Preview

Why Do Most Mergers and Acquisitions (M&a) Fail to Create Value for the Acquirer's Shareholders? What Are the Main Reasons in Your Opinion?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1105 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Do Most Mergers and Acquisitions (M&a) Fail to Create Value for the Acquirer's Shareholders? What Are the Main Reasons in Your Opinion?
Why do most mergers and acquisitions (M&A) fail to create value for the acquirer 's shareholders? What are the main reasons in your opinion?
Identify the difference between a good company and a good investment

Most of publicly traded companies’ mergers destroy value for buy-side shareholders and at the same time sellers are compensated with premiums1. The same opinion is stated in one of the most quoted book about valuation and creating value: most of M&A deals don’t create value for buyers2. According to G. Bennett Stewart there are two main reasons why acquisitions too frequently reduce share prices of the acquiring company: sometimes this occurs because the buyer’s acquisition criteria make no sense, and more often the buyer simply overpays3. But can it be that simple? Following Aswath Damodaran all failure reasons may occur on different stages of M&A deal (see exhibit 1). On the first stage acquisition criteria are the most important. Without doubt M&A deal should be the continuation of company’s strategy – growth of FCF and decrease of getting those FCF risks4. The most powerful framework for company’s strategy analysis is believed to be WOFC5 as well as frameworks established by Bruce Henderson. In most cases managers (not shareholders) are actors who decide what company and at what price should be bought. So, not tendency to create value for shareholders, but private interests may have influence6.

It is already well known that diversification is a false motive for M&A, because it is cheaper and simpler to diversify for certain investor than for whole corporation7. At the same

1

Frank C. Evans, David M. Bishop. Valuation for M&A. Building Value in Private Companies / John Wiley & Sons, rd Inc. 3 edition, 2009, p. 71 2 Tom Copeland, Tim Koller, Jack Murrin. Valuation: Measuring & Managing the Value of Companies / John Wiley & rd Sons, Inc. 3 edition, 2008, p. 132 3 G. Bennett Stewart, III. The Quest for Value: A Guide for Senior Managers / Harper

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Disney and Pixar

    • 5364 Words
    • 22 Pages

    Careful thinking about what it means for an acquisition to succeed, coupled with an analysis of why deals fail, can lead to some practical advice for managers, thus helping them to develop a more refined view. More specifically, in order for acquisitions to pay off, they ought to pass four tests. I describe the tests below, showing how each offers a way to head off common sources of merger malfunction.…

    • 5364 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Extended Essay

    • 1587 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Acquisition initially provides growth to the acquirer. An empirical research study based on a sample of 12023 acquisitions shows that these firms received an equally weighted abnormal announcement return of 1.1% (Moeller, Schlingemann and Stulz, 2004). The return was generally positive, which indicates that acquiring-firms’ market value might ascend faster than original schema while the overall risk is constant. Therefore after a formal announcement is made, acquisition, to some extent, stimulates firms’ growth within a short-term observation period. Moreover, according to another study in the US, shareholders of both target firms and bidder firms benefited from acquisitions at different levels in the short-term (Sudarsanam, 2003), which could probably be explained by the generalized market rise promoted by optimistic expectations of investors after careful and thorough risk analysis (Petmezas, 2009). The rise of market value means available revenues newly…

    • 1587 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Finance

    • 5399 Words
    • 22 Pages

    As part of my assignment, I have been asked to discuss the following statement “Mergers and acquisitions can be value destroyers or value creators”. A merger can be defined as when two equal businesses in terms of profit margin and status, combine in order to become one legal entity. Initially, the fundamental reason for this merge is to produce a company that is worth more than the sum of its parts. An acquisition is where one company acquires a controlling interest in another company. The combination of these unequal companies can produce the same or even more benefits as a merger would. In different cases, these mergers and acquisitions are either considered as the creator of value or the destroyer of value or even possibly both. A company that is considered as a value creator is carrying out their primary value-adding activities in the right manner. In contrast, a company that is seen as a value destroyer does the complete opposite meaning that the company is less appealing to employees, customers and potential investors.…

    • 5399 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a general rule, mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are value destructive for shareholders. Demergers or spin-offs are value accretive. In simple English, that means, avoid the shares of an acquiring company. But there may be money making opportunities in the companies being demerged or spun off.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The goals of mergers range from reducing the number of competitors, to access of new products (Belcourt et al., p 330). Statistics show that 80% of new product developments fail (Howells, 2011), partly due to challenges and conflicts with human resources functions. Mergers and acquisitions are the fastest way to enter new markets. “It is estimated that 1/3 of all mergers fail due to faulty integration of diverse operations and cultures,” (Chhinzer, 2013). Therefore, the success of a merger or acquisition lies in the ability to guide, motivate, retain, and effectively use employees, and rarely has anything to do with financials. Mergers and acquisitions cause insecurity, lower levels of satisfaction at work, less affective commitment, and a loss of trust in the firm (Belcourt et al., p 329-330). In one study, it was found that declines in job satisfaction resulted in costs to the employer of approximately $17,000 per employee (Fairfield-Sonn et al., 2002). The loss of productivity stems from employees being afraid to make a mistake, resentment in the merger, and dealing with rumours about the merger (Belcourt et al., p 330).…

    • 5441 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The reason the company was bought out can result in shareholder losses. For a company to be bought out there is a reason. The company could have had bad management, bad owners, or just a failing product. This needs to be taken into consideration when someone chooses to buy the company and how they are going to fix it. Many results do not end well.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Theoretically it is assumed that mergers improve the performance of the acquiring firm due to…

    • 2327 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Does M&a Add Value?

    • 2939 Words
    • 12 Pages

    The aim of this paper is to analyse whether or not M&A (Merger & Acquisition) activity generates shareholder wealth. The paper will also focus on a case study of M&A activity within the financial sector. The starting point is to define the term ‘shareholder wealth’. Shareholder wealth is the wealth created for shareholders either through increases in the value of the shares that they hold or through the payment of dividends, or both. In finance theory, wealth maximisation is the main goal of the managers of a firm. This is when the present value of the expected cash flows from a project exceeds the initial outlay on the project. From the view point of an acquirer, the equivalent logic is that shareholder wealth is maximised when the value added as a result of the acquisition of the target exceeds the cost of that acquisition. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to critically analyse and evaluate whether shareholder wealth is created as a result of the merger and acquisitions process. Central to this discussion will be the following: Effect of M&A on target shareholder wealth Effect of M&A on acquirer shareholder wealth Time period over which changes in shareholder wealth occur (short term versus long term), and how they are measured Do different payment forms (shares, cash or a combination) result in statistically different returns to target and acquirer shareholders? Differences in returns to shareholder wealth based on whether the…

    • 2939 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Company Mergers

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A lot has been written about the financial aspects of merging companies. Less attention has been focused on the human element. More and more firms risk similar fates as the nation continues to experience a boom in mergers and acquisitions. Last year there were 11,655 domestic mergers and or acquisition deals for a staggering $1.6 trillion, according to Securities Data Company, a research organization in Newark, NJ The number of deals has more than doubled since 1990, when 5,654 transactions were reported.…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gm Merger Acquisition

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Companies from different industries decide to use an acquisition strategy for several reasons; however, acquisition strategies are not without problems. When acquisitions contribute to poor performance, a company may deem it necessary to restructure its operations.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Although acquisitions may be beneficial, there are downsides that must be considered. Each company is unique and the acquiring organization must learn the must learn their strengths, weaknesses and operations. This, however, is not always that case. Companies tend to overpay for the transfer of data, improperly finance or don 't properly gauge the managerial or human resource capabilities of the target company.…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Merger Analysis

    • 15900 Words
    • 64 Pages

    Bibliography: Historically, mergers have often failed to add significantly to the value of the acquiring firm 's…

    • 15900 Words
    • 64 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mergers and Acquisitions

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The impact of mergers and acquisitions on business can be minor in some cases and larger in others. Companies merge with or acquire other companies for the purpose of making money. Sometimes these deals have a sensible reason for being made and other times they are dubious in nature, done for the sole purpose of raising the stock price.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mergers and acquisitions have been essential tools of corporate growth and have become an attractive means by which to grow an enterprise. According to Cartwright and Cooper (1996), over 50% of North American business acquisitions failed as measured by an increase in shareholder value and additional studies revealed that the human capital element impacts more so than the financial factoring among the root causes of merger and acquisition failure (Cartwright & Cooper, 1996).…

    • 3181 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    All mergers are not successful; the main reason for it being the inflexible approach and attitude between the management of the firms. This becomes an organizational change for employees and hence they naturally resist it. Leadership is highly affected when mergers are formed, according to a research study. Cultural mismatch is another reason why most mergers fail since it affects the performance, initiates departure of key executives and gives rise to time consuming conflicts in the business.…

    • 999 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays