Preview

Compare And Contrast The Federalist And The Anti-Federalists Dbq

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
536 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare And Contrast The Federalist And The Anti-Federalists Dbq
In 1787 when the Constitution was created it caused many people to start a grand debate. Of course, there were people that supported the constitution and people that were afraid of the constitution. The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists created documents that are within the Constitution that have shaped United States political parties. The Federalists supported a strong central government because the Articles of Confederation didn’t have strong national power, and was very restrictive.A reason why The Federalist wanted to change the constitution was to add people’s opinion into the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists supported a strong state government because they believed that a strong national government would cause a monarch and they were afraid of who will have the power.
The Federalists believed that a strong central government was needed because of the cruel remarks that were made against America in European courts. (Doc. 1) These remarks led the …show more content…
(Doc. 6) They wanted to fix the constitution, because there were many things that needed to be fixed, so we could have a stronger government. The Federalist were afraid that the United States would have bad things happen and they were trying to prevent it from happening. (Doc. 4) Although the Anti-Federalist had their own beliefs about the constitution.
The Anti-Federalists believed that a strong state government was needed because if you have a strong central government than the people’s rights will not be ensured. (Doc. 4) Patrick Henry opposed the ratification of The Constitution because he believed that without it containing the Bill of Rights it would not allow the people have their natural rights. Anti-Federalist didn’t want to have a stronger national government because it could destroy the liberties of America that have been won during the Revolutionary
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    U.S Constitution DBQ
    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages

    U.S Constitution DBQ

    The writing of the U.S Constitution generated many concerns over the amount of power to be allowed in the Federal Government. Political parties of Federalists and Antifederalists formed, sparking debate over the issue. As Federalists supported the proposed U.S Constitution, Antifederalists supported the government formed under the Articles of Confederation. Federalists felt that a strong central government would give protection to public and private credit. Many large landowners, judges, lawyers, leading clergymen, political figures, and merchants were in favor of ratifying the U.S Constitution. James Madison writes in Federalist Papers #10, “Complaints are everywhere heard from our most considerate and virtuous citizens, equally the friends of public and private faith and public of personal liberty, that our governments are too unstable” (Doc. A). Congressmen such as Madison strongly supported a stronger Federal Government. The existing government under the Articles of Confederation needed to be altered to ensure more control over the states. Federalists believed that if change wasn’t made the nation would fail. “Either the…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Anti Federalists Pros And Cons
    • 210 Words
    • 1 Page

    Anti Federalists Pros And Cons

    Anti-Federalists restricted approval of the Constitution and favored the adjustment of power being with the states. They trusted that a capable national government would wind up being overbearing and there will be loss of flexibility, higher assessments, and no power for state laws or courts. The fundamental worry for the Anti-Federalists in the Federalist paper #10 was fairness rights for the general population. It is the reason they affirmed of Article 4, since they bolstered the privileges of the general population and having full confidence and credit given to the states influenced them to feel that the privileges of the states would be maintained. The Anti-Federalists battled for the restriction of ratification in the Constitution just…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Anti-Federalists Argumentative Essay
    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Anti-Federalists Argumentative Essay

    As Anti-Federalists, we argued for civil rights, and power to the people. For what seemed like an eternity, we had debated over the ratification of the constitution. Many things were said with a lot of elaboration and detail to go in them, but ultimately, it came down to four core words. Power to the people. One of the reasons that we had rejected the new central government was because it possessed too much power, and it ripped away the prestige for the states, and threatened their sovereignty. It did the same to the…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explain The Problems With The Framers Of The Constitution
    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Explain The Problems With The Framers Of The Constitution

    There are 13 articles in the constitution, the anti-federalists were all about the articles becuase it gave more power to the states, the federalists did not agree with that. There were many problems with the articles of confederation one of them being that 9 of the 13 states had to agree with a law in order to pass it. Another problem was since there was no president or executive branch there was no way to guarantee laws passed by congress were carried out. There were also no courts to judge or pune the law because there was no national court system.…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analyze the Reason for the Anti-Federalist’ Opposition to Ratifying the Constitution
    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Analyze the Reason for the Anti-Federalist’ Opposition to Ratifying the Constitution

    Anti-Federalist felt that the Constitution gave more power to central government and less to the states. Anti-federalist saw the constitution as a sinister plot by an Elite leader; “to lord it over to the rest of their fellow citizens, to trample the poorer part of the people under their feet that they may be rendered their servants as slaves.” They also argued that the constitution would become to tyrannical because the central government wouldn’t be able to run all states as a result of being too distant and removed from interest of common citizens and farmers.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Anti Federalists
    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Dbq Anti Federalists

    The Anti-Federalist had concerns almost immediately after its release. One of the concerns was how much power would be held by Congress. There was a clause in the Constitution that allowed Congress to make laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into ongoing powers. The Anti-Federalists often argued that this would allow the national government to create any law it wished. Importantly they did not want laws that would be harmful and unrepresentative for the people. In addition, the Constitution contained a supremacy clause that recognized the national government as the final arbiter of its disputes for the state which did not seem to be a fair option for the Anti-Federalists. This clause caused the anti-Federalists to believe that states and their citizens would be at the mercy of the national…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast The Articles Of Confederation And The Federalists
    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare And Contrast The Articles Of Confederation And The Federalists

    It was the year of 1787 and the country was in conflict. The new constitution had just been written and states were deciding to ratify it (Davidson, 205). This constitution would hopefully protect better than the Articles of Confederation did. As with many other situations, there were two sides; the Federalists and the Antifederalists. Federalists agree with the Constitution while Antifederalists disagree (Davidson, 205). Each side had valid arguments, but the Federalists more so. Federalists argued to support the Constitution because it allots the federal government power over trade and tax, gives each branch checks and balances on one another, and can be changed.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Anti-Federalists Argumentative Analysis
    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Anti-Federalists Argumentative Analysis

    The anti-federalist was against a strong federal government right from the start. They believed if the federal government got too strong it would just take all the power away from each individual state. The anti-federalists fought to expand the amount of representation and felt that on a larger scale corruption would be less likely to go on. Smith in his speeches states, "In so small a number of representatives, there is great danger from corruption and combination" (Melancton Smith, Speeches pg 583). Smith and the rest of the anti-federalists felt that if the representation was too small then factions will form. Factions within a government will form no matter what but factions within the most elites of society can be very detrimental to a government. John Mercer goes on too in his essays to say "The few representatives can always corrupt themselves by legislative speculations, from the pockets of their numerous…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast Antifederalists And Federalists
    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Antifederalists And Federalists

    The Federalists wanted states to act as subordinates to the national government. Meanwhile, antifederalists had strong beliefs that since states were closer with the people, they should hold more power than the federal government.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Federalist Vs Anti-Federalists
    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Federalist Vs Anti-Federalists

    They have the same goal in mind of how to make this country better, but have totally two different ways to approach the matter. The Anti-Federalists want the states to be in control. They believe that strong central government would threaten the people liberty and freedom. Their ideal government is the states and its people to be in charge, and the reason why is mainly because they do not want to have the same system of government like England. But, for the Federalists, they want to have a strong central government. The Federalists argued that, if the states were to have control, the country would be teared apart. On the Federalist #10 written by James Madison, he wrote that “There are again two methods of removing the causes of faction: the one, by destroying the liberty which is essential to its existence; the other, by giving to every citizen the same opinions, the same passions, and the same interests.” The Federalists were afraid that by having too group of individuals with power, it can cause chaos by everyone have a voice and their interests. The Federalists wants a strong central government, so it can represent the people interest. Also, the Federalists think that with the check and balance system, the people freedom and liberty would be protected. According to the Federalist No. 51, it says “In order to lay a due foundation for that separate and distinct exercise of the different powers of government, which to a certain extent is admitted on all hands to be essential to the preservation of liberty, it is evident that each department should have a will of its own; and consequently should be so constituted that the members of each should have as little agency as possible in the appointment of the members of the others.” The Federalists want each branch of the government has its own agenda and power. But, no branch can overpower the others, so therefore the people freedom can be protected because no…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Anti-Pluralists Vs Federalists
    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page

    Anti-Pluralists Vs Federalists

    The Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution and believed that it gave the federal government too much power, while taking away the power of the individual states. They also wanted a bill of rights to guarantee certain liberties, which the Constitution did not have at the time. They also thought the federal government created would not represent the normal citizen very well. In addition, they argued that as a federal government,…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Anti Federalists
    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Essay On Anti Federalists

    Anti Federalists wanted our government to remain the same; a monarchy. This would cause distrust in the government because of the possible corruption. Federalists felt we should have a central government. They preferred a government with three branches. I feel they cared more about the feelings of the people. Which is why I have sided with the federalist.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The United States Constitution
    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of The United States Constitution

    They also felt as if the Union to last there must be a stronger central government. Lastly they wanted the central government to have power that they lacked in the Articles of Confederation. The Anti-Federalists that the constitution made the government have too much power. Because the Constitution was making the Central government too strong, the Anti-federalists feared that the states would have no power. They also feared that if the president was elected again, he may abuse the power and act like a king. The federalists would also have no Bill of Rights, and many state constitutions had only one. Later the federalists promised to add the Bill of Rights if the Anti-federalists voted for the Constitution. Both the federalists and the Anti-Federalists gave strong points on why people should or should not vote for the…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution Limits Government Power To Protect Individual Rights
    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Constitution Limits Government Power To Protect Individual Rights

    They believed the constitution gave excessive power to the federal government and thought the Constitution would create a government that the people could not control. Anti-Federalists had argued that a strong national government in a large nation would be prone to the abuses that had destroyed republics since ancient times. They also believed that certain systems among the branches would eventually turn against the people's liberties and no longer protect the rights of the people.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Federalist
    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Federalist

    When the constitution formed, two groups emerged, one as being the Federalist and the other as the anti- Federalist, each having two completely different views on the constitution. The Federalist supported the Constitution and believed that the separation of powers and the system of checks and balances would protect the Americans from tranny. Also felt that the power should be spread among 3 different branches, the Legislative Branch, the Executive Branch, and the Judicial Branch. The anti- Federalist which opposed the Constitution, where against having a strong central government in fear of the government ignoring rights of majority, but the biggest problem was the constitution lacked any protection for individual rights.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics