Preview

The Drone Age: How Drones Changed Modern War

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
325 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Drone Age: How Drones Changed Modern War
Content: the article The drone age is about the advancements and how far we’ve come with drones. Scope/Coverage/Limitations: Drones are here, they are the now, and they aren’t going anywhere war use to be different, before drones we had to risk the lives of thousands of soldiers just to kill or capture a target. In this article it really puts an emphasis on how much drones have saved many lives, and able to kill targets that were once imposable to get to. I wish the source had a statistic on and estimation of how many people have died due to drones. Purpose: The purpose of this writing is to inform the readers on how much drones for changed modern war and it’s not just the US, more than twenty other nations have lethal drones. Methods used

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In order to emphasize Harrington’s point Lev Grossman pours more light on criminal activities possible through drones. In addition to the information provided by the previous source, Grossman points out the positive and negative use of drones. For instance in the article “Drone Home,” Lev Grossman makes these comparisons through real life examples. He states that “Drones will carry pizzas across towns and drugs across borders. They’ll spot criminals on the run and naked celebrities in their homes” (Grossman 33). These comparisons provided by the author prove that drones can be both helpful and harmful. While these devices have the potential to help catch criminals they also have the power to do illegal acts that can cause an increase in crime rate.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Since the introduction of drones in war, the NY Times claims that the “CIA have not committed one civilian fatality, while allowing the troop death rate to decrease dramatically.” During the constant bettering of machinery throughout the world, the use of technology has come to a halt when it comes to an unmanned aerial vehicle. Slowly proving to be more reliable than the average pilot, in the years progressing new found respect has been shown by doubting militaries. In a HALE UAV article written by Carlos Reyes he states that “drones can fly up to 60,000 feet, being able to steadily winds at 15 mph compared to 50 mph winds at 40,000 feet.”(Reyes) and are able to outdo a pilot by almost 10,000 feet, due to the -75 degree weather. Portrayed by the US State Department as drones being useless, the use of drones has relentlessly grown to underestimated levels. A drone is classified as being “a UAV that is able to be controlled and sustain flight for numerous amounts of time, by a remote control”. The art of flying an attacking airplane remotely has made a strong peace appeal to not only the military but the citizens of the United States as well. By allowing the use of Drones in war time tactics, the innovation through this "technological leap" will help decrease in civilian deaths as well as increase in terrorist fatalities.…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    It has been estimated that by 2020, the United States will have spent at bare minimum, $39.6 billion on drones. Most people have been plagued by the mindset that because it is only a fraction of air and ground weaponry, much less anyway, America is definitely making progress. “Drones are an excellent refinement……They’re a marked departure from the 20th century game of delivering destruction on a wide scale: whereas a bomber-wing nuclear-submarine or aircraft-carrier battle group costs billions, puts hundreds of…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the main points of opposition to the use of drones is that they cause far too many civilian casualties. Anderson looks into this idea and proves that this point is widely over exaggerated by stating that the media provides false information over the number of civilian casualties and in the worst case, there are on average only one eighth to two and a half civilian deaths for every drone strike launched. By Anderson using numbers and data to back up his ideas, it makes it hard to argue against that specific side as you would be arguing against straight up facts.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ABstract Glass Castle

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages

    These armed attacks with drones have been the cause to killing major al-Qaeda leaders and dozens of lower-ranking operatives. Drones are the Obama administration’s weapon of choice and Obama has signed off on over 400 attacks in the last four years. President George W Bush, however, only oversaw less than 50 strikes during his term. US drones have killed about 3,300 al Qaeda, Taliban, and other operatives in Pakistan and Yemen. The drones allow for a pilot’s life to not be in danger at the battlefront or risked being shot down. A pilot can sit at his desk, safely, on US soil and control the drone just as he could flying it. “He can, for instance, choose a moment when his victim is isolated, or traveling in a car, reducing the chance of harming anyone else.” These pilots watch the target for days, weeks, even months to gain knowledge on the person and their routines. This…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When we're using drones, we're putting a meaningless drone's life at risk rather than a soldier's. Drones are just helpful technology that have no psychology connections to the world. Meanwhile, soldiers are humans with bonds to friends and family. A soldier dying and losing his connection to the world would have much more of an impact than a technological tool. If a drone were to get shot while entering a country to spy, we would just find a new drone. But if a soldier were to do the same, there would be a massive impact to the people the soldier had interacted with. Meaning drones are irrelevant to the…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the following “A Drone War Is Still a War” by Michael Kinsley speaks of the issue that using military drones causes civilian casualty and an unfair advantage. Kinsley addresses that we have already become used to the use of drones and that we treat the fact like a usual tactic of combat. The advantages of using drones is quite obvious. No American lives are put at risk, and the precision minimizes collateral damage, including the deaths of innocents who happen to be nearby. Kinsley states that the disadvantages are when a military option seems less painful, it is more likely to be resorted to. This makes it very easy for politicians such as President Barack Obama who are in favor of no troops on the ground to make a decision to use military drones.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Kevin Zeese and Margaret Flowers, authors of “Anti-Drone Movement Grows: Ethics, Legality and Effectiveness of Drone Killings Doubted”, the use of drones by the U.S. military causes more trouble than what they are worth. Additionally, Zeese and Flowers reiterate their points by detailing attacks which “create situations in which violence begets violence”. However, as drones do collateral damage to objects around an established target, they are able to eliminate a large threat without endangering too many civilian and soldier lives. In fact, drones cause less damage to surrounding areas, use less resources, and are able to stay on for longer periods of times than soldiers. Hence this response paper challenges the viewpoints of Zeese…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    On April 12, 2016, the Coalition for Peace Action co-sponsored the Ethical, Moral, and Faith Implications of Drone Warfare conference at New Brunswick Theological Seminary. Alongside of the leadership by Robin Suydam, the Peace Coalition partnered with local Reformed Church in America congregations in order to bring attention to our Interfaith Network on Drone Warfare campaign. This event was highlighted by drone victims accounts as well as excerpts from leading drone warfare documentaries. The evening closed with a riveting speech by former army chaplain, Chris Antal.…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drones In Warfare Essay

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Should drones be used in warfare? It’s necessary to learn about drones—what they are, and how they are used—before determining the answer. The Air Force calls them Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, or simply UVAs. There are dozens of them flying over countries like Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq, providing intelligence and surveillance. Since September 11, 2001, the US has been fighting the “War on Terror”, in which drones are used to kill suspected terrorists. Drones have changed the pattern of warfare and military outcomes.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drone Home Analysis

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Drones are capable of being used by terrorists and other criminals for their bad intentions. For example, in the article “Drone Home” on page 7, Lev Grossman points out the possible security concerns revolving the domestic use of drones.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Psychological effects of war happens all the time around us in different shapes and forms, whether we are aware of them of happening or not. Ender’s Game by Orson Scott Card and the article “Theorizing the Drones” by Chamayou uses the psychological effect of government officials tracking and monitoring the people. Ender’s Game and the article “The Mystery of ISIS” by anonymous uses the psychological effect of terror and sense of belonging. All three readings create a sense of the overlapping theme of psychological effects of war.…

    • 1457 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    These machines destroy many enemy camps that contain the Al-Qaeda in places such as Somalia and Afghanistan. Drones also “have done so at little financial cost, at no risk to U.S. forces, and with fewer civilian casualties than many alternative methods would have caused.” (Byman). In the face of the riots all around the nation, Obama has called the reduction in America’s reliance to these machines even though they will still remain the government’s main weapon of choice for international warfare. These machines have done the task of killing the main leaders of the terrorist organization that has haunted us for many years and have denied the life of many of their sanctuaries. Knowing that this information was spread around the world, the citizens of America became more accepting of keeping the production of this new technology alive and to make it as strong as ever. Although it has not been the most approved program the military could use, the biggest advantage is that it actually works and it is the most efficient program for terminating enemy troops that the military has ever invested billions of dollars for. Many politicians and regular civilians “think it fair to say that the targeted killing program has been the most precise and effective application of firepower in the history of armed conflict.” (Hayden). From this quote, the reality of war has brought upon the competition of seeing which country’s military can create the strongest weapon possible. Since Al-Qaeda has started the War on Terrorism with America, Obama and the government have worked for many months on created these drones to help reduce the risk of terrorists towards the civilians. According to Michael Lewis, Drones used for war is actually the most humane forms of warfare that could…

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    While drones contain the advanced technology to guarantee the target will be annihilated, they cannot ensure that bystanders will not be harmed. For instance, in November of 2015, the US targeted 41 Taliban men and unfortunately 1,147 civilians were also killed in the drone strike. Residents in Pakistan, and other drone monitored countries constantly live in fear of when the next drone strike could occur. Additionally, between January 2009 and at the end of 2015, the United States government stated that between 64 and 116 non-combatants were devastatingly killed in a drone strike which only targeted one terrorist. The major opponents against drone usage, Economists, argue that if the family of a Pakistani man died in the midst of a drone strike, he may seek justice on the United States. Moreover, the father and husband of the deceased family could join the Taliban to plot his revenge against our country, therefore creating an additional terrorist fighting against the United…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drone Usage in America

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Drone use within the United Stated of America has been a very controversial topic of the recent times; therefore, this article is being written to say why drone usage has become so controversial in our country, and all over the world.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays