What Is The Difference Between Managers And Leaders?
Managers and Leaders
Leadership and Management though they are at times used as meaning the same, they are different and should not be used interchangeably. The many and similar definitions of leadership and management have made it very difficult to differentiate the two (Stogdill , 1974).
“Leadership is about articulating visions, embodying values and creating the environment within which things can be accomplished” (Richards and Engle, 1986, p, 206)
Whilst “Management works out how to achieve the vision and gets things done by organizing, planning, motivating, co-ordinating and controlling.” (CIM, 2014, p. 174)
Managers are appointed and are mainly focused on achieving objectives whilst leaders arise from groups naturally to provide others …show more content…
According to Yukl, G (2013) an individual can be a leader without being a manager, like some informal leaders and can also be a manager without being a leader, some people with the job title manager do not have any subordinates. Managers and leaders need to clearly communicate so as to ensure that the vision is understood and objectives are met.
Leaders have to conceptualize what is in the future and value flexibility, innovation, and adaptation whilst managers develop strategies, and plans that will result to the realization of a leader’s vision, managers value stability, order and efficiency. Managers are risk averse and value short term goals. In some companies the leader and the manager are one person this is a challenge as the person needs to know what role to play and when to play it hence leadership and management are two different roles but can both be played by one person and not all leaders can be managers and vice versa.
Management and Leadership …show more content…
Employees are not being rewarded fairly, those who are high performers feel they are underpaid and this has over the years breed disgruntlement and demoralization. This has also seen staff with the key competences and skills fleeing the company resulting in high labor turnover.
TTCS is operating in an economic environment that is characterized by high unemployment rates. This has seen those in higher and influential position abusing their position power to recruit their unqualified and incompetent relatives, friends to fill crucial posts that would have fallen vacant or arisen within the organization.
Management at TTCS does not develop its staff due to fear for their job security. They do not encourage staff to develop their maximum potential and this has resulted in low innovation and creativity thus failing to embed the culture of innovativeness within the corporate cultural values.
As mentioned above, the management style at TTCS is very autocratic meaning that work is not allocated by consultation and with cooperation from staff. This has led to reduced productivity and resource utilization resulting in project budget overruns as project completion set dates are missed time and
Leadership and Management though they are at times used as meaning the same, they are different and should not be used interchangeably. The many and similar definitions of leadership and management have made it very difficult to differentiate the two (Stogdill , 1974).
“Leadership is about articulating visions, embodying values and creating the environment within which things can be accomplished” (Richards and Engle, 1986, p, 206)
Whilst “Management works out how to achieve the vision and gets things done by organizing, planning, motivating, co-ordinating and controlling.” (CIM, 2014, p. 174)
Managers are appointed and are mainly focused on achieving objectives whilst leaders arise from groups naturally to provide others …show more content…
According to Yukl, G (2013) an individual can be a leader without being a manager, like some informal leaders and can also be a manager without being a leader, some people with the job title manager do not have any subordinates. Managers and leaders need to clearly communicate so as to ensure that the vision is understood and objectives are met.
Leaders have to conceptualize what is in the future and value flexibility, innovation, and adaptation whilst managers develop strategies, and plans that will result to the realization of a leader’s vision, managers value stability, order and efficiency. Managers are risk averse and value short term goals. In some companies the leader and the manager are one person this is a challenge as the person needs to know what role to play and when to play it hence leadership and management are two different roles but can both be played by one person and not all leaders can be managers and vice versa.
Management and Leadership …show more content…
Employees are not being rewarded fairly, those who are high performers feel they are underpaid and this has over the years breed disgruntlement and demoralization. This has also seen staff with the key competences and skills fleeing the company resulting in high labor turnover.
TTCS is operating in an economic environment that is characterized by high unemployment rates. This has seen those in higher and influential position abusing their position power to recruit their unqualified and incompetent relatives, friends to fill crucial posts that would have fallen vacant or arisen within the organization.
Management at TTCS does not develop its staff due to fear for their job security. They do not encourage staff to develop their maximum potential and this has resulted in low innovation and creativity thus failing to embed the culture of innovativeness within the corporate cultural values.
As mentioned above, the management style at TTCS is very autocratic meaning that work is not allocated by consultation and with cooperation from staff. This has led to reduced productivity and resource utilization resulting in project budget overruns as project completion set dates are missed time and