Preview

The Subjectivity of Literature and History

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2072 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Subjectivity of Literature and History
Nathan Mejia
Mrs. Kirwan
ENG 3UL-05
13 December 2012
The Subjectivity of Literature and History “Even in literature and art, no man who bothers about originality will ever be original: whereas if you simply try to tell the truth (without caring two pence how often it has been told before) you will, nine times out of ten, become original without ever having noticed it,” (Clive S. Lewis) was once said by the famous novelist, broadcaster and scholar, Clive Staples Lewis. Although this legendary man’s words are heroic, these words can be easily cast into the deep fiery pits of irretrievable lies by three significant men: The omniscient appearing founder, the scientist, and the simple desert handyman. Wikipedia is the largest and most popular general reference work encyclopaedia on the internet with an estimated 365 million readers worldwide, while it is also recognized internationally with a vast selection of languages to express the website’s multilingual diversity. (Wikipedia) With such a great reputation, Wikipedia still manages to prove C. S. Lewis’ quote completely incorrect by expressing the fallacies strewn across the internet. Wikipedia was founded and developed by a former philosophy professor Larry Sanger with his co-founder and financial manager Jimmy Wales after their launch of their previous encyclopaedia, Nupedia, did not turn out to be as successful. (Wikipedia) Wikipedia is often the reference website highly frowned upon in an academic environment due to the ability and privilege given to the website’s anonymous users to edit and manipulate data and information within each page. Although each page on Wikipedia has a reference area where other texts used to create the information presented are mentioned, these sources may not be applicable. This can occur in multiple different situations such as the information extracted from books turn bias when recorded into the Wikipedia article, or a connected website or database that has data that is



Cited: Bacon, Fracis. "Lies and Lying." BrainyQuote. Xplore, n.d. Web. 13 Dec. 2012. <http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/f/francisbac149850.html>. Challoner, Richard. The Holy Bible,. New York: Douay Bible House, 1941. Print. Dunlop, Jenna. Biology 11. Whitby, ON: McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, 2010. Print. Ganeri, Anita. The Quran. London: Evans, 2002. Print. "Genetics." Mud Sticks: On the Alleged Falsification of Mendel 's Data. Ed. James F. Crow and William F. Dove. Genetic Society of America, n.d. Web. 13 Dec. 2012. <http://www.genetics.org/content/175/3/975.short>. "Larry Sanger." Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, n.d. Web. 13 Dec. 2012. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Sanger>. Lewis, Clive S. "Originality in Literature." Goodreads. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 Dec. 2012. <http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/6231-even-in-literature-and-art-no-man-who-bothers- about>. New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures. New York: Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, International Bible Students Association, 1984. Print. Shah, Santosh. "Gregor Mendel: A Study in Scientific Ethics." Pdf. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 Dec. 2012. <http://www.nhn.ou.edu/~johnson/Education/Capstone/Ethics/Presentations/2003- GregorMendel-Shah.pdf>. "Wikipedia." Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, n.d. Web. 13 Dec. 2012. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia>. "Wikipedia:Protection Policy." Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, n.d. Web. 13 Dec. 2012. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia%3AProtection_policy>.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Website Comparison Wiki

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Wikipedia is a well-known website to many internet surfers. The word “wiki,” is defined by Britannica.com as a “site that can be modified or contributed to by users.” With that in mind, there has been great debate over Wikipedia and the information provided on this website regarding its accuracy. Even with knowledge of this debate, internet surfers still continuously use Wikipedia.org for all the knowledge that this website has to offer. As far as comparison on another encyclopedia website, Wikipedia is on top compared to Britannica.com, another website used for information search. There are many websites all over the internet that offer numerous amounts of information, but when it comes down to it, Wikipedia.com offers the greatest deal of information for all searchers.…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wikipedia's mission was to share the entire world’s information with everyone everywhere, anytime. A quotation of Jimmy Wales (the founder of Wikipedia) taken from his personal website said, "Imagine a world in which every single person on the planet is given free access to the sum of all human knowledge. That’s what we’re doing" (2013). Because anyone can edit information on Wikipedia, many different fields of knowledge can become part of the encyclopedia; it is very useful for getting a quick review of information. "Wikipedia isn't a commercial website. It's a community creation" (Wales, 2009). I personally us Wikipedia as a…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Credibility of Wikipedia

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One of the most popular websites is Wikipedia. Wikipedia, a free online encyclopedia, was established in 2001. “It is now one of the largest sites on the web” (2007, Carleton College). The difference between Wikipedia and an encyclopedia is Wikipedia is a collaborative effort with articles written by individuals around the world using wiki software that allows content to be added or changed by anyone. All material can be edited. The issue with this method is the authors of the articles may not be experts on the topics they are writing, leaving a lot of room for error and bias. According to the founder, Jimmy Wales, “Wikipedia may not be a suitable source for academic uses”. He also states, “It is good enough knowledge, depending on what your purpose is” (2007, Carleton College.) This displays evidence that Wikipedia may not be credible because there is a lack of…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lewis starts his essays, nonfiction stories, and other pieces with a blank slate that has nothing more than some simple characters and a setting. The persuasive power and rhetorical style of C. S. Lewis starts to show when he develops a plot and applies attributes to…

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Wikipedia Research Paper

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Despite the online encyclopedia Wikipedia 's global popularity and massive amount of data covering vast ranges of topics across multiple languages, the validity of the content is questionable. It is a wise decision for universities and other educational institutions to prohibit students from using Wikipedia for reference material. The well known online knowledge bank has close to 4.5 million articles in English alone. With such massive content, it 's probably safe to assume that every person with Internet access has come across one of these articles at some point in their browsing history. The webpage name Wikipedia is very similar to the word encyclopedia and may imply to users that the website is an online version…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Is Wikipedia Reliable?

    • 545 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One of the most popular sites to look up information on any topic, Wikipedia has been known for its open editorial information. Many people today distrust Wikipedia for its inaccuracy and false information. On the other hand Wikipedia is a great starting point for looking up information and veritable knowledge. Wikipedia has changed throughout the years, hiring historians to put the correct information. Not only has the site hired people to fix the problems, but also chained other site into its own proof. Everyday information is always changed through new theories and new discoveries. It is true that Wikipedia is not always a hundred percent correct but our knowledge isn’t always correct either and through this we can edit through Wikipedia. In Addition to our knowledge of what is truly right, Wikipedia is reliable because it has a great starting point in looking up information and has other sites that support it.…

    • 545 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One being that the site can be changed by anyone and that persons credentials can be unknown, irrelevant or nonexistent. The sources or references listed for which the information is based on can be invalid, lack relevance or reliability. A second reason would be what was written may not necessarily had been for academic or professional audiences. Because it is unclear how many other theories were exhausted from consideration, and ideas expressed could be based entirely on biased or opinion. Lastly I would say uncertainty of the accuracy of information provided. In example, dates can be out dated, erroneous, or not based on the facts. All the before mentioned are contributing factors to why I believe Wikipedia.com is not a credible…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Prejudice. Stereotypes. Discrimination. Racism. These standards are four of many injustices that fuel the world today. They play a major role in much of America’s history and even more so in its literature. A historically significant event that demonstrates these characteristics is the integration of the Little Rock Nine in 1957 at Little Rock, Arkansas. The Little Rock Nine were the first nine African-American students to be integrated into a public school, and were subject to a whole country worth of hatred and cruelty while attending. Aspects of this event in history are similar those in the book, To Kill A Mockingbird, by Harper Lee for they share some of the same ideas. In the first half of the novel Harper Lee portrays the small town Maycomb, Alabama, as the quintessential warm and sweet Southern town. Lee then proceeds to challenge her portrayal of this town during the second half of the book when she ruins the innocent picture to reveal a rotten other side filled with social lies, prejudice, and ignorance. This is revealed after the trial of an African American man, Tom Robinson, who was accused of raping a white woman. To Kill A Mocking Bird and the Little Rock Nine are similar in a way that they both demonstrate the brutality that the world holds for people drowning under the sea of inequality.…

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    They try to encourage contributors to register and by having guidelines that they encourage them to follow. Encouraging people to only add verified sources and to cite these sources. To keep the peace, mediate, and monitor the pages there are administrators and editors that have been elected into roles that have authority over the pages. These administrators or system operators “have been granted the technical ability to perform certain special actions on the English Wikipedia. They include the ability to block and unblock user accounts and IP addresses from editing, edit fully protected pages, protect and unprotect pages from editing, delete and undelete pages, rename pages without restriction, and use certain other tools” as described by Wikipedia (en.m.wikipedia.org). Though these administrators try, they can’t watch every edit or every page on Wikipedia. When writing an essay or doing research one should never solely depend on information found on Wikipedia. Always back up your research with other…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    7. Wikipedia: “Wikipedia ... is a multilingual, web-based, free content encyclopedia project... Visitors do not need specialised qualifications to contribute, since their primary role is to write articles that cover existing knowledge;…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    First of all, Wikipedia is easy and free and is therefore useful to people. In the article "Wikipedia as Public Scholarship: Communicating Our Impact Online" Rush, Elizabeth K and Sarah J. Tracy says “We reason that Wikipedia is a useful benchmark for online accessibility of public scholarship in that it provides immediate, freely available information to today 's diverse global public seeking online answers to questions and relief from problems.” Rush, Elizabeth K and Sarah J. Tracy use this sentence to show the speed of Wikipedia’s information transfer and influence in the world. Because Wikipedia run fast and popular, people can search the events and information about the philanthropies.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Wikipedia

    • 2926 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Wikipedia is a nonprofit web-based free content encyclopedia, open to any Internet user who wants to contribute or edit it (Wikipedia, About, 2012). It was founded in 2001 by Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger with the name of “Nupedia” and changed later to Wikipedia with the intention of adding the “wiki” concept refereed to the invitation to any internet user to collaborate to the content (DiStaso,2012). Today has around 4 million articles in english and more than 19 million articles in more than 280 languages (Wikipedia, About, 2012). It is currently positioned in the 6th place within the 10 top most popular websites around the world (Alexa.com, 2012), reaching more than 400 million visitors and more than 89,000 total volunteers working on over 2,550,000 articles (Wikipedia, About, 2012). In several occasions, Wikipedia have been criticized about the accuracy of their articles considering the amount of contributions and the facilities to add contents hard to control for their volunteers (DiStaso,2012). Interestingly, a study conducted in 2005 by Nature, conclude that Wikipedia is about as good a source of accurate information as Britannica after comparing a considerable amount of articles in booth encyclopedias (Giles, 2005). Wikipedia’s vision is to make their community the largest encyclopedia in the history and distinguish form others by collaborating with knowledge in a free and democratic way (Berinstein, 2006). Nevertheless, since the operation of wikipedia depends on their contributors and their motivation to continue participating, is impossible not to wonder which would be their strategy for remain in the encyclopedias industry and keep their community freely active?…

    • 2926 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wikipedia 's departure from the expert-driven style of encyclopedia-building and the presence of much unacademic content have received extensive attention in print media. In 2006, Time magazine recognized Wikipedia…

    • 8342 Words
    • 34 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Argument Assignment

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Presenting an argument fairly requires both speakers to refrain from being bias on their presentation. Each speaker should hear the other out in order to refute respectively their side to the argument. As a supporter for the use of Wikipedia, this site details information on any given subject. It list references as well as choices of languages for most topics. Others view the use of Wikipedia as being not valid or credible of sources. Wikipedia is a site of standard principles. Many are outlined by the providers of information. It is argued that the online provider of information is not credible due to the constant change of information.…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Subjectivity

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In “Why Do Stars Think It's OK To Sell Soda?”, Mark Bittman, cookbook author and…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays