The Pros And Cons Of Using Drones

There's an explosion, it kills some soldiers but it mostly just destroys some drones in the area. A drone is an unmanned ship controlled remotely. It's morally correct to use drones because it reduces the chance of harming our soldiers, it shows loyalty to our troops, and it's fair for us to use the resourceful technology available to us. If we're using drones rather than soldiers, it's putting fewer soldiers at risk to be harmed. It's not showing loyalty to our country when we're defending the opponent. It's also fair for us to use our technology to our advantage; it's not our problem if other countries lack supplies.

When we're using drones, we're putting a meaningless drone's life at risk rather than a soldier's. Drones are just helpful technology that have no psychology connections to the world. Meanwhile, soldiers are humans with bonds to friends and family. A soldier dying and losing his connection to the world would have much more of an impact than a technological tool. If a drone were to get shot while entering a country to spy, we would just find a new drone. But if a soldier were to do the same, there would be a massive impact to the people the soldier had interacted with. Meaning drones are irrelevant to the
If we aren't throwing our soldiers out to get killed, it's being loyal by preserving their lives. Also, if we're worried about the opposing countries being unable to defend themselves, we're not being to our country. When we use drones rather than soldiers, it's safer for the soldier's life because they're not at risk to be shot at or blown up as often. But when we're upset over the unfairness over a rival country's supply deficiency, we're being disloyal to our country. We should be proud of our ability to access warfare technology and to protect our soldiers rather than worrying about the insufficiency of the other's. It's loyal to defend the soldiers in our country and to be