Drone Strikes In The United States

Since the attacks on the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001 and various other terrorist threats, the United States has used unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), or drones, to eliminate terrorists or potential terrorists. The US should continue using and developing drones as combat weapons because they have less collateral damage than impractical alternatives, keep our own troops safe, and aide military generals with photography and mapping of foreign countries. Moreover, because UAV's cannot guarantee the safety of the innocent bystanders, drones obtain the reputation of creating more terrorists than they tend to eliminate and not only do drone strikes violate the sovereignty in other countries, they also violate the rights of basic human rights. Consequently, drones may be perceived differently in the eyes of Americans and Pakistanis.
The
While drones contain the advanced technology to guarantee the target will be annihilated, they cannot ensure that bystanders will not be harmed. For instance, in November of 2015, the US targeted 41 Taliban men and unfortunately 1,147 civilians were also killed in the drone strike. Residents in Pakistan, and other drone monitored countries constantly live in fear of when the next drone strike could occur. Additionally, between January 2009 and at the end of 2015, the United States government stated that between 64 and 116 non-combatants were devastatingly killed in a drone strike which only targeted one terrorist. The major opponents against drone usage, Economists, argue that if the family of a Pakistani man died in the midst of a drone strike, he may seek justice on the United States. Moreover, the father and husband of the deceased family could join the Taliban to plot his revenge against our country, therefore creating an additional terrorist fighting against the United