Preview

The Big Bang The Evolution Of Negot

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
487 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Big Bang The Evolution Of Negot
Essay #?
2014
The big bang: The evolution of negotiation research

Summary
Today I was reading a brief article for my Leadership Skills course titled “The big bang: The evolution of negotiation research”, which tried to prove that “Getting to Yes”, a book written by Roger Fisher and William Ury, developed and facilitated the study of negotiation by citing some of the most influential empirical research on negotiation.

The fundamental elements of Getting to Yes are: people, interests, options, criteria, the BATNA principle, and soft versus hard bargaining style. The main points about people are that the research shows that negotiators are more likely to allocate resources equally, rather than selfishly. Also emotions not only affect the negotiator experiencing them, they can also create emotional reactions in other parties. Furthermore, what matters most in understanding conflict is not reality itself but individuals’ perceptions of it.

As for interests, it is noted that to invent a creative solution to a problem, you first have to figure out the interests underlying the parties’ perspective positions. In order to do so, you have to get the better of a key error: the fixed-pie perception, which refers to the often-faulty belief that people’s interests are basically and directly represents a loss for the other parties.

With respect to options, mutual gains benefit both parties. In order to create options for mutual gain, negotiators need to overcome four obstacles that prevent opportunities, which increase bargaining value and develop the relationship. The first obstacle is fixed-pie perception, which was mentioned above. The Second obstacle is making premature judgment: at times, negotiators commit to a specific course of action and then find it difficult to change course even if doing so could yield a better, mutually beneficial outcome. The third obstacle is they tend to search for a single answer. The final, most important, obstacle is Negotiator A often

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In chapter 11, the book expanded on the information from chapter 10. The focus was on the unanswered questions that chapter 10 left out there. People make cognitive mistakes when they are involved in negotiation. There are six areas that the chapter described, mythical fixed pie of negotiation, framing of negotiator judgement, nonrational escalation of conflict, overestimating one’s value, self-serving bias, and anchoring bias. These areas are a theoretical trap for negotiators, and they must be avoided in order to correctly negotiate.…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emotions in Negotiations

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages

    * Negotiation is often not a way to discuss an issue but a way to learn more about the other part and increase interdependence. In a relationship, gathering information about the other’s ideas, preferences and priorities is often the most important activities.…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Wilson, S. R. 1992. Face and framework in negotiation. In Communication and negotiation, edited by L.L. Putnam and M.E. Roloff, 176-205. Newbury Park, CA: Sage…

    • 3095 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Discussion1

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Review the article, "DRT Interview: Roger Fisher and Daniel Shapiro on Negotiating," paying particular attention to the role of emotion in negotiation.…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    PeachvsCampusComputers

    • 2636 Words
    • 8 Pages

    was my goal to focus on collaborative negotiation strategies. I have been involved in a huge number of…

    • 2636 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Quiet American Conflict

    • 2621 Words
    • 11 Pages

    * What are the reasons behind conflict between people? Is compromise always the best solution? Can it bring out the best in people? Listening? Understanding? Resolving? Conflict can also be solved by ‘winning’ – when one person’s wishes compromise another’s. Conflict can be avoided as well.…

    • 2621 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The single biggest danger in negotiation is not failure but to be successful without knowing why you are successful. -Jens Thang…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the Bargaining Table

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Most negotiators leave the bargaining table believing they were better at pushing the other side to its limits. At the bargaining table, most people tend to believe that they received a greater percentage of the pie. If a negotiator cogitate that they have the greater share, they will rarely stop to scrutinize their skills. Most individuals overestimate the degree to which they will make trade-off in a negotiation. These behaviors patterns of…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    EDocs Study Questions

    • 1337 Words
    • 4 Pages

    on the logical coherence of your negotiating strategy and answers to the poll questions (as…

    • 1337 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Getting to Yes Analysis

    • 1121 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Whether or not we are aware of it, each of us is faced with an abundance of conflict each and every day. From the division of chores within a household, to asking one's boss for a raise, we've all learned the basic skills of negotiation. A national bestseller, Getting to Yes, introduces the method of principled negotiation, a form of alternative dispute resolutions as opposed to the common method of positional bargaining. Within the book, four basic elements of principled negotiation are stressed; separate the people from the problem, focus on interests instead of positions, invest options for mutual gain, and insist on using objective criteria. Following this section of the book are suggestions for problems that may occur and finally a conclusion. In this journal entry I will be taking a closer look at each of the elements, and critically analyse the content; ultimately, I aim to briefly bring forth the pros and cons of Getting to Yes.…

    • 1121 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lewicki, R., Barry, B., & Saunders, D. (2006). Essentials of Negotiation, 4th edition. McGraw-Hill. Learning Solutions. New York, NY. Retrieved from http://digitalbookshelf.argosy.edu/…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dispute Resolution - Law

    • 1864 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Principled negotiation offers perhaps a better way of reaching good agreements. This process can be used effectively on almost any type of conflict. Fisher and Ury developed four principles of negotiation.…

    • 1864 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before the role play, I was stuck with the thought that negotiation is purely about exchanging resources that mutually benefit both parties. However, my understanding of negotiation has jumped to the next level after the activity since it provided me the insight of choosing the right influencing tactics to match the characteristics of the target audience…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are four points of this style of negotiation: ‘people: separate the people from the problem’, ‘interests: focus on interest, not positions’ ‘options: generate a variety of possibilities before deciding what to do’, and ‘criteria: insist that the result be based on some objective standard’ .The core of this style of negotiation is that we should be hard to the substance problem and be soft to the other party. If the other tries to threaten us, two authors taught us we can block off the communication of the threat information. Maybe the best way is to ignore it. Sometimes just keep silence. The magic of silence is…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The authors stress the importance of knowing an opponents interests and the qualities of those interests imperative to achieving a successful negotiation. The clear benefits/gain must be appealing enough to an opponents personal interest to consider. Only by knowing and understanding the interests, motives and likely behaviors of an opponent, make it possible to identify what leverage would enable the acceptance of a proposed offer.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays