Preview

Deal With The Other Party Who Goes To Bully You In Three Negotiation Style Analysis

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1495 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Deal With The Other Party Who Goes To Bully You In Three Negotiation Style Analysis
How to Deal with the Other Party Who Tries to Bully You in Three Negotiating Styles

1. Introduction When politicians sought to resolve the nuclear-weapon problem in Korean Peninsula, they would apply plenty of negotiating strategies in the six-party talks. Numerous news report as such made some people assume that negotiation is far away from our ordinary people. However, the fact is that negotiation happens in our daily life every day. For example, if your daughter does not like eat vegetables, there will be a negotiation between you and your daughter. You may apply skills consciously or unconsciously. The common example is carrots and sticks tactics. The mother would often said to her daughter: ‘if you eat these vegetables, I will allow you watch two episodes of Peppa Pig. If you don’t, you cannot watch any cartoons.’ Most of time it is very easy to persuade your daughter. Because you are in the powerful position comparing to your daughter. if you were the position of daughter, what you should do in the negotiation. In the countless negotiations in our life, one of the most difficult negotiations may be the one with the other party who tries to bully you. In the following paragraphs, I would like to discuss how to deal
…show more content…
There are four points of this style of negotiation: ‘people: separate the people from the problem’, ‘interests: focus on interest, not positions’ ‘options: generate a variety of possibilities before deciding what to do’, and ‘criteria: insist that the result be based on some objective standard’ .The core of this style of negotiation is that we should be hard to the substance problem and be soft to the other party. If the other tries to threaten us, two authors taught us we can block off the communication of the threat information. Maybe the best way is to ignore it. Sometimes just keep silence. The magic of silence is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The overall message was to remain calm, structure the discussion in ways that you can win. There is no win-win in a negotiation. Someone must be on the losing side, even if they think they are not. We must stay ahead of the other person, and consider the outcomes that are possible. The traps that come with overthinking negotiation must be avoided at all costs. We must identify the errors in the process prior to entering into any negotiating. We must use descriptive models and anticipate every move in order to be…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Describe and define the "positive bargaining zone" and the "negative bargaining zone." “Negotiation is not a policy. It's a technique. It's something you use when it's to your advantage, and something that you don't use when it's not to your advantage.” (Bolton) Although they do not always have a common ground, the structure of the bargaining process usually refers to having either an integrative or distributive task. This is how and why there are positive and negative bargaining zones and how they will influence or break a negotiation process.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    My preconception about negotiation was delivering the information that I want to deliver and my focus was on what I can offer as well as what I can get from the other party. Nevertheless, it does not work out well in the activity. Before the negotiation, my natural preferences for influencing tactics would be having informal conversation with my subordinates and hoping that they can understand and obey the regulation, but if it does not work out that way then formal talk with legitimized appeal will be arranged. During the negotiation, I noticed that rational talk did not work at least effectively. Interestingly, both of the two targets promised to obey orally but in fact they were less likely to wear safety glasses because they thought the talk was not for…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Getting to Yes Analysis

    • 1121 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The first method of principled negotiation is to separate the people from the problem. Although it seems to be quite a simple process, I found a major question came to mind: "What if the people are the problem?". Being a teenager, I know that sometimes the only reason for conflict is emotions and feelings. A person feels they have been wronged, the other disagrees, and separating the people from the problem becomes virtually impossible. Getting to Yes briefly proposes some solutions to emotion, such as…

    • 1121 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this case, negotiation is viewed neither strictly as a computational formalism nor as a mathematical game, but as a problem solving task Therefore, when negotiators engage in such a game, they in fact, are relying on the normal problem solving apparatus for cognitive tasks. Two negotiators together attempt to obtain a solution to which both parties stand to benefit. The task of negotiation described below involves two parties (a dyad; in this case and throughout the model description I will take the place of the dyad and…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This paper discusses my natural preferences for influencing tactics, my views on negotiation compared to my prior knowledge, my future work on negotiation and some opinions about the role play activity.…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Negotiation Planning As a negotiation-case, which was hold as a classroom exercise with a random partner, I assumed that this was a one-time negotiation between me and my negotiation partner with less importance of our relationship. For this reason, I tried to get the best outcome by choosing the strategy of competition and ignored the fact that in a real life situation, this negotiation of course might have consequences and linkages to further negotiations between these 2 parties.…

    • 2456 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Dynamics of Power and Persuasion Characterized by multiple parties with interdependent goals, the negotiation process can involve a number of strategies and tactics that help parties maximize their outcomes. Some of the most useful and versatile of these strategies are forms of persuasion. Persuasion aims to change the behavior, attitudes, or beliefs of another party in some way for the benefit of the persuader, but how can one effectively use such a strategy in a negotiation scenario? Persuasion is an activity made necessary by the fact that all of us differ in our goals and there are many ways that one can go about achieving them. We all take part in persuasive activity throughout our regular social interactions every day. There is a great deal of skill and planning that goes into effective persuasion and there are many techniques one can use to implement it productively during a negotiation. However, there are many pitfalls to this tactic and if used haphazardly can leave one in a position that makes them look much less credible in a negotiation, hurting one’s chances of achieving their desired outcome.…

    • 2957 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Getting to Yes

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages

    "Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In" By: Peter Block Written: 11/28/05 For our book report for IS Planning and Management, we were to read and review, Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In, by Roger Fisher, William Ury, and Bruce Patton. The book was written to educate readers on how to become better, more effective negotiators. They start with defining the difference between positional negotiations versus principled negotiations. They then move on describing their four principles for effective negotiation: People, Interests, Options, and Criteria. Additionally, they describe three common obstacles to negotiation - when the other party is more powerful, what if they won 't play, and when the other party uses dirty tricks - and discuss ways to overcome those obstacles. They also emphasize that all four negotiation principles should be used throughout the negotiation process. Finally, the team of authors answers ten commonly asked questions. In this review we will touch briefly on these points.…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Getting Past No - A Critique

    • 3431 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Clarkson Univeristy – OS 666 Getting Past No A Critique Aaron Cubells 10/15/2013 In his book titled Getting Past No, William Ury encompasses the key elements that cultivate successful negotiation. He is able to step back and fundamentally view the dynamics between the two separate parties, which in turn allows him to formalize and explain a systemic set of guidelines that can be utilized to successfully negotiate. The tools he conveys are infinitely beneficial, especially since there are countless underlying forces that set each negotiation apart from one another. This leaves one to conclude that successful negotiation is truly an art in and of itself. Ury breaks down this art of successful negotiation into a “five step breakthrough strategy” that functionally operates to reach the ultimate goal: an agreement that truly satisfies both parties’ interests. First, one must become accustomed to not reacting and “going to the balcony” to keep their eye on the prize. Next, it is vital to disarm the opponent by stepping to their side and acknowledge where they are coming from. Within the third step, it is time to “change the game” by reframing the opposing party’s position, which avoids rejecting it completely. Subsequently, one has to make it easy for their opposition to say yes instead of no, or in Ury’s words, “building them a golden bridge.” The last step builds on its predecessor by making it hard for the other party to say no—bringing them to their senses, not their knees. This systematic approach to negotiating is abstract and not traditional, but these strategies can be used in the real world and hold priceless value. The following paragraphs explore these specific strategies and attest their relevance.…

    • 3431 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The compromising strategy is moderate assertiveness and moderate cooperation. Using the compromising strategy there is no clear winner or loser. The compromising strategy is defined as “giving up more than you want”. This strategy is used as a temporary solution to the conflict not a permanent one, which could create a bigger problem later. The compromising strategy is good for when there are time constraints and the conflict needs to be resolved fast.…

    • 758 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: B a r c l a y S.B. a n d P e t e r s o n , C. "Multi-attribute Utility Models for Negotiators," Technical Report 76-1, McLean, Virginia: Decisions and Designs, Inc., 1976. B o w e r , J.L. Managing the Resource Allocation Process. H o m e w o o d , II1.: Irwin, 1972. D e u t s c h , M. and K r a u s , R.M. "Studies of Interpersonal Bargaining,"Journal o f Conflict Resolution 6 (1962): 52-76. D o n a l d s o n , G, a n d L o r s c h , J.W. Decision Making at the Top. New York: Basic Books, 1984. F i s h e r , R. and Ury, W.L. Getting to YES: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1981. G r e e n h a l g h , L. and N e s l i n , S.A. "Conjoint Analysis of Negotiator Preferences." Journal of Conflict Resolution 25 (1981): 301-327. G u l l i v e r , P.H. Disputes and Negotiations: A Cross Cultural Perspective. New York: Academic Press, 1979. K e e n e y , R. and Raiffa, H. Decisions With Multiple Objectives. New York: Wiley, 1976. K o t t e r , J. Power and Influence. New York: Free Press, 1985. N e u s t a d t , R.E. Presidential Power, 4th ed. New York: Wiley, 1980. R a i f f a , H. The Art and Science o f Negotiation. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1982. R u b i n , J.Z. and B r o w n , B.R. The SocialPsychology of Bargaining and Negotiation. NewYork: Academic Press, 1975. S c h e l l i n g , T.C. The Strategy o f Conflict. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1960. S e b e n i u s , J . K . Negotiating the Law of the Sea. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1984. T e d e s c h i , J.T., S c h l e n k e r , B.R. and B o n o m a , T.V. Conflict. Power, and Games. Chicago: Aldine, 1973.…

    • 12580 Words
    • 51 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Business Negotiation

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Narendra Kumar Singh 0952523 Turnitin Id: 6760657 BUSINESS NEGOTIATION ‘‘Negotiation is a process of interaction by which two or more parties who consider they need to be jointly involved in an outcome, but who initially have different objectives, seek by the use of argument and persuasion to resolve their differences in order to achieve a mutually acceptable solution’’. (Fowler, 1999)…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Q movie analysis

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Persuasion is a concept evident in both scenes, and it has to do with one party causing another party to do something that it wants through reasoning or argument. Persuasion can be used to balance power in a negotiation. The hardball tactics of aggression and intimidation are evident in both scenes as well. Aggression is the relentless push for more concessions, while intimidation is the attempt to force the other party to agree by means of emotional play. There is also evidence of power play in the scenes, namely legitimate power and coercive power. Legitimate power is derived from ones position and Coercive power derived from the ability to punish others. (Lewicki, 2004)…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. Critique the idea of interdependency in negotiation. ”One of the key characteristics of a negotiation situation is that the parties need each other in order to achieve their preferred objectives or outcome. That is, either they must coordinate with each other to achieve their own objectives, or they choose to work together…

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays