Preview

The Four Types Of Punishment In The United States

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
818 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Four Types Of Punishment In The United States
In the United States crimes are committed every day. The question becomes what is the most effective way to handle those who committed the crimes. Every crime is different and every criminal has a different motive. Is there a way to choose one punishment or does each case need to be handled on an individual basis? Deciding the punishment is the most important way to ensure that the crime does not happen again by the same individual. The United States currently uses four types of punishment; retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation, and social protection.
Retribution can be described as, “An act of moral vengeance by which society makes the offender suffer as much as the suffering caused by the crime” (Macionis, p. 182). Retribution works to find a punishment that most fits the crime. If a person steals items from a store will removing their hand stop them from stealing again? This example of course would be considered cruel and unusual and in today’s society would not be acceptable punishment. The death penalty is the most common form of
…show more content…
For centuries, societies have established laws to protect citizens form crime. Throughout the years, these laws have continuously been enforced in attempt to maintain social order. One such law is punishment for those who act deviously. Acts of deviant behavior have been a social issue surrounded by much controversy throughout the United States. Those found guilty of deviant behavior have been dealt with through various forms and degrees of punishment. The United States justifies four types of punishment: retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation, and societal protection. These forms of punishment are society’s attempt to cease crime. This paper will explain in further detail the effectiveness these punishments have on Society, which type of punishment deters crime most effectively, and do the consequences of punishment provide any benefits for criminals and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The criminal justice system has many objectives which it intends to achieve through various punishments. One such objective is to deter social deviants by threatening them with the possibility of facing harsh punishment to pay for their crimes (Ferris & Stein, 2016). The criminal justice system also achieves retribution by responding to crime by retaliating or revenging the crime. The criminal justice system also incapacitates social deviants so as to protect members of the society through imprisonment or execution in some cases. Additionally, the system also intends to rehabilitate criminals so as to encourage them to refrain from socially deviant…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The effectiveness of crime prevention strategies has increased in recent years and many sociologists believe that this is the result of society instilling tougher punishments upon its’ members. Despite this, there are many other approaches that attempt to reduce crime. However, they also have their limitations.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Wk 8 Ccj220 Essay Example

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages

    how the offenders in favor of retribution and incarceration. There can be many ways in how it…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How to Fuhrer

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The need for harsher sentencing in law reform may appease the needed features of punishment, but stricter penalties have not been proven to show reduced crime rates and then follows in seeking to promote social values for harsher sentancing undermining us our social value for fairness and the idea of justice to the individual…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this paper the topics that will be discussed will be what are the state and federal objectives of punishment? How does sentencing affect the state and federal corrections systems overall? With support for that answer, what is the determinate and indeterminate sentencing? As well as which sentencing model that is felt the most appropriate? With an explanation as to why and examples will be provided.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Retribution: the purpose of retribution is actively to injure criminal offenders, ideally in proportion with their injuries to society, and so expiate them of guilt. An example of Retribution is the code of Hammurabi, which punishes by the theory of “An eye for an eye”.…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cja/234 Sentencing Paper

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Earlier responses to crime were to be brutal, which included torture, humiliation, mutilation, and branding. These kinds of punishments often attempted to relate the punishment to the crime, as close as possible. The first response to crime incorporated linking criminal acts to sin and developing strict punishments. Throughout the years, this thought process has changed into a more humane system. The reason for corrections to is to protect the society but also to provide rehabilitation to these individuals. Punishments for criminals now include main objectives that widely differ from the first believed aspects of punishments. Punishments now embrace objectives pertaining to deterrence, incarceration, rehabilitation, retribution and restitution.…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ideas of punishment from the post enlightenment era, such as, vengeance, humiliation, and retaliation to deter the criminal and other members of society, from further criminal activity would best serve purpose as punishment for type one crimes that are planned and carried out. Crimes that are committed with malice such as burglary and first-degree murder are intentional crimes. These crimes require planning, violent acts, and harm to another. In my opinion, the severe punishment of the post enlightenment era would deter these crimes from happening, due to fear of severe and inhumane punishment. Crimes such as assault (type two) happen in the heat of the moment and are most likely reoccurring no matter what the punishment is.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sentencing Philosophy

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Page

    Any individual that breaks the law is punished, a criminal penalty can be ranked from a small fine or community service to the death penalty, there’s no general agreement on how the courts should punish if the individual is guilty. Perhaps they’re five different types of philosophical principles that guides the sentencing in the United States: deterrence, rehabilitation, retribution, incapacitation, and restoration. These can differ in very important ways, some feel tension that punishment should fit the crime committed, but others believe that the punishment should fit the criminal. These points can influence the time about sentencing. Some people accept that they are consequences for having a criminal conduct. Finally, some of the consequences…

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moving forward, we examine the rehabilitation view. This view of punishment fails the guilt requirement because the criminal justice system would have to sort out all the potential criminals from society and attempt to rehabilitate them and attempt to make them into a better person, which would be nearly impossible. It also fails the equal treatment requirement because each criminal would require a different form of…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Indeterminate Sentencing

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Several different objectives exist in sentencing, including “deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation and retribution” (2012). Retribution is a sentencing objective that has proven to be the most effective in…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Punishment in the United States is always evolving, always changing to meet the different demands of our society. A unique aspect of our society is that we, as members of society, deem what is socially acceptable and what the punishment should be for those who violate our rules. In this paper, we will be discussing the different objectives of punishment at the state and federal level. We will also explain how sentencing affects the state and federal corrections systems overall. Lastly, we will define determinate sentencing, indeterminate sentencing and which sentencing model…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Goals Of Sentencing

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The sentencing phase of the criminal justice process is where a guilty offender is sanctioned for his conduct. The goals of sentencing include retribution, rehabilitation, deterrence, and incapacitation. Historically the primary goal has varied by criminal justice era and the crime committed. However, each sentencing goal has a specific purpose (Masters, et al., 2017). The sentencing goal of retribution is normally pursued in heinous crime cases. Its aim is to castigate the offender. In contrast, rehabilitation is a sentencing goal that seeks to correct offender conduct, by teaching offenders, skills that aid in the prevention of recidivism. On the other hand, the sentencing goal of deterrence seeks to discourage future criminality by way of…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Retribution is the theory that the criminal deserves to be punished and deserves to be punished in proportion to the gravity of his or her crime, whether or not the victim or anyone else desires it. We may all deeply regret having to carry out the punishment, but consider it warranted.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Non Custodial

    • 1752 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Crime prevention can be seen to be both disarmingly and simple and bewilderingly complex. The disarmingly simple side relates to the prosaic, obvious, every day, common sense measures that are routinely and widely taken to minimize threats of victimization. They include avoiding seemingly threatening people and places, watching out for danger, trying to protect property from predators and keeping an eye open for those dear to us. The disarmingly simple side relates to the popular notion that sufficiently severe punishment with either deters or incarcerates wicked offenders (1). Now we need to understand the importance of prevention when it comes to wicked offenders in cross reference to the question of the module, this is my first point on how to determine if non-custodial sentencing is soft on crime or not, for example I work with clients who are heroin addicts and have done for many years.…

    • 1752 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics