Preview

Gun Control Pros And Cons

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
779 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gun Control Pros And Cons
One of the most conversed and debated issues in the Unites States, other than Donald Trump's hair, is difficulty of gun control. Gun control is defined as "...laws or policies that regulate the manufacture, sale, transfer, possession, modification, or use of firearms...". These laws are ideally issued by governments to preemptively reduce armed crimes, though it has been shown to be one of the first acts of most rulers plunging into tyranny. In terms with the USA, there are primarily two sides of the heated subject; Democratic, and Republican. Obviously, the "left" argument is completely moronic; believing that a ban on guns will magically end all rape, theft, and murder. Of all of the documents in our illustrious republic, the Constitution …show more content…
Just to exemplify the effectiveness of these bans, the English "1997 Firearm Act" will be made an example. On the year of Lady Diana Spencer's tragic vehicular accident, a Thomas Hamilton used four handguns to horrifically murder 18 people (16 of whom were school children, all under the age of seven), while injuring 15. This later proclaimed "Dunblane Massacre" led to the English Parliament passing the "1997 Firearm Act", essentially banning all modern guns; with assistance from the earlier Firearm acts of 1920, 1937, 1968, and 1988. Since Britain's ban on firearms, it's crime has quite oddly skyrocketed. During the years 2000 through 2004, armed robbery rates escalated 170.1% higher than pre-ban, kidnapping increased 144.0%, assault rose 130.9%, murder rose 117.6%, and sexual assault increased 112.6%. Firearms were used in about 40% more than before, 3,685 recorded crimes in year 2000 compared to 2,648 in year 1997. Though England has virtually no legal gun ownership, they have one of the highest crime rates in the civilized world; 2,034 per 100,000 citizens, compared to America's …show more content…
Switzerland has set up their firearm laws so they can have a safe existence while over 25% of the population has at least one personal firearm. The country does this by, unlike the USA, letting citizens who served in the military to keep their weapons after returning home. Switzerland also has a thorough, but realistic "background check", as we like to call it; and require citizens with weapons to be taught to use them properly. In the year 2014 the country had about 170 homicides, 18 of which involved guns, making its gun crime rate 0.49 per a 100,000

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Strict Gun Control (SGC) is defined as a “collection of legally authorized limitations designed to impose firearm shortage on the general residents” (Lance K). In the USA everyone has right to own anything or right to purchase whatever they want. In the same way people are purchasing the guns for different views. Some of them are purchasing to protect themselves and also they think that they have right to own it. Whereas, the others believe that they earn money by harming or blacking others. The best example is the death of an international student Sai Kiran Goud .On June 15, 2015 this 21 year male, doing his masters at the university in Miami was apparently waylaid by a group of suspected robbers. As he refused to give his iPhone he was killed…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Various thoughts on gun regulation have been recommended to the press, local government, and people in power at the federal level. Most of which are quickly rejected as they are expected to fail or are unable to make it through Congress due to inside politics. An idea that has not yet been pushed through Congress is allowing all responsible citizens to carry firearms with the potential consequence of a minimum five year prison sentence along with fines if the weapon is not used by the carrier in a situation of self-defense. With those laws in place, criminals may consider alternatives before violating their next victim with a firearm. This will also help to cut down on straw-purchases of firearms.…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As far as banning certain types of guns, that statement was made out of pure ignorance. Mills has written things like, “It is a moral outrage and national disgrace that civilians can legally purchase weapons designed to kill people with brutal speed and efficiency.” First off if you’re going to talk about guns, know a little something about them. There are people like Mills who want to ban “assault weapons” because they believe that they are uniquely dangerous firearms that are equal to the destruction of a machine gun. False! The assault weapons that are available to civilians are like another semi-automatic weapon, they fire one bullet with one pull of the trigger. They’re not stronger, faster or anything else, what sets them apart is the…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Smith is a 15 year old student. He comes home from school and finds the police are at his house. The police then tell him that his mother has been shot and killed. The heartache, the grief, and the horror that goes through him as he hears this is unbearable. Smith’s pain could have been prevented with a gun. According to polled felons, 3/5 of them won’t target an armed victim. That means three out of five crimes could have been stopped if only the victim had a gun. Altering the gun laws we have now would make it so that more lives would be lost and would also be unconstitutional. That is why we must not alter the gun laws we have now.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although somewhat accurate information, many disagree and over 43% of Americans have a gun in their house or on their property (Social). Stricter laws on the sale of firearms may help the violence in America, but evidence shows that the guns used in 15% of mass shootings were bought legally and with a federal background check. In addition, at least eight gunmen, responsible of shootings, had criminal histories or documented mental health problems that did not prevent them from obtaining their firearms (Buchanan).…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The issues that I am addressing is that stricter guns control will make the American citizen less safe. First of all, stricter gun control could attacking the 2nd amendment of the constitution of their right to bear arms and to defend themselves. My stance on this issues is that trickster can control can put people’s lives in harm’s way and won’t be able to defend themselves in case of robberies, and other criminal activities.…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When we look at gun-related events, such as a school shooting, or a massacre, our first knee-jerk reaction is to immediately blame guns for the crime. Stricter laws will surely stop those law-breaking criminals, right? As if the time of the writing of the article from procon.org, 49 out of the 62 mass shootings were done with legal guns. At least, that's one less crime committed, right? Would leaving ourselves defenseless while criminals acquire guns illegally instead be a better method protection? My partner and I believe that stricter gun control laws should not be passed, due to the fact that the Constitution protects the right to own guns, criminals who commit crimes with guns would likely not mind breaking another law to acquire said gun,…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the Columbine High School Shooting, the government partly put stricter regulations on gun control. The guns that had been used within the killing "had been sold from Colorado gun-show tables in 1998 by private sellers who took no names, required no signature, and called nobody for a background check” (CITE). This sparked outrage, and within a week after the Columbine High School Shooting, “President Clinton introduced legislation banning private weapons sales at gun shows” (CITE). However, when it got to The U.S. Senate, they “voted to reject Clinton's gun-show bill, then passed it two days later after a public outcry” (CITE). Within Clintons presidency, he created harsher restrictions regarding gun control to better the publics security.…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The year of 1968 was also an important year for gun control. The Gun Control Act was fueled by assassinations of John F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King, and Robert Kennedy. The Gun Control Act meant stricter regulations; license requirements were expanded to include all dealers and a more detailed record keeping was expected of them. This act essentially defined those who were banned from possessing firearms. Handgun sales were restricted over state lines; the list of people who could not buy guns included those convicted of felonies(with exceptions), those found mentally ill, drug users, and more.…

    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the past few weeks, my group and I have been in a constant debate about the pros and cons of legalizing guns in the United States. This has been a constant debate that has been going on for sometime now. My group and I had the opportunity to really explore both sides thoroughly. It was amazing to find out the citizens of America were truly divided on the decision for guns to be legalized.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many Americans believe that Gun-Control Laws should be enforced, because “Individuals do not need guns for protection; it is the role of local and federal government to protect the people through law enforcement agencies and the military.” (http://www.StudentNewsDaily.com) All Individuals deserve the right to carry a gun with them at all times, to use for protection. According to the Second Amendment in the Constitution, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” (https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/second_amendment) Obtaining a gun, gives one the sense of feeling safe and protected given any situation. No one knows when they may be “attacked” or in danger, and the protection they need from the government may not always be there to protect them. Every American must learn self-defense and use it when needed, they shouldn’t have to rely and anyone but themselves.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The U.S. has been in a hot debate over a tough issue for hundreds of years now. The subject of that debate is gun control laws. With mass murders and break-ins happening all over America it brings up two groups of people. One group believes taking away the guns will solve the problem. I believe, along with lots of other people, that taking away the guns will not solve the problem. We need to protect our Second Amendment, as well as ourselves, and stick to our guns.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment has brought up major arguments in American politics ever since 1876. Was it meant to insure that people in general have arms for personal safety, or was it to insure arms for the military service only? Gun control in America has its pros and cons, but the nation needs to decide which way the government goes on this topic because more school shootings will occur and terrorists can still get there hands on them.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gun Control Pros And Cons

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In the wake of multiple shootings such as the theatre shooting in Aurora, Colorado, should U.S. gun control laws be reformed, or would that result in the violation of constitutional rights? From the day the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was adopted on December 15, 1791, giving U.S. citizens the right to carry firearms, the issue of gun control has been the subject of many debates. And the effects of more strictly regulated Gun control would be detrimental to our society. Gun control is unreasonable for the following reasons: 1) the right to own and carry weapons is granted by the Constitution and upheld by the Supreme Court, 2) the majority of U.S. gun owners…

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stricter Gun Control Laws

    • 1788 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Gun control laws aim to restrict or regulate the sale, purchase, or possession of firearms through licensing, registration, or identification requirements. With the recent abundance of mass shootings in the U.S., the subject of gun safety has once again been brought into the spotlight. These tragic events serve as reminders that stricter gun control policies should be enforced to ensure public safety. According to The Center for Responsive Politics, gun activists argue that “measures intended to curb gun-related violence, such as mandatory child safety locks, background checks on those wishing to purchase a gun, limits on the number of guns a person can buy, and raising the…

    • 1788 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays