Preview

What Is Karen Davis 'Thinking Like A Chicken'

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1954 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is Karen Davis 'Thinking Like A Chicken'
What qualities make our life worth value? This question usually arises in any discussion regarding animal ethics. It is impossible to answer this question, however, because no one other then God will definitively even know the exact qualities that make our lives valuable. All we can do is guess what parts of us give us higher value over other creatures that inhabit our planet. So we let our perceptions and pre-conceived notions about animals dictate how we treat them. Everyone consciously or subconsciously ranks living creatures and attributes value to them. The way we often do this is we set ourselves as a benchmark. Then we compare ourselves to them and look for similarities. The more similar they are to us the more value the must have. …show more content…
How we treat animals, however, has much more to say about who we are as a species, rather than it has to say about our furry neighbors. And it is time to look into the mirror and see if we are proud of what is looking back at us.
This topic of preconceived notions dictating how we treat animals is the theme of Karen Davis's “Thinking Like a Chicken.” One of the many interesting sub-topics of animal ethics addressed in this paper is the topic of domestication. If we created and formed domesticated animals through selective breeding do they deserve rights? Karen Davis and I would argue that they do (Davise, 1995). This is a case however when our preconceived notions about animals are right. Domesticated animals in our absence would die. They are no longer adapted to their local environment; they are adapted to the specific commodity we bred them for. So in many ways, they are our own creation. But who owns life? Not us and not amount of genetic engineering will ever change that. And even if we do own their life how is it not a sin to treat them so cruelly. In her paper, Karen Davis gives specific
…show more content…
That being said wild animals that are captured for zoos are in desperate need of our empathy as well. I personally growing up have had a somewhat positive view of zoos. As I got older and learned more about them my option of them has drastically changed. In our age of smartphones and laptops, we are in desperate need of a positive influence to get kids interested in animals and the natural world. Growing up I always believed that zoo’s played a big role in this. This changed however after I read “Thought To Exist In the Wild” By Derek Johnson. Derek Johnson systematically tears apart the argument that zoos are educational when he equates zoos to pornography; they are just a superficial representation of the real thing. The whole idea of keeping animals in an enclosure teaches children that animals are inferior beings in need of our support. Which leads to believe that it is ok to treat them cruelly. Children do not even have the desired learning outcomes that we would expect. Derrick Johnson points out that when you go to a zoo you don’t see any awe or wonder. You just see children making faces at the animals and poking on the glass (Jensen, 2007). Anyone who has spent a reasonable amount of time at a zoo would have a hard time arguing with him. If children are not even learning more about animals the only reason we have zoos is purely for entertainment. Now some people

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    When I was younger, going to the zoo seemed like an extravaganza since I got to see animals that I didn't typically get to see. As I've become older, I find it repulsive as it shows how inhumane people can behave by trapping animals and taking them from their homes for entertainment. Being removed from their natural habitat is preventing these creatures from reaching their full potential and from learning survival skills, which includes hunting, worsening their chances for survival and…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justin Le Ms. Jackson ERWC English 28 October 2014 Animal Bill of Rights Despite our genetic makeup and ability, each living organism still obtains the ability to partake in the vast contribution towards this world. We as humans should be proactive in our role of establishing and maintaining a fine balance of life. A prominent responsibility we possess is to regard all living beings as equals.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the years, it has been over looked whether or not the zoo really is a proper environment to keep animals. Are the animals really being cared for or are they being taken against their will? Are the animals in a comfortable environment or are they just another reason to make money? The zoo is an environment where people of all ages can explore and learn more about different species around the globe. It is safe for the visitors and also the animals themselves. The zoo is a productive and successful strategy for protecting endangered species worldwide because they provide animals with proper shelter, proper nutrition and they create fundraisers and charities to help save the animals.…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    More than three decades ago Peter Singer heralded the need for a new kind of liberation movement, one calling for a radical expansion of the human moral canvas and more importantly, a rejection of the horrors human beings have inflicted for millennia upon other sentient beings, treatment historically considered as being both natural and unalterable. Often regarded as being the father of the modern animal liberation movement, Singer contends that the campaign for animal liberation today is analogous to the struggles for racial and gender justice of the past. (1976, p. 34-36) This essay will attempt to highlight the distinctions made by Singer between sentience and self-conciousness and what implications such a distinction suggests for the moral status of animals. Furthermore, this essay will attempt to identify and contrast the moral status of animals with that of human animals and identify the bases of such standing in ethical deliberation.…

    • 1819 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Care Ethics and Animal Welfare” is an article written by Daniel Engster from the Journal of Social Philosophy, published by Wiley Periodicals in 2016. Daniel Engster received his PhD from the University of Chicago and is a professor in the Political Science department at the University of Texas in San Antonio.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When animals such as the killer whale are forced to do tricks for human entertainment it can be damaging for them. They are large creatures who live in tanks most not in suitable size for the animal and many die a premature death. Zoos all the while try to make the animals as comfortable as possible and help save animals left for dead. In the recent years the Columbus Zoo rescued a polar bear cub since the mother abandoned it and the cub has been doing great ever since. Zoos try to make the animals live longer, feel safe and live a normal life, but not all zoos try to make this possible. Some zoos only do things to earn money and sell these poor animals to other places like the circus. Zoos, circuses and aquariums maybe a good idea, but as said in the article “it means that lending our voice to the voiceless matters.” We as people need to do the right thing for the animal not for the exploitation of them. I agree seeing animals in person rather than a picture and or a video is much more breathtaking and can be educational for kids. For the animals they are not in there natural habitat and are not able to do the natural things they would in the environments. Maybe meeting halfway for the people who agree with Zoos and other facilities for animals won’t be enough. For example in the article it says “... increase the quality of life in captivity,…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Some argue that zoos are fundamental to the education of their children. Additionally, some believe zoos allow children to bond with the animals. However, since animals are trapped in smaller environments, they act differently than they do in the wild. Therefore, there is no real educational value in observing these trapped animals. Animals in confinement do not hunt, play, or act as they do in their natural habitat, hence children are learning false behaviors of animals. Zoo advocates also espouse the belief that zoos are instrumental in protecting endangered species. Nevertheless, only seventeen percent of the species in zoos are endangered (“Zoo Statistics”). Many of the endangered species in zoos are stolen from the wilderness and the chances of being released back are nearly impossible because zoos need them for money (Russo). Furthermore, zoos do not release endangered animals because their ability to survive in the wild has greatly diminished as a result of time spent in captivity (Russo). The best way to preserve animals in danger of extinction is to protect them in their natural habitats, not imprison them in…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Zoos

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Zoos are like internment camps and should be shut down. Animals deserve the right to live out their lives in their natural habitat, not be the source of human entertainment. Zoos are more detrimental to animals than they are good for them, even though there are conservation efforts and educational purposes for having animals in captivity. The negative aspects far outweigh any positive effects when it comes to having animals in captivity due to poor living conditions, failure to educate, and psychological trauma.…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The debate was now placed for the question whether animals, being with or without intelligence, deserve a degree of rights, and if so what degree of rights do they deserve? This question is what Peter Singer grapples with today, and which I will discuss in the second part of this essay.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Zoo’s are an attraction for many each year, but not enjoyed by the animals behind the steel bars and glass windows. Would being locked in a cage and have visitors looking in while pounding the glass and rumbling the bars be a day worth enjoying? Of course, not. These actions are what the animals facial and body expressions reveal to visitors taking pictures. The zoo’s guests, being excited to be there and admiring the animals, cannot place themselves on the other side. Visitors sees only how everything appears to be perfect for their viewing pleasure. Simply stated, animals should not be locked in cages. For instance, elephants that are…

    • 1934 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the last few years, the pressure to cage animals in zoos has led to animals losing their instincts, freedom, and behavior. The threats posed by the zookeepers are encouraging anti-zoo activists to push beyond early efforts such as sending zoo animals in the wild to keep them from being captive in zoos. Today, in the interest of keeping animals in their natural habitat, many anti-zoo activists are trying to change how people poorly treat animals. Although there are those that oppose to keeping animals in their natural habitat in the wild, anti-zoo activists should make every effort to send more animals in the wild because doing so will prevent animals from suffering, allow them to be free, and keep them remain in their own natural habitat.…

    • 127 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What's Wrong With Zoos

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Others think that the zoo is a great place to view mother nature's creatures for a reasonable price. In the excerpt, “Zoos Connect Us to the Natural World”, it states, “Only a small percentage of our nation's citizens can afford to travel to exotic locations to view wild tigers, elephants, or giant pandas”. But, that right there states wild tigers, elephants and pandas, and they are called wild animals for a reason they are supposed to be free and well wild. So instead of keeping these animals caged up we should let them be what they are meant to be and that is wild animals.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If humans have been given rights of their own, animals should have rights, too. Animals don’t deserve to be experimented on. They feel pain just as humans. We shouldn’t take animals for granted. They have a huge part in our world’s natural cycle. In Lisa Kemmerer’s article titled “Animal Rights” she asserts the issue of what defines animal rights. She addresses the fact that animals need rights just as humans. Ms. Kemmerer subtopics consist of the challenges that follow animal rights, the importance of animal rights, and the reasons why we need to consider standing up for animal rights. As Lisa Kemmerer states, “Animal rights is a simple idea because, at the most basic level, it means only that animal share a right to be treated with respect. It is a profound idea because its implications are far-reaching” (275). It is very important to acknowledge that animals need to be treated with respect. Animals are unable to voice their own rights. It is our duty to use our own rights to advocate the rights of animals. Without advocates for the rights of animals, our economic system may drop from unlawful standards. As a second writer suggests that as human we have moral obligations to not judge one by their outward appearance, skin colour, and ethical background yet we seem to judge animals without considering their feelings (274). We have such an impact on animals that we must stand up for animals and protect them. If we don’t take a…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Determining the rights of non-human animals and deciding how to treat them may not be a choice available to our human society. As an advocate for the rights of animals, Tom Reganʻs three main goals are to abandon the use of animals in any scientific research, discontinue all commercial animal agriculture, and to completely terminate both commercial and sport animal hunting. To support these intentions, Regan argues that every human and non-human animal possesses inherent value, which makes them all more than a physical object or vessel. He then states that possessing inherent value allows every human and non-human to have rights of their own. To further his argument, Regan claims that the any human and non-human retaining rights requires equal treatment and respect from others. To conclude his argument, Regan states that due to these reasons, non-human animals cannot be treated as resources and must be treated by humans as equals. In this paper, I object to Reganʻs third premise, which states that non-human and human animals must be treated as equals and with respect, because our communication barrier with non-human animals restricts us from determining their notion of equal treatment or respect, and that attempting to do so could…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Do Zoos Matter?

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I would like to approach that with a different take. People will not be inspired to protect animals unless they see what they are protecting them from: famine, rejection from animal groups (which can ultimately lead to death), fear, and most importantly, extinction. Animals that live in zoos never have to be concerned with whether or not they will receive an adequate amount of food. They will never have to worry about being left by a pack (a majority of zoos do not usually keep a large quantity of one species of animal). And, they will not have to worry about going…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays