Preview

Pros And Cons Of The Federalists

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
403 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of The Federalists
The federalist were mainly where the person that supported the constitution and was ready to approve it. Imagine living in Florida where it’s a very hot state, with a beautiful beach and many people with unique diversity. The kids running around the park without a care in the world. When you get home from a long day at work and you sit down on your favorite coach waiting for the Golden State Warriors game to come on. You see your friend telling you the warriors might lose against the Washington Wizards. In your head, you know very well this might not be true. Since you like Golden state is your favorite team and it like your home so you felt you should always stay loyal to it or even protect. Well, the Federalist feel closer to their home
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalists Vs Antifederalist Analysis
    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page

    Federalists Vs Antifederalist Analysis

    During the 1700’s, the first political parties formed over disagreements in the government. The two parties were the federalists and Antifederalists. Federalists made up the people who felt that the stronger government was better for the country and supported the Constitution. The federalists had felt as if different “fiscal and monetary policies” were a weakness for the national economy. Also, the federalists supported banking("Anti-Federalist vs Federalist"). Federalists wanted to fight for stronger governments, managing the country’s debt and ratification. Antifederalists were people who opposed the Constitution of 1788 and disagreed with a stronger federal government. The Antifederalists wanted to keep the power to be for states and local…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast The Federalist And The Anti-Federalists Dbq
    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare And Contrast The Federalist And The Anti-Federalists Dbq

    (Doc. 6) They wanted to fix the constitution, because there were many things that needed to be fixed, so we could have a stronger government. The Federalist were afraid that the United States would have bad things happen and they were trying to prevent it from happening. (Doc. 4) Although the Anti-Federalist had their own beliefs about the constitution.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argument Analysis: 'The Federalist 41 And 45' By James Madison
    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Argument Analysis: 'The Federalist 41 And 45' By James Madison

    Federalist believed in distributing equal power between the three branches of the government (Executive, Legislative, and Judicial), the national government and the states to ensure a firewall that prevented an overreach of power. Madison’s wish was to have a fair…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Federalist vs. Anti-federalist Perspectives on the Constitution
    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Federalist vs. Anti-federalist Perspectives on the Constitution

    Before the state convention, there is a great issue about liberty. One proponents of the Constitution are federalists who favor to establish a stronger national government; one opponents of the Constitution are anti-federalists who favor to establish a weaker national government. Federalists think only a stronger national government have an ability to keep the states in control. Anti-federalists think the states should have more power than the national government. Even though the conflict between federalist and anti-federalist doesn't stop, whether it is a federalists or anti-federalists, they have the same dream to united the states to become a strong country. The perfect decision is to use the best way to administrate the country and stabilize the society. In my opinion, a stronger national government will keep the country developing.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jeffersonian vs. Federalists
    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Jeffersonian vs. Federalists

    The federalists were mostly developed by high-class wealthy merchants, bankers, manufactures or professional men from New England and the Atlantic Seaboard, along with farmers and Southern planters. They admired the English aristocracy. Federalists considered the common people ignorant and incapable of self-government. They desired high voting qualifications claiming that unfettered democracy was anarchy. They favored a broad interpretation of the constitution to strengthen the central government at the expense of the state’s rights and wanted an expanding bureaucracy.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Comparing The Federalists And Democratic Differences
    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page

    Comparing The Federalists And Democratic Differences

    the Federalists and Democratic differences were that they both had a different leader Federalists had Alexander Hamilton and Democratic Republicans leader was Thomas Jefferson. Federalists, lost interception of the constitution and they, and also the federal constitution. The Federalist was in charge to protect the Tarrifs. Federalist thought that it should be educated men who should own their own property and would also protect everyone's rights. The Democratic Republicans differences were that the they wanted the limit the government power.…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How And Why Did They Create A Weak Confederal Arrangement
    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How And Why Did They Create A Weak Confederal Arrangement

    The Founders’ perceptions were that America was weak and de-centralized. They created a weak, confederal government designed to protect people’s liberties by being to small to be a threat, but it was too small to handle national problems. The differences between the Articles of Confederation and the US Constitution are that one, the US Constitution has a Bill of Rights, the power of the president is addressed and the separation of the branches. This changed occurred to make the government stronger and address the nation’s problems. The Anti-Federalists were a large group who didn’t like the Constitution but didn’t know what they wanted yet and they contributed to the branches. The Federalist were defenders of the constitution and they contributed to the bill of…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Compare And Contrast Democratic And Federalists
    • 182 Words
    • 1 Page

    Compare And Contrast Democratic And Federalists

    Federalists and Democratic-Republicans are very different in the way they think and act. Federalists had a strong federal government and were ruled by a wealthy class while the Democratic republicans had a strong state government and were ruled by people…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Federalism
    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Federalism

    We Federalist’s believe that the government needs to be divided into three parts, with equal powers and balances and checks, for it to work effectively. Now the Anti-Federalist’s believe that we are trying to give all power to the larger states in the North and ignore the needs of our brethren the South states. We are not. We are just trying to create a fair government.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Compare And Contrast Democrats And Federalists
    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Democrats And Federalists

    People often mistake the Federalist party and the Democratic- Republican party, even consider that they are the same things. There are a lot of similarities and differences between federalists and Democratic- Republican regarding social, economic, and political philosophies. Both parties were formed in 1791 and the Democratic- Republicans opposed the federalist in their foreign policy. The democratic- Republican were successful their early process, Federalists were dominating the national government until 1801.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast Federalist Vs Anti Federalism Essay
    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Federalist Vs Anti Federalism Essay

    The Federalist vs. Anti-Federalist debate has been seen time and time again throughout U.S history. The Federalists argue that a strong central government is necessary to protect the country and solve domestic problems. Whereas the Anti-Federalists argue that a strong central government cannot be trusted and that the states should have more power. This issue is an important concept today because it can be applied to so many of the debates on hot button issues such as abortion, government surveillance, gun rights, The ACA and many more. For example; in the issue of government surveillance the side that is most like the federalists in this case are those for government surveillance.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Federalist Party Achievements And Shortcomings
    • 339 Words
    • 1 Page

    Federalist Party Achievements And Shortcomings

    Examining the Federalist Party's Achievements and Shortcomings The Federalist Party, despite its many shortcomings and its callow attitude towards the people actually managed to accomplish quite a bit while in power in the early days of America. The most noteworthy accomplishment of the Federalists of the era was certainly the National Bank. This bank provided for a stable economy that could secure America's prosperity. Without the Federalist Bank, America would have floundered and quickly imploded. The Bank was the early sustenance of a debt-ridden, inflation-cursed nation. Another Federalist achievement was accomplished by one of the party's most esteemed members " Chief Justice John Marshall. His ruling in Marbury v. Madison was critical in determining judicial review and setting up the precedent of just exactly "who" got the right to examine the constitutionality of congressional laws. Adams, the sole Federalist president, achieved another great laurel for the party. While President, perhaps his greatest gift to the nation was not going to war with France. The French diplomatic and maritime agitations set all of America in a war-frenzy, hastily clamoring for war with France. Adams, realizing the fledgling US could not hope to win, kept the US out of the war and in doing so tarnished his own reputation.…

    • 339 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Federalist Vs Anti-Federalists
    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Federalist Vs Anti-Federalists

    They have the same goal in mind of how to make this country better, but have totally two different ways to approach the matter. The Anti-Federalists want the states to be in control. They believe that strong central government would threaten the people liberty and freedom. Their ideal government is the states and its people to be in charge, and the reason why is mainly because they do not want to have the same system of government like England. But, for the Federalists, they want to have a strong central government. The Federalists argued that, if the states were to have control, the country would be teared apart. On the Federalist #10 written by James Madison, he wrote that “There are again two methods of removing the causes of faction: the one, by destroying the liberty which is essential to its existence; the other, by giving to every citizen the same opinions, the same passions, and the same interests.” The Federalists were afraid that by having too group of individuals with power, it can cause chaos by everyone have a voice and their interests. The Federalists wants a strong central government, so it can represent the people interest. Also, the Federalists think that with the check and balance system, the people freedom and liberty would be protected. According to the Federalist No. 51, it says “In order to lay a due foundation for that separate and distinct exercise of the different powers of government, which to a certain extent is admitted on all hands to be essential to the preservation of liberty, it is evident that each department should have a will of its own; and consequently should be so constituted that the members of each should have as little agency as possible in the appointment of the members of the others.” The Federalists want each branch of the government has its own agenda and power. But, no branch can overpower the others, so therefore the people freedom can be protected because no…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Is The Federalist Argument
    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What Is The Federalist Argument

    The Federalists really make everything clear and put the government and what it has taken from the Americans on display. They start off by saying that what the Revolution was fought for- Peace, liberty, safety, and public good- was ignored. Instead the government influenced its own independence from its people. They begin their conclusion of this argument by stating that, the constitution is to better spread over the government and avoid selfishness between the branches. They finish off by making the fact the governments importance will expand in the time of war.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against The Constitution Of The United States
    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Arguments Against The Constitution Of The United States

    The antifederalists were a group of people who were against the ratification of the Constitution. They wanted more power in the states, and less power in the central government. The antifederalists argued that the Constitution is giving the national government too much power, that the bill of rights was needed, and if the Constitution would stay as the republican government. They viewed the Constitution as a threat to the rights of the individuals. They believed with this kind of government, the United States was once going to fall down to a tyrannical regime again. Thus, the Anti-federalist opposed the Constitution in the belief that the rights of the states and citizens can be jeopardized with a stronger national government. The anti-federalist believed that since the Constitution gave the central government too much power, if there wasn’t a Bill of Rights citizens can be abused.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics