Preview

Julius Caesar Flaws

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2477 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Julius Caesar Flaws
Julius Caesar Essay Written by Shakespeare more than one thousand five hundred years after Julius Caesar’s death, Julius Caesar, Shakespeare’s well-known tragedy, is unique in that it contains two tragic characters, the senator Brutus and emperor Caesar. A play in five acts, Julius Caesar attempts to portray the assassination of Caesar, at that time victorious over Pompey’s sons, and the civil war that follows, culminating in the establishment of the Second Triumvirate. Although Caesar meets his end comparatively early in the third act, both Brutus and Caesar are adequately portrayed as men of high repute who, through flawed actions and decisions, meet an untimely end. In short, both are tragic heroes. The goal of tragedy is to evoke sympathy …show more content…
Caesar’s tragic flaw is his pride, which leads him to believe he is invulnerable to mundane threats, which ultimately leads to his death. In act one scene one, tribunes Flavius and Murellus believe that “these growing feathers plucked from Caesar’s wings will make him fly an ordinary pitch.” Although their effort fails, the statement likens Caesar to Icarus, an important figure in Greek mythology. Icarus and his father Daedalus, trapped on the island of Crete, build feathered wings and try to escape. But Icarus, proud at what he has accomplished, soars too close to the sun, melts his wings, and drowns in the ocean. Shakespeare uses this classical allusion to hint to the reader that Caesar will meet a similar fate because of his pride. Caesar’s own language indicates this flaw: “Caesar is turned to hear,” he says to a soothsayer; unlike Brutus and Cassius, who use the humble “I” when referencing themselves, Caesar uses his own name and all the connotations of power that come with it. Caesar subsequently rejects the soothsayer’s prophecy, saying scornfully, “He is a dreamer. Let us leave him.” Caesar immediately disregards the soothsayers threat, showing that he believes himself invulnerable. Because of this belief, Caesar tends to ignore what displeases him and listens to only what …show more content…
In act two scene two, Caesar receives word that the priests, upon performing a sacrifice, cannot find the sacrificed beast's heart. Caesar does not interpret this the way he should, which is to stay in his house away from threats, but instead thinks that “the gods do this in shame of cowardice.” Shortly afterward, Caesar reveals that wife Calphurnia saw his statue, “which, like a fountain with a hundred spouts, did run pure blood.” Caesar, under the sway of Decius, again misinterprets this bad omen to mean that his “statue spouting blood in so many pipes, in which so many smiling Romans bathed, signifies that from you great Rome shall suck reviving blood.” As Caesar is full of pride, he is constantly looking for signs of his superiority, and when Decius gives this interpretation, Caesar laps it up without a second thought. Caesar, who thinks himself immune to flattery, can be so easily flattered by anything that pertains to his pride. However, these mistakes are not enough to damn him. In the end, Caesar makes a fatal mistake by directly insulting the gods with the words “Hence! Wilt thou lift up Olympus?” Caesar implies that he is equal to the Olympians, and they, to teach him a lesson, send the senators to stab him. By including this line, Shakespeare provides

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Marcus Brutus’ plight is ultimately a decision to save a republic that involves sacrificing its soon-to-be dictatorial leader, with the conspiracy taking into consideration the pros and the cons of such an act. Often times the better choice is the more difficult one, especially when it involves the murder of a man beloved by all. As such, Brutus is the tragic hero of the play Julius Caesar. His tragic flaw is his easily trusting nature, and his conflicting emotions and nobleness make him one of the most renowned tragic heroes of all time.…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Roman's godlike worship of Caesar threatens the prominence of the Senate. To retain his dominance Mark Antony chooses to become a close ally to him. Cassius, Brutus, and the other conspirators however, plot Caesar’s demise. In the end, Mark Antony finds high esteem and the conspirators receive banishment and death. The play is an example, or maybe even a warning, that our actions and reactions have real effects. Brutus, Cassius, Casca, Cinna, Trebonius, and Cimber respond swiftly and without thought to Caesar’s rise and pay a heavy price for it in the end. Mark Antony sees the worth in being Caesar’s friend, and their friendship benefits him when Caesar is dead. In the play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare the principal characters' initial reactions to Caesar’s rise affect their conclusive outcomes.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The story of Julius Caesar is a time period where Caesar was the noblest men of all of Rome. It's a famous time were there was a lot of tragic events. For example in act 3 scene 1 Cesar is stabbed and killed by the conspirators at the senate. The fall of their King was a tragic event. Also Brutus committing suicide who was also one of the noblest man of Rome. A tragedy is a powerful impact in a story. Which in ties in with a tragic hero who is the main protagonist {character} in the story but they will most likely will not achieve their ends they will most likely die in trying. Brutus in my opinion is a tragic hero in the story of Julius Caesar. Brutus is a character that we learn about who he really is. We learn what his motives is in the…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    From the opening scene of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare introduces conflict. Flavius and Murellus introduce Caesar as a contentious personality, as they rebuke the “mechanicals” who “make holidays to see Caesar” and “rejoice his triumph”. The Tribunes are unhappy with these celebrations as shown through the contrast in tone when Murellus adresses the “Mechanicals” with “You blocks, You stones, you worse than senseless things!” demonstrating the conflicting perspectives within the social classes. The Tribunes believe that Caesar's “growing feathers” need to be “Pluck's” as they are concerned that with his growing power they will be kept in “servile fearfulness”. Shakespeare conveys their anger at the fickleness of the “Mechanicals”, through the use of imperatives such as “answer me directly” and “be gone!'...” as they rebuke their “ingratitude” to Pompey. This shows the dominance of the Tribunes and…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Essay

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why do honorable people end up with a downfall for their achievements? William Shakespeare with his knowledge of human nature shows Brutus and Cassius’s behaviors as idealistic and realistic in one of his most tragic plays Julius Caesar. The main theme Shakespeare uses in the play is idealism v realism. Julius Caesar the new king of Rome possesses too much power; therefore, Cassius with his realistic views tries to lead people of Rome to decease Caesar’s leadership. Brutus, a good friend of Caesar, wants the welfare for Rome; however, the conspirators persuade Brutus to their site against powerful Caesar. Shakespeare shows several examples of Brutus being idealistic and Cassius very realistic. The example of Brutus’s idealistic side is when he declines to swear an oath. Another one is when Cassius wants to kill Antony but Brutus refuses because in his mind it is too bloody. The third mistake Brutus has done by letting Antony to speak on Caesar’s funeral. In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Shakespeare uses Brutus to show his readers that a tragic flaw can lead to a downfall.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cassius's perspective is very much that Caesar is a mere man and no better than any other Roman. 'I was born as free as Caesar, so were you.' His recollection of the time he saved Caesar from drowning had a great influence on his view on Caesar, “Tis true, this god did shake.” He ironically utilizes the term ‘god’ as he was astonished that a man of such physical weakness can now have the reputation of greatness, “'Ye gods, it doth amaze me / A man of such a feeble temper should / So get the start of the majestic world.” Cassius’ soliloquy exposes his deceit and manipulation, “Well, Brutus, thou art noble; yet I see Thy honourable metal may be wrought from that it is disposed.” His play on words showing his belief that he will be able to manipulate Brutus; honourable “mettle,” as if it were heated metal being changed into something new and finally target Caesar with his own loved companion. There is an element of personal jealousy in Cassius. It is evident in his metaphorical language:, 'Why, man, he doth bestride the narrow world / Like a Colossus and we petty men' His simile of ‘Colossus’ also produces imagery of the flawed Caesar. Cassius represents Caesar as a tyrant. Cassius takes it personally and will act on the matter. Therefore, through a variety of literary techniques, embedded in various character convictions and opposing views, Shakespeare is able to blur…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Due to the complex nature of perspective, it is impossible to encapsulate the entire truth at once. Caesar perceives his role in public to be the “northern star” of Rome. Juxtaposed against this highhanded nature is the irony that Caesar has not fathered a child “Shake off their sterile curse,” showing a private frailty. Brutus emotively declares, “I love him well”, however his compassion is juxtaposed with the malicious metaphor “to put a sting in him” suggesting a wickedness in him. Both men however, are shown to have an overinflated sense of duty especially evidenced through the intra-conflict Brutus faces as “he is with himself at war” with the idea of murdering his long serving ally. Brutus reveals that individual’s perspectives of situations are manipulated by their own personal ideals through his justification “not that I loved Caesar less but that I loved Rome more”. Shakespeare manipulates the intrinsic virtue of duty into a vice that inspires arrogance in Caesar and malice in Brutus, clouding their judgement with personal bias.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tragic Hero Archetype

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The tragic hero archetype has been played with for as long as literature has been created, but no one had quite a spin on it like William Shakespeare. Shakespeare’s tragic heroes were specifically designed to elicit pity and fear from the audience and to really feel their downfall. In Julius Caesar, the protagonist Brutus is a well-made example. But the character of which the play is named after is often not considered as one. Although the character of Julius Caesar does not follow all the requirements of the traditional Shakespearean tragic hero such as Brutus, the titular character still should be considered one.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Language is a dangerous weapon in the arsenal of someone who knows how to use it. While Cassius may be no Hitler, he is good at getting his way, and for now he wants Caesar dead and that makes him very dangerous indeed. This is real danger even today; people buy into rhetoric without considering where it comes from and what the consequences of it might be. This is a very disturbing thought, one that is more than likely to make a few readers share Caesar’s suspicion of Cassius and other quick…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, the virtue of honor can be interpreted in many ways. The protagonist of the play, Marcus Brutus supports this thought shown through his idealistic view of the world and by showing his patriotism towards Rome. Mark Antony perfectly fits the description of an honorable man as he remains loyal to Caesar and avenges the death of his friend. Cassius, on the other hand, is seen as a character who lacks integrity and honor for his actions are accomplished through his personal beliefs and out of jealousy, ignoring the general good. Marcus Brutus, Mark Antony, and Cassius are significant characters that are portrayed in this play to show how their different…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Shakespeare’s tragedy Julius Caesar clearly presents conflicting perspectives of the assassination of Caesar, a powerful and respected leader, viewed by the conspirators as overly ambitious, but by Marc Antony as a loyal servant of Rome. Brutus and the conspirators believe that Caesar’s death is necessary in retaining democracy, whereas Antony regards the act as brutal murder.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the greatest english authors, Shakespeare, had developed a play called, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar which contains various writing methods. In Act III, one of the main characters, Caesar was killed by Brutus, his companion Antony had constructed a speech for the Romans about Caesar’s death. By comparing Brutus’ and Antony’s speeches, many rhetorical appeals and devices can be seen. Antony was able to gain the trust of the Romans by using Brutus’ loyalty to Caesar. The main goal of Antony’s speech is to persuade the plebeians that Caesar was not ambitious by using ethos and staying calm and emotional as he delivered his oration.…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare was an astounding playwright of the 17th century whose work has played an imperative role in literature for centuries past and will never be forgotten. Much of the continued emphasis on the works of Shakespeare is due to his ability to manipulate language in order to elicit his desired response. These superior qualities of Shakespeare have allowed his works to remain prominent even throughout the 21st century due to the fact he mastered use of language and indirectly forced the audience to acknowledge the perspective he put forth throughout his many works.…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He delivers a convincing speech on how the assassination was just and was for the benefit of Rome. The sheepish commoners are easily satisfied by this explanation and when Antony arrives he has to bellow to gain their attention. Antony then commences a skilfully rhetoric argument against the conspirators. The repetition of the word ‘ambitious’ by Antony in act 3, scene 2 subtly ridicules and discredits Brutus and wins over the crowd. By using this rhetoric dialogue in Antony’s speech, Shakespeare communicates Antony’s perspective and personality. The clash of the two personalities and perspectives of Brutus and Antony in this scene extends the drama and emphasizes the contrast of characters included in ‘Julius Caesar’.…

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tragedy of Julius Caesar is a classic play written by William Shakespeare. This play retells the events leading up to conspiracies, plot twists, and untimely demises. In the play a senator and close friend of Caesar, Brutus murders him because he didn't want any kings ruling Rome which lead to Antony wanting revenge and starting a civil war. Omens impact the play because they give signs to the characters of what events might unfold. An omen is a symbol that precedes an event and a factor of Julius Caesar because they warn him and other characters of the dangers ahead. Some characters that approach bad omens throughout the play are Casca, Caesar, and Cassius.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays