Economics Yook, K.C., 2000. Larger Return to Cash Acquisitions: Signalling effect or Leverage effect? Working Paper, Johns Hopkins Gregory, A., 1997. An Examination of the Long Run Performance of UK Acquiring Firms. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 971-1002 Loughran,T and Vijh,A., 1997. Do long term shareholders benefit from corporate acquisitions? Journal of Finance, 52 1765-1790 Lang,L; Stulz,R; and Walkling,R.,1989. Managerial Performance, Tobin’s Q and Gains from Successful Tender Offers. Journal of Financial Economics 24 137 - 154 Lewellen,W; Rosenfeld,A., 1985. Merger Decisions and Executive Stock Ownership in Acquiring Firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics 7 209-231 Berger,P.G and Ofek, E.,1995. Diversification’s Effect on Firm Value. Journal of Financial Economics 37 39-65 Bloomberg for accounting and financial data…

    • 2939 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This can cause many problems for the business, such as contrasting cultures in the business which could lead to an unsuccessful business with multiple goals and the two companies could be heading in opposite directions. Also by acquiring the business in this way there could be potential problems in the structure of the business, such as when Vodafone took over many companies and couldn’t successfully integrate the companies into one solid structure. When Kraft decided to take over…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Finance

    • 5399 Words
    • 22 Pages

    Nakamura, H.R. (2005) Motives, Partner Selection and Productivity Effects of M&As: The Pattern of Japanese Mergers and Acquisition, Thesis (Ph.D.), Institute of International Business, Stockholm School of Economics.…

    • 5399 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Horizontal Mergers

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Mergers occur when one business firm buys or acquires another business firm (the acquired firm) and the combined firm maintains the identity of the acquiring firm. Business firms merge for a variety of reasons, both financial and non-financial. There are a number of types of mergers. Horizontal and non-horizontal are just two of many types.…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Acquisition Essay

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages

    An acquisition means the purchase of one company by another company. Consolidation occurs when two companies combine together to form a new company altogether. An acquisition may be private or public, depending on whether the acquiree or merging company is or is not listed in public markets. An acquisition is of 2 types i.e. friendly or hostile.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The acquiring company's stock usually goes down for a number of reasons. First, as we mentioned above, the acquiring company must pay more than the target company currently is worth to make the deal go through. Beyond that, there are often a number of uncertainties involved with acquisitions.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A corporate merger is the creation of a single firm for two firms and combine their assets and liabilities. Merger tends to be used when the scale of the two enterprises are similar. It common occurs in high return industries. A corporate acquisition is the purchase of the target company by acquiring company. Acquisition tends to occur when the scale of the two companies are not similar, a lager company controls a smaller company, common in low growth industries (Teriesen). Acquiring company refers to the firm which shares are continuing exist, but it may be under a different name, and the target company is referred to the firm whose shares are substituted by the acquiring company.…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most of publicly traded companies’ mergers destroy value for buy-side shareholders and at the same time sellers are compensated with premiums1. The same opinion is stated in one of the most quoted book about valuation and creating value: most of M&A deals don’t create value for buyers2. According to G. Bennett Stewart there are two main reasons why acquisitions too frequently reduce share prices of the acquiring company: sometimes this occurs because the buyer’s acquisition criteria make no sense, and more often the buyer simply overpays3. But can it be that simple? Following Aswath Damodaran all failure reasons may occur on different stages of M&A deal (see exhibit 1). On the first stage acquisition criteria are the most important. Without doubt M&A deal should be the continuation of company’s strategy – growth of FCF and decrease of getting those FCF risks4. The most powerful framework for company’s strategy analysis is believed to be WOFC5 as well as frameworks established by Bruce Henderson. In most cases managers (not shareholders) are actors who decide what company and at what price should be bought. So, not tendency to create value for shareholders, but private interests may have influence6.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mergers and acquisitions (abbreviated M&A) is an aspect of corporate strategy, corporate finance and management dealing with the buying, selling, dividing and combining of different companies and similar entities that can help an enterprise grow rapidly in its sector or location of origin, or a new field or new location, without creating a subsidiary, other child entity or using a joint venture.…

    • 7213 Words
    • 29 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    8. Lichtenberg, F. and Siegel, D. (1990). The effects of leveraged buyouts on productivity and related aspects of firm behaviour. Journal of Financial Economics. 9. Lubatkin, M. and Chatterjee, S. (1994). Extending modern portfolio theory into the domain of corporate diversification: Does it apply?. Academy of Management Journal, 37, pp. 109-136. 10. Pinegar, M. and Wilbricht, L. (1989). What Managers Think of Capital Structure Theory: A Survey. Financial Management, Winter, pp. 82-91. 11. Smith, A. (1990). Corporate ownership structure and performance. The case of Management Buyouts. Journal of Financial Economics, 27, pp.143-164. 12. McConnell, J. and Muscarella, C. (1985). Corporate capital expenditure decisions and the market value of firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 14, pp. 399-422. 13. Modigliani, F. and Miller, M. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance, and the theory of investment. American economic Review 48, June, 261-197. 14. Dividend Smoothing, Agency Costs, and Information Asymmetry: Lessons from the Dividend Policies of Private Firms. 15. Michael S. Rozeff , Growth, Beta and Agency Costs as Determinants of Dividend Payout Ratios, Journal of Financial Research, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 249-259, Fall 1982. 16. Smith, A. (1990). Corporate ownership structure and performance. The case of Management Buyouts. Journal of Financial Economics, 27, pp.143-164. 17. Henri Servaes Tobin’s Q and the gain from takeovers: The Journal of Finance • Vol. LXVI, No. 1 • March 1991. 18. Easterbrook (1984): Two Agency-Cost Explanations of Dividends. 19. The Modern Corporation and Private Property, Berle and Means. 20. Brealey & Myers on Corporate Finance: Capital Investment and Valuation , Richard A Brealey, Stewart C Myers. 21. The Black (1976) effect and cross market arbitrage in FTSE-100 index futures and options.…

    • 2496 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays