Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

To What Extent Do the Characters Antony and Caesar Embody the Conflicting Worlds of Egypt and Rome in Antony and Cleopatra

Good Essays
1596 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
To What Extent Do the Characters Antony and Caesar Embody the Conflicting Worlds of Egypt and Rome in Antony and Cleopatra
TO WHAT EXTENT DO THE CHARACTERS ANTONY AND CAESAR EMBODY THE CONFLICTING WORLDS OF EGYPT AND ROME

The Shakespearian play ‘Antony and Cleopatra' is a tragic love story between the two characters Antony a Triumvate Ruler of Rome and Cleopatra the Queen of Egypt. The play of Antony and Cleopatra is not just a tragic love story it also incorporates a storyline of international politics, therefore making it a public and also a private drama in which Antony and Octavius Caesar contend for control of the Roman Empire. The play commences in 40 BC during this time the Roman Empire was still in control of most of the world stretching between Britain in the west and what is now known as Turkey in the east. Due to the vast amount of land under control by the Roman Empire, the Roman Senate created a Triumvate. This consisted of three rulers of Rome to try to keep the peace between the people. During the play the three Triumvate rulers are Lepidus, Caesar and Antony. The characters of Antony and Caesar become more and more egoistic, where as Lepidus stays within his neutrality of all being equal persons. There are an endless amount of codes of behaviour in which the Romans and the Egyptians embody. Romans and Egyptians conflict in every way possible such as that Romans are private with their problems/meetings, whereas Egyptians are as public as can be they seem very much open with all of their troubles. Also, Romans are organised in time and always plan any occasions or battles in which they take part, they are very precise and take time to think over what they need to do. Where as, with the Egyptians they are very spontaneous and throw party's randomly when it pleases them as if they were timeless in all of the things to do. Caesar throughout the play contains all of the new conventional mannerisms that the Romans embodied, these are such things as him being Ambitious and ruthless in his political matters, as well as how he plans battles. This is shown during the lead up to the battle scene and after the battle scene. During this scene we see how Caesar decides in that he shall not take the request of Antony to man-to-man battle, or ‘Strike not by land; keep whole; provoke not battle till we have done at sea.', this helps prove that Caesar embodies the true Roman for he is ambitious to beat Antony, so that he may take the full throne of Rome for himself. It is said to achieve and maintain empire is to be practical, far-sighted, efficient, and ruthless if necessary, not romantic or chivalrous. This means having to know oneself, knowing one's enemy and being prepared to take advantage of the moment. These are all mannerisms embodied within Caesar. They are shown through the play by the few scenes in which Caesar takes place. Rome and Egypt in ‘Antony and Cleopatra' symbolize the extreme definitions by which human beings can take stock of their lives Rome being the outer being and Egypt being the inner being . Taken together, they sum up the possibilities for human fulfilment. Throughout the whole of the play we only see one true Roman like act was when he proposed and agreed towards the political marriage when he returns to Rome the first time since he met Cleopatra. The second roman act that Antony tries to do but yet again fails on it is when he Eros would rather take his own life than Antony's and so Antony's only way out is to fall upon his sword as the final loyal act that of a true roman. Antony cannot even comply with this due to how he embodies Egypt more than Rome itself. Antony also starts the play with betrayal wherein his own country sends him a messenger but he turns them down as to try to forget about his past life to move on with his new life with Cleopatra ‘Grates me! The sum' within this line he confirms in what Philo said at the opening to the play that Antony shall turn away from Rome. We are then shown that it has begun from how he re-acts towards the news from Rome and that he actually dismisses the messenger even after Cleopatra tells Antony to hear what they have to say ‘Nay, hear them, Antony', this is rather mocking towards Antony, as if she were saying you are wanted and cannot live without them, go to them. As once said by A.C Bradley in 1905 he said that, ‘[Caesar]…has fixed his eyes on the end, sacrifices everything for it, uses as a means to it. The other, [Antony], though far the greater soldier and worshipped by his followers, has no such singleness of aim; nor yet is power, however desirable to him, the most desirable thing in the world.' This quotation gives us a basic understanding of the difference between the two leaders. The proof f this statement is shown partly in the scene in which Caesar betrays the Triumvate and backstabs Lepidus and puts him in prison, thus showing us that he will sacrifice anyone for him to achieve his end fixture. Also, in the political marriage he sacrifices his own sister to try to rid Antony from him. Toward the end of the play when Antony falls upon his own sword to take his own life, due to his knowledge that Cleopatra has died, he fails at this, as this is a loyal way a true Roman can die, he fails at this because normally they should die instantly, but he does not die straight away portraying the major loss of his Roman status, as he did not die instantly Diomedes found him after being sent from Cleopatra to tell him that she was alive. Antony then survived long enough to talk to his beloved Cleopatra, yet, in the end he does finally achieve death so in such a way he is Roman but for not dieing instantly this helps re-enforce that Antony has become partly Egyptian therefore he could not die fully Roman. Through Cleopatra and Caesar we can see the differences between the two mannerisms of Egypt and Rome. In Cleopatra we see bawdiness, spontaneous and passion, but with Caesar we are shown ambition, always planned, and cold through the way he deals with certain situations. These two put together we unearth the mannerisms in which embody within Antony, to show us that having been an old Roman and a newly conversion towards the Egyptian lifestyle that they have created this new personality of Antony and how easily lead he can be on either side. Antony lost to Caesar also because he was very old and he therefore still had the old Roman mannerisms which he embodied, where as Caesar was much younger and he had the more updated mannerisms in which out dated Antony's, consequently he had the advantage to be able to use Antony's weaknesses to defeat him as we see in the scene leading up to the battle in where Antony gets messengers to send to Caesar that they should fight man to man. Caesar then receives the message but denies it and says he will fight at sea. This is due to his ambition and his ruthlessness towards Antony and the betrayal of Antony, yet mostly just to reach his goal of becoming a single ruler of Rome by removing the other two members of the Triumvate. During the Party Scene after the truce with Pompey upon the ships of Pompey, we see that Antony showing his Egyptian mannerisms as a celebrating drunk and taking part of the four banquets as a truce, where as Caesar rejects any drinks and to join in with the others and is very hedonistic in how he threatens to slit all the throats of the men whilst they are passed out from too much drink. Overall we see that Caesar embodies only the Roman mannerisms and through the play we see that he is ambitious this is mostly to get his own ruling over Rome, he is also very ruthless politically and uses his own family for example with the political marriage of his sister and Antony, also in the way he plans his battles to go against Antony's weaknesses. Yet, he still has this need for Antony in how he is prone for battle and is worshipped by all of the Roman people and they all are on his side. Where as, with Antony, he seems to be converting over towards Egyptian mannerisms, every time he does something in the play like at the start he rejects his own duty by rejecting the messenger, ‘Grates me! The sum.' Also he is very passionate and he has honour within himself which is also Egyptian. The only most roman mannerism that Antony obtains throughout the whole play is the political marriage to Octavia, Caesars sister, no sooner does he marry her he leaves her and returns to Egypt showing that he is now almost fully Egyptian not being able to leave the country or his Egyptian lover. Antony also seems to be drunk by noon everyday in which the Egyptians being more laidback was acceptable to them but for the Romans this was very disgraceful because there was no time to get drunk with so much to take care of with their country. Antony and Cleopatra - William Shakespeare

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    In Shakespeare’s ’Julius Caesar,’ what characters say and think about each other, has a significant impact on the ways in which they themselves, are…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Julius Caesar, a conquering Roman general and the target of the conspirators, is seen as a tyrant and megalomaniac by some such as Cassius and Brutus who plot against Caesar and murder him in what they believe to be for “the general good.” While speaking to Brutus in private, Cassius reveals his thoughts on Caesar, “…he doth bestride the narrow world like a Colossus, and we petty men walk under his huge legs and peep about.” Alluding to the immense statue of the god Apollo, the use of simile compares Caesar to this massive structure and creates the image of a tyrant. However, followers of Caesar such as Mark Antony and the mob seen in Act 1, Scene 1, depict a conflicting perspective of Caesar. The stage directions at the beginning of Act 1, Scenes 1 and 2 highlight Caesar’s power and the loyalty of the public towards him. “A public place. Flourish. Enter Caesar…a great crowd following” and also “Re – enter Caesar and his train,” emphasise the public’s sense of admiration shown towards Caesar. The public see Caesar as…

    • 2867 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Roman's godlike worship of Caesar threatens the prominence of the Senate. To retain his dominance Mark Antony chooses to become a close ally to him. Cassius, Brutus, and the other conspirators however, plot Caesar’s demise. In the end, Mark Antony finds high esteem and the conspirators receive banishment and death. The play is an example, or maybe even a warning, that our actions and reactions have real effects. Brutus, Cassius, Casca, Cinna, Trebonius, and Cimber respond swiftly and without thought to Caesar’s rise and pay a heavy price for it in the end. Mark Antony sees the worth in being Caesar’s friend, and their friendship benefits him when Caesar is dead. In the play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare the principal characters' initial reactions to Caesar’s rise affect their conclusive outcomes.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    It portrays the 44 BC conspiracy against the Roman dictator Julius Caesar, his assassination and the defeat of the conspirators. Although the title of the play is Julius Caesar, Caesar is not the central character in its action; he appears in only three scenes, and is killed at the beginning of the third act. The protagonist of the play is Marcus Brutus, and the central psychological drama is his struggle between the conflicting demands of honor, patriotism, and friendship.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The play called Julius Caesar is about the great Roman leader and his rise to power and fall from power. In the play, a character named Antony was a deeply loyal follower of Julius Caesar and when Julius is betrayed by his companions, Antony cowardly took to their side, as to be allowed to talk at Caesar’s funeral. At the funeral, however, he gives a speech that turns the crowd against the conspirators. Antony’s strategies in the funeral speech proved effective and a good use of rhetorics.…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The play Julius Caesar opens on a cramped street in Ancient Rome, 45 B.C. Julius Caesar has just defeated Pompey, the former co-ruler in the first Roman Triumvirate. Caesar’s power is growing and although Romans can finally take a breath, now able to recover from a lengthy civil war, many people are guarded about the new leader in charge. William Shakespeare’s play continues as a conspiracy group forms, filled with members who question Caesar's power and ability to rule. They gain the membership of Brutus who is Caesar’s close friend and is loved by all. With his direction the conspiracy group causes Caesar’s last words: “Et tu, Brute?” (3.1.76) meaning, you too, Brutus? Caesar has met his defeat as Brutus proceeds with the last fatal stab.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Power is a theme that has dominated mankind since history was recorded. The assassination of Julius Caesar, ruler of the greatest empire the world has ever known, was a result of such a struggle for power. The foundations of Shakespeare's 'Julius Caesar' are power relationships which dominate the liaisons between characters of opposing sex, classes, and ambitions. Even in the historical context, Rome in 44 BC, the height of the Roman Republic, predisposes the play to a complex tangle of power conflicts. As the power of prominent characters builds tension, ambitions develops, and thus manipulation arises. Struggles of authority and dominance are evident between the characters in 'Julius Caesar', through Shakespeare's…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Shakespeare’s tragedy Julius Caesar clearly presents conflicting perspectives of the assassination of Caesar, a powerful and respected leader, viewed by the conspirators as overly ambitious, but by Marc Antony as a loyal servant of Rome. Brutus and the conspirators believe that Caesar’s death is necessary in retaining democracy, whereas Antony regards the act as brutal murder.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Julius Caesar Flaws

    • 2477 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Written by Shakespeare more than one thousand five hundred years after Julius Caesar’s death, Julius Caesar, Shakespeare’s well-known tragedy, is unique in that it contains two tragic characters, the senator Brutus and emperor Caesar. A play in five acts, Julius Caesar attempts to portray the assassination of Caesar, at that time victorious over Pompey’s sons, and the civil war that follows, culminating in the establishment of the Second Triumvirate. Although Caesar meets his end comparatively early in the third act, both Brutus and Caesar are adequately portrayed as men of high repute who, through flawed actions and decisions, meet an untimely end. In short, both are tragic heroes.…

    • 2477 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Julius Caesar's Legacy

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This play is titled The Tragedy of Julius Caesar even though Caesar dies in Act Three while the rest of the play focuses on the conflict involving Brutus/Cassius and Antony/Octavius because Julius Caesar really is the main topic in Acts One and Two, as everything revolves around him. Whether it be his “becoming” king, planning for his assassination, or maintaining false friendships with people that are not his friends, like conspirators plotting against him, Acts One and Two were all about Caesar. Caesar does die in Act Three, but the conflict of Brutus/Cassius and Antony/Octavius really centers upon the meaning of Caesar’s legacy. Brutus and Cassius, being conspirators, want everyone to forget about Caesar and continue on with no king. Antony…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The exposition of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare immediately presents the ideals that underpin the differing views of Caesar’s rising power through his two protagonists, Brutus and Cassius. Both characters posses different interpretations on Caesar’s reign on Rome, one being loyal to Rome and a love and respect for Caesar “I love him well” but the other being a spiteful and vitriolic towards a “feeble old tyrant.” This highlights the notion of Cassius’s selfish prejudice towards his own contentment, which is only shown behind closed doors. Brutus on the other hand is victim to Cassius’ vitriol and becomes the pawn as he is manipulated “poor Brutus, with himself at war,” Brutus is troubled emotionally, torn by his patriotism and his respect for Caesar, above all he has an undying love for Rome, “Brutus had rather be a villager than to repute himself a son of Rome.” It is this love for Rome that causes such internal turmoil for Brutus, through Shakespeare’s use of juxtaposition of characters, he is able to highlight to the audience, the lengths that man will go to in order to…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages

    •Antony is looked upon as an irresponsible kid who likes to attend plays and go out at night. He was Caesar's loyal assistant. That Antony loved Caesar there is no doubt. There is, however, ample evidence that Antony was the "sleek-headed man" of whom Caesar warns in Act I. His oration at Caesar's funeral was more than an attempt to avenge Caesar's death. It was a power grab. Antony speaks of Caesar's will. During the civil war that follows, he changes the will. Antony ruthlessly orders the murder of hundreds of citizens.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the play Julius Caesar by Will Shakespeare, Cassius and Antony were shown as two different leaders in the way of their skills in persuasion, whether they were easily swayed, and how trustworthy they were; though they both have faults, Antony is the superior of the two.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cleopatra Leader

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Cleopatra VII was a remarkably intelligent woman with great charisma and political astuteness. The ancient historian, Plutarch, stated that “to know her was to be touched with an irresistible charm. Her delightful manner of speaking was such as to win the heart.” (Bradford 14). She utilized these assets to win over the favor of two of the most powerful man of Ancient Rome, Julius Caesar and Marc Antony. Cleopatra is portrayed as being manipulative, conniving; and accused of utilizing her relationships for the advancement for power and the expansion of her empire. Although this is true, there were stark differences in the two relationships Cleopatra had with each man. She reached out to Caesar in her time of no power and continued to be submissive to him throughout their relationship. Even though there was a speculated love connection between the two, Caesar never lost sight of his priority as a politician and did not concede to every one of his mistresses’ requests. While a reversal of roles occurred with Marc Antony, she had the upper hand and he eventually became fiscally and emotionally dependent on her. In addition, he was easily manipulated, thus Cleopatra frequently got her way. Overall, the territorial gain and the power she had over him proved that Cleopatra’s relationship with Marc Antony was more politically beneficial than with Julius Caesar.…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Julius Caesar Essay

    • 1011 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During the initial scenes of his play, Shakespeare clearly outlines the distinct conflict of perspectives held by his main protagonists; Antony and Cassius regarding Caesar. Shakespeare’s representation of Antony incorporates that of a humble, loyal and devoted disciple of Caesar; embodied in his vow “When Caesar says, ‘Do this’, it is performed.” Antony’s obedient tone, linked with the concise manner in which he replies to Caesar, captures the utter willingness to serve “Caesar, (his) lord.” In contrast, Shakespeare exhibits Cassius’ bitterness and envy of Caesar as he influences Brutus’ inner confusion to the viewpoint he considers correct. Cassius provides an analogy further encouraging the traitorous desires; “he doth bestride the narrow world like a colossus, and we petty men walk under his huge legs.” Here Cassius employs a sarcastic tone to aggressively attack Caesar’s authority as a leader, “such a feeble temper should so get the start of…

    • 1011 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays