Preview

The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
631 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control
It is sometimes hard to think about but there are people in this world that would threaten or harm us. Some of them do not even have a reason to cause harm. There has been plenty of mass shootings throughout our nation. These mass shootings have caused people to question whether the second amendment is the cause. Some people believe that the second amendment provides too much freedom when it comes to owning a gun. The second amendment states that “ a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." This amendment entitles people to obtaining a gun legally for whatever reason.

I Believe that people have a right to self defense. There is no way to entirely stop people that obtain a firearm legally from using it to murder another person. For instance if someone breaks into a stranger's house with a gun they instantly have the upper hand if the homeowner does not also own a gun. But if they possess a gun now there is an equal playing field. Take away Americans rights to own a gun then we take away their right to protect themselves and their families. Some people believe that protection is what we have the police for. If someone breaks into your house
…show more content…
“If someone is holding a gun to your head and you have a gun on your belt it is not going to do you any good because the person would react to you drawing the gun out”. However true this may be would it not be good to at least have the option to retaliate instead of feeling completely submissive and helpless? Knowing you have a gun can ease your mind knowing that if you can just get your hands on it it would be a fair fight. For me just having that as an option would be enough. Taking away our right to have an option to defend ourselves would be leaving us vulnerable. It would make those who have guns superior to those who have to look towards other means to protect

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Strict Gun Control (SGC) is defined as a “collection of legally authorized limitations designed to impose firearm shortage on the general residents” (Lance K). In the USA everyone has right to own anything or right to purchase whatever they want. In the same way people are purchasing the guns for different views. Some of them are purchasing to protect themselves and also they think that they have right to own it. Whereas, the others believe that they earn money by harming or blacking others. The best example is the death of an international student Sai Kiran Goud .On June 15, 2015 this 21 year male, doing his masters at the university in Miami was apparently waylaid by a group of suspected robbers. As he refused to give his iPhone he was killed…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Various thoughts on gun regulation have been recommended to the press, local government, and people in power at the federal level. Most of which are quickly rejected as they are expected to fail or are unable to make it through Congress due to inside politics. An idea that has not yet been pushed through Congress is allowing all responsible citizens to carry firearms with the potential consequence of a minimum five year prison sentence along with fines if the weapon is not used by the carrier in a situation of self-defense. With those laws in place, criminals may consider alternatives before violating their next victim with a firearm. This will also help to cut down on straw-purchases of firearms.…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As far as banning certain types of guns, that statement was made out of pure ignorance. Mills has written things like, “It is a moral outrage and national disgrace that civilians can legally purchase weapons designed to kill people with brutal speed and efficiency.” First off if you’re going to talk about guns, know a little something about them. There are people like Mills who want to ban “assault weapons” because they believe that they are uniquely dangerous firearms that are equal to the destruction of a machine gun. False! The assault weapons that are available to civilians are like another semi-automatic weapon, they fire one bullet with one pull of the trigger. They’re not stronger, faster or anything else, what sets them apart is the…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun violence dates back many years, around the time gun powder was first being produced in the 13th century. The first handgun was created in 1364 and was named the “hand cannon” (Hallowell 1), the name was self-explanatory. Nowadays hand guns are being produced that are smaller than the average persons’ palm, which is named the Swiss mini guns, these guns are being banned due to their extreme concealment capabilities. Guns revolutionized the world and brought high praises, until citizens started seeing the bad side of the guns. The fact that something so small can be so deadly can be frightening to people. Of course, I can see why people would not want guns to be banned since the constitution even allows the citizens to own a weapon. Just…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The issues that I am addressing is that stricter guns control will make the American citizen less safe. First of all, stricter gun control could attacking the 2nd amendment of the constitution of their right to bear arms and to defend themselves. My stance on this issues is that trickster can control can put people’s lives in harm’s way and won’t be able to defend themselves in case of robberies, and other criminal activities.…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When we look at gun-related events, such as a school shooting, or a massacre, our first knee-jerk reaction is to immediately blame guns for the crime. Stricter laws will surely stop those law-breaking criminals, right? As if the time of the writing of the article from procon.org, 49 out of the 62 mass shootings were done with legal guns. At least, that's one less crime committed, right? Would leaving ourselves defenseless while criminals acquire guns illegally instead be a better method protection? My partner and I believe that stricter gun control laws should not be passed, due to the fact that the Constitution protects the right to own guns, criminals who commit crimes with guns would likely not mind breaking another law to acquire said gun,…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The year of 1968 was also an important year for gun control. The Gun Control Act was fueled by assassinations of John F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King, and Robert Kennedy. The Gun Control Act meant stricter regulations; license requirements were expanded to include all dealers and a more detailed record keeping was expected of them. This act essentially defined those who were banned from possessing firearms. Handgun sales were restricted over state lines; the list of people who could not buy guns included those convicted of felonies(with exceptions), those found mentally ill, drug users, and more.…

    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many Americans believe that Gun-Control Laws should be enforced, because “Individuals do not need guns for protection; it is the role of local and federal government to protect the people through law enforcement agencies and the military.” (http://www.StudentNewsDaily.com) All Individuals deserve the right to carry a gun with them at all times, to use for protection. According to the Second Amendment in the Constitution, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” (https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/second_amendment) Obtaining a gun, gives one the sense of feeling safe and protected given any situation. No one knows when they may be “attacked” or in danger, and the protection they need from the government may not always be there to protect them. Every American must learn self-defense and use it when needed, they shouldn’t have to rely and anyone but themselves.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The U.S. has been in a hot debate over a tough issue for hundreds of years now. The subject of that debate is gun control laws. With mass murders and break-ins happening all over America it brings up two groups of people. One group believes taking away the guns will solve the problem. I believe, along with lots of other people, that taking away the guns will not solve the problem. We need to protect our Second Amendment, as well as ourselves, and stick to our guns.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe that the biggest problem with nuclear weapons and the public is the fear factor also. As we look back at the different wars fought there was only two nuclear bombs that were dropped. If you listen to conversations today you would believe that they had been used in every major war. According to Mauroni "there has been no public confirmation that a terrorist group has ever obtained, is about to get, or currently has a nuclear weapon, anxieties over that end-state have been converted into conclusions"(2012, p 10). I can understand wanting to have the same power as another country but I think that is where things get tricky. Look at the fact of gun control in America today. I have plenty of guns and I have always had access to them…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I'm not totally against gun control, as I do believe there should be laws in place to restrict the sales of guns to criminals and those who have mental issues. Gun control statistics and perceptions though, are skewed by the media as they seldom report on anyone who successfully defends themselves with a gun. I do believe that the total banning of guns or restrictions put in place to keep those who are legally entitled to carry guns, are ridiculous. Every American should have the right to defend themselves if the need arise and by taking away their right to own guns you are leaving them…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Growing up in the 1980’s, living in a rural area of Arkansas, guns were carried more for hunting then they were carried for everyday protection. Today, in the year 2014, living outside of a large Metropolitan city in Indiana I see guns being carried openly for personal protection more then I see them being carried for hunting. Gun Control is a topic you can hear at many restaurant tables or amongst people standing in a store. Do people really understand what they are talking about? Will stronger gun control laws help those that carry them legally? These are questions I ask when I am part of a gun control discussion.…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Four out of every 10 Americans own a gun. And nearly 3 out 4 believe that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual the right to have a firearm.” (Schwartz 2011 n.p.) Many Americans believe that concealed weapons are the main cause of violence. There have been many controversial, religious and political issues addressing gun control, concealed weapons and banning fire-arms in the U.S. that have been going on for many years. Gun Control is an action of the government that is suppose to reduce crime. The right to bear arms is Americans constitutional right; this right is ensured by the 2nd Amendment. Others believe that concealed weapons make life safer. After the massacres at Columbine High School and Virginia Tech University, the question is always the same: How could this tragedy have been prevented?…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control Pros And Cons

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One of the most conversed and debated issues in the Unites States, other than Donald Trump's hair, is difficulty of gun control. Gun control is defined as "...laws or policies that regulate the manufacture, sale, transfer, possession, modification, or use of firearms...". These laws are ideally issued by governments to preemptively reduce armed crimes, though it has been shown to be one of the first acts of most rulers plunging into tyranny. In terms with the USA, there are primarily two sides of the heated subject; Democratic, and Republican. Obviously, the "left" argument is completely moronic; believing that a ban on guns will magically end all rape, theft, and murder.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first mass shooting was in Austin, Texas in 1966 by Charles Whitman at the University of Texas. He snipped fourteen people and wounded thirty-two others in less than ninety minutes. Students used their weapons from their vehicles and helped police take him down. Democratic parties are scared to bring up the topic of gun control because they fear that they will lose votes to the people that do not want gun control. Gun laws are intended to limit the amount of guns in an area and lower crime rates, but people with mental problems do not follow those rules. They set their minds on killing people and that is what they do. If gun control became stricter, then there would still be gun violence because criminals would be armed making unarmed citizens easy targets. No one can stop them because they are set on killing no matter what. They do not have to suffer the consequences of killing the people they do because most of them kill themselves when they are about to get caught or after they finish what they planned to do.…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays