Preview

The Effects of Meat-Based Diets on the Environment

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1467 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Effects of Meat-Based Diets on the Environment
The Effects of Meat-Based Diets on the Environment According to study, around 2.5 million years ago, humans abandoned their vegetarian habits and adopted a more omnivorous diet in the era of the genus Homo. In 1999, researchers were not sure whether the bite marks they found on 2.5 million year old animal bones were made by humans or not. Peter Ungar (2003) of the University of Arkansas made an analysis that concluded the bite marks were indeed from the first members of the Homo generation (1). Eating meat has developed into a necessary part of human culture over the course of the millions of years. Although, consuming meat also has a big impact on the environment. One of the biggest impacts done by eating meat is the depletion of resources, especially because a generous amount of water is used for livestock. With more than 1.7 billion farm animals in the world, it is approximately triple the amount of humans (4). Research shows that it takes 441 gallons of water to produce one pound of beef, on the other hand, it only takes 14 gallons of water to produce one pound of wheat. The meat industry is one of the major reasons why we are depleting in fresh water. Ed Ayres (1999) of the World Watch Institute found the following: Around the world, as more water is diverted to raising pigs and chickens instead of producing crops for direct consumption, millions of wells are going dry. India, China, North Africa and the U.S. are all running freshwater deficits, pumping more from their aquifers than rain can replenish (2).
Raising cattle is also very damaging; they create wreckage to the environment through over-grazing, soil erosion, desertification, natural waste, and tropical deforestation to make room for farms and soy fields for feed (8). Dr. David Brubaker, PhD, at Johns Hopkins University's Center for a Livable Future, states that, "The way that we breed animals for food is a threat to the planet. It pollutes our environment while consuming huge amounts of water,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Bill McKibben’s essay “The Only Way to Have a Cow” establishes a sense of comfort as his approach to the meat eating controversy is superbly logical. The current industrial approach to livestock has birthed an issue pertaining to the sustainability and healthy feeding of our lives. Yet there is another problem in relation to our consumption, which tends to be overlooked. If the pricing of meat reflected in the damage done to our environments, feedlot beef would cost more than grass-fed beef both financially and environmentally. It is the rapid, inhumane dietary feeding of the cow which is insulting, not the consumption of it, and taking no responsibility for the run-off is an offense to the earth and it’s inhabitants. These costs alone are part of the reasoning for the current system which is inefficient and uneconomically feasible. The…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Lisa Hamilton’s “Unconventional Farmers; Let Them Eat Meat”, she justifies the issue of raising livestock for food causing greenhouse gas emissions. Should we be eating less meat or actually eating more? Hamilton’s research found many interesting points that would interest any human beings that consume meat or any other type of consumable goods.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    THESIS: “Today the most serious environmental harm associated with the cattle industry takes place on the feedlot.” (70).…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Only Way to Have a Cow" by Bill McKibben tries to inform humans to decrease the intake of meat eating and how this habit could harm our environment. Cow would release harmful substance like methane when they fart or belch. These actions could actually lead to a bigger problem, global warming. Turning into vegans could make environment more friendly. Eating grass fed cows are more healthy that eating corn fed cows. However another problem forms, grass fed cows are more expensive then corn fed grass which causes people with low incomes couldn't afford to eat…

    • 97 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The consumption of meat is a better or dietary option then vegetarianism. Not only does it have added health benefits that vegetarians don’t receive. It is also a easier harvest to produce. Author Barbara Kingsolver writes about the importance of livestock harvests and how the resources for animal harvests are much smaller than the resources for vegetable harvests. In her essay you can’t run away on harvest day she also talks about the geographical locations that can’t grow vegetables and the native people who can only survive on the harvest of livestock. David Biello talks about the resources that go into agriculture and the negative affects like deforestation or wasted produce in his essay will organic food fail to feed the world.’…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Buying any meat, dairy, and egg products is buying from the same four large companies that run the meat industry in America today. By using the Confined/Concentrated Animal Feeding Systems or CAFOs, these companies have made it to the top of the meat industry. CAFOs systems are unethical and pose a huge risk to our environment and our own health. Although these animals are being raised to be consumed does not mean they should live in small pins with no exercise, stand in their own feces, and be pumped with growth hormones and antibiotics. CAFO systems also have a huge impact on our environment, the CAFO systems have a vast amount of waste produced on small amounts of farmlands that cannot decompose properly. Causing farmers to dispose of the…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eating meat decreases our ability to have a healthier and longer life, as Perter Singer reasons “Meat is not necessary for good health and longevity” (212). We contribute to a contamination free environment and live healthy life eating meat in reasonable amount. Eating mostly vegetable is more sustainable then eating meat. This is better for nature, as we would not support large meat farms which release methane into the atmosphere. Meat production requires more water, grains and maintenance cost, where as plants like legumes improves the soil quality by adding nitrogen naturally to soil.…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many misconceptions regarding deforestation and pollution. Beef cattle are often the last that comes to your mind.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Everyone knows we are nothing without a healthy environment. Animals cannot breed without a habitat. “The EPA estimates that nearly 95 percent of the pesticides residue in the typical American diet comes from meat, fish and dairy products. (Vegetarian Times) This destroys immune systems which will lead to more disease. Illnesses could also come back.…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    While I already knew that I eat a lot of food, what I did not realize was how much of the food I eat is packaged. In the tables 1 and 2, I put everything that was a local food into a bold font. It was only one item for each week, four brats the first week and three the second. They are from a local meet market, but even they are not very sustainable. Meat is very resource intensive to produce. Many more pounds of grain are fed to the animals to fatten them up than we get in return as meat. According to Lester Brown (2011), 35% of the world’s grain harvest each year goes towards making animal protein. Brown (2011, pg. 173) also states, “With cattle in feedlots, it takes roughly 7 pounds of grain to produce a 1-pound gain in live weight. For…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Humans becoming vegan can benefit the environment in many ways and one of them is the amount of water it saves. Dixie Wills said that for “every pound of meat not consumed, 2,500 to 5,000 gallons of water will be saved”(1). Producing one hamburger uses about 1,300 gallons of water. Think about how much water is being wasted that could be used to benefit other parts of the world. If you were to produce one pound of beef by using…

    • 2018 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal Agriculture Satire

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Animal agriculture is ruining our planet. Scientists say that animal agriculture is responsible for more than 18 percent of the greenhouse gas emissions, which is more than the combined exhaust gases from all transportation in the world. Therefore, this means that riding your bike, walking or taking the bus will not help if you want to be kind to our earth. Although I do understand that some people might enjoy eating meat and that they might not feel complete without it the consequences of it has no mercy.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    How can one person can save 33,000 gallons of water a month? Some may say it is impossible, but the answer is simple - vegetarianism. A vegetarian is a person who does not eat meat of any kind. There are many reasons a person may decide to go vegetarian including ethical, health, or environmental. Vegetarians can be traced back into early history but, in today’s world, vegetarianism is on the rise as a concern for climate change is too. Major portions of the population are taking a stance against meat producing industries and changing their diets. Meat production is a huge contributor to pollution and climate change. Eating meat can also have a toll on one’s health. In order to change the course of rapid climate change, the population has…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal agriculture has an impact impact on the environment. It is estimated it accounts for 75% of greenhouse gas emissions in the developing world(walsh). About two thirds of agricultural land is used to feed livestock(Brooks). This is pretty bad I mean we could be using this land to feed the world; but instead we are using it for what? Bacon.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Even though one of the main reasons for having pollution in our atmosphere is carbon dioxide emissions, studies have shown that there are many other culprits. One of these many culprits is the production of meats as well as maintaining the livestock itself. Scientists found out recently that “raising animals for food generates more greenhouse gases than all the cars and trucks in the world combined” (Top 10 Reasons Why It's Green to Go Veggie). Livestock also contributes to global climate change due to the fact that they cause the destruction of the land and the pollution of water…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics