Preview

United States Constitution

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
452 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
United States Constitution
c Republicans. These were people who were strongly opposed to the United States Constitution. They wanted a strong state government instead of a strong central government. To them if the central government was too strong then it would threaten the people's liberties and right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

The anti-Federalists were made up of anyone who was poor and not a big landowner, anyone tired of being controlled, anyone who wanted the people's votes to directly count and anyone who wanted to protect their rights. The anti-Federalists were made up of all different types of people, while the Federalists were mainly upper class. The anti-Federalists represented the United States population as a whole better than the Federalists.

When it came to the way the government was run the anti-Federalists wanted the complete opposite of the Federalists. The anti-Federalists wanted their power in the legislature, mainly the lower house where every state has one vote. They wanted the terms of office to be shorter, with limits on how many terms you could serve. These officials were not to be elected by representatives but directly by the people of the United States.

The only way the anti-Federalists would ever even consider helping to ratify the Constitution was if it contained a Bill of Rights, which they thought was "essential for preserving the individual liberties" (www.consitutioncenter.org) of the people. Without this document the government could control every one like a tyranny. To them the Constitution without the Bill of Rights was just a weapon of the upper class against the poor.

The figurehead of the anti-Federalists was Thomas Jefferson who later became President of The United States. The funny thing about Jefferson was for a long time he would not choose sides between the Federalists and the anti-Federalists, he was totally against political parties. He was for a strong central government, which was more of a Federalist's view.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the 1700’s, the first political parties formed over disagreements in the government. The two parties were the federalists and Antifederalists. Federalists made up the people who felt that the stronger government was better for the country and supported the Constitution. The federalists had felt as if different “fiscal and monetary policies” were a weakness for the national economy. Also, the federalists supported banking("Anti-Federalist vs Federalist"). Federalists wanted to fight for stronger governments, managing the country’s debt and ratification. Antifederalists were people who opposed the Constitution of 1788 and disagreed with a stronger federal government. The Antifederalists wanted to keep the power to be for states and local…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Anti-Federalists believed that a strong state government was needed because if you have a strong central government than the people’s rights will not be ensured. (Doc. 4) Patrick Henry opposed the ratification of The Constitution because he believed that without it containing the Bill of Rights it would not allow the people have their natural rights. Anti-Federalist didn’t want to have a stronger national government because it could destroy the liberties of America that have been won during the Revolutionary…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DBQ ratify

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The ones who supported the new form of government were called the Federalists. As shown in Document 1 the federalists believed that the Economy of the U.S was bad due to the Articles of Confederation.…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    U.S Constitution DBQ

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The writing of the U.S Constitution generated many concerns over the amount of power to be allowed in the Federal Government. Political parties of Federalists and Antifederalists formed, sparking debate over the issue. As Federalists supported the proposed U.S Constitution, Antifederalists supported the government formed under the Articles of Confederation. Federalists felt that a strong central government would give protection to public and private credit. Many large landowners, judges, lawyers, leading clergymen, political figures, and merchants were in favor of ratifying the U.S Constitution. James Madison writes in Federalist Papers #10, “Complaints are everywhere heard from our most considerate and virtuous citizens, equally the friends of public and private faith and public of personal liberty, that our governments are too unstable” (Doc. A). Congressmen such as Madison strongly supported a stronger Federal Government. The existing government under the Articles of Confederation needed to be altered to ensure more control over the states. Federalists believed that if change wasn’t made the nation would fail. “Either the…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Federalists Papers were made to explain why the central powers should be more powerful than state powers and how the central powers should be the supreme or absolute power, and the Anti-Federalists papers were made to oppose these views and explain why the state powers and the central powers should still have be equal. The response by the Federalists was more persuasive. The Federalists Paper #10 was written by James Madison. The document was titled “The Union Against Domestic Faction and Insurrection”.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The conflict that took place in the 1790’s between the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists made a huge impact on American History. Alexander Hamilton led the Federalists and focused mainly on the city businesses as well as manufacturing interests of the seaports. On the other side, the Anti-Federalists whom were led by Thomas Jefferson represented the rural farmers and southern interests. With the Federalists favoring more federal involvement and the anti-federalists advocating states rights, this debate between the two concerned the central government versus that of the states.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The federalist were mainly where the person that supported the constitution and was ready to approve it. Imagine living in Florida where it’s a very hot state, with a beautiful beach and many people with unique diversity. The kids running around the park without a care in the world. When you get home from a long day at work and you sit down on your favorite coach waiting for the Golden State Warriors game to come on. You see your friend telling you the warriors might lose against the Washington Wizards. In your head, you know very well this might not be true. Since you like Golden state is your favorite team and it like your home so you felt you should always stay loyal to it or even protect. Well, the Federalist feel closer to their home…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Anti Federalist- small farmers frontiersmen who believed that government should be close to the people and that the concentration of power in the elites is dangerous. This relates to the topic of are unit because people were trying to figure out a way to govern our country and the Anti- federalists thought a certain way. This concept is important to American politics because the Anti federalists were a party who had a certain belief and they are just like the republican or democratic party today.…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalists were individuals who supported the ratification of the Constitution. Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution as stated in the book, "the critics of the Constitution were by no means a unified group" (Faragher, 180). I found it interesting that the Constitution was initially influenced by the Federalist model in regards to interpretation but the pendulum has now swung in the opposite direction to a more Anti-Federalist approach (Content 8-2). The Constitution was ratified and the Federalists won for numerous reasons. The Anti-Federalists had delayed representation while the Federalists promised to amend the Constitution to better protect individual's rights (Faragher, 181). Overall, it was the Federalist representation, planning,…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The federalists were people who supported and promoted the new constitution. These people actually had more of an advantage than their opponents, the anti-federalists. This was because many of their leaders were or had been members of the constitutional convention and were already familiar with the disputed issues in the document. (America, 199) The federalists were therefore much more organized and prepared.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Anti-Federalists have their reasons & the Federalists have theirs. I’m against the idea of a central government and how the freedom of the states should be.…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federalist’s structure of government is superior to that of the Anti-Federalists because we have a better idea of how the government should be run. The Anti-Federalist’s want to include so many things that we do not need like a bill of rights, and a set number of representatives from each state.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Anti Federalists

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The antifederalists were a coalition made up of people from many different backgrounds who opposed ratification of the Constitution. Their organization was not as good as the Federalists; however, they had a profound group of leaders who were exceptional in state politics. Anti-Federalists were an important existence in most states. In several states, supporters of the Constitution agreed to provide support from mild anti-Federalists with recommendations to secure amendments. During ratification the expectation was that the Constitution would be changed to address some of the opponents' concerns. The anti-Federalists worked within the Constitution's bounds after the ratification and they expected Federalists to do the same. Their ratification…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One party consisted of Federalist as the other party consisted of Anti-Federalist .The Federalists which had the belief that the United States should be unified under one central government . The Articles of The Confederation where too weak as extensive problems raised under this document .(such as the high tariffs for crossing from one state to another to import/export goods)Although some Anti-Federalist admitted that The Articles of The Confederation where inefficient most Anti-Federalist believed that the Article just had to be revised. The reasoning behind this was that the Anti-Federalist strongly feared not having a Republic (or a Democracy) in which the people's views were not expressed. Some Anti-Federalist held the belief that a Republic can't truly be an Republic if an larger-scale Republic overshadows it. An agreement was later reached which lay in the constitution the core principle of the Anti-Feudalists beliefs. The 10th amendment was ratified due to the Ideologies of the Anti-Federalist and there position of feudal government boundaries on American society…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Their main concerns included the power that the government held and the natural rights that the people could have. The Constitution was thought to be “radical in this transition; our rights and privileges are endangered, and the sovereignty of the states will be relinquished… The rights of conscience, trial by jury, liberty of the press … are rendered insecure” (Henry 1). Not only were they afraid of falling into another monarchy, they also believed that the rights of each man would be terminated after the Constitution is put into effect. Anti-federalists doubted the effect of the Constitution in the future due to their stances on natural rights for the people and the control that the national government had over the…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays