Preview

Summary Of Thomson's Metaphor

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
622 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of Thomson's Metaphor
In Thomson's violinist analogy, an innocent person is kidnapped and forced to use her body in order to save the life of someone else. In this situation, a person is captured by the Society of Music Lovers and wakes up in bed to finds themselves attached to a famous violinist. The violinist is unconscious and turns out he has a fatal kidney ailment. His fans found out this person's blood type is the only one who can save him. Involuntary, the violinist's circulatory system is attached to the person's body as life support and this has to occur for the next 9 months so the violinist can be healthy again. The director of the hospital apologizes for their outrageous action, but informs you that the two bodies are already connected and if you remove the rube now it will kill the violinist instantly. If you wait the 9 months, both of you will be safe and able to leave.

In this case, Thomson uses this analogy to specifically defends abortion if rape was the reason for the conception of a child. The person was kidnapped and their autonomy was disregarded. The innocent person never volunteered to save the violinist or for him to use their kidneys. Therefore, Thomson believes
…show more content…
Thomson made her assumptions very clear through the different situations she gave to when abortion can be justified. She proves the moral permissibility to abort a fetus in three different scenarios and gave reasons to why abortion is never immoral. Under certain circumstances, despite all situation not being unjust, many still question the ethical principles behind abortion. Although everyone is given the 'right to life', morally it would be unaccepted to force others to carry on a life they do not want in their body. For example, going back to the violinist. If the innocent person is forced to help safe the violinist, it goes against her autonomy and one moral principle should not outweigh

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    1 )The relationship between Thompson’s and Marquis’ arguments are very different, but I believe both are compatible with each other. They both take the personhood out of the question, so there is no debate on if the fetus is a human in the womb. Marquis discusses voluntary conception and Thompson does not really discuss that. Thompson’s conclusion deals more with the exceptional cases that Marquis doesn’t explain at all. Thompson weighs the rights of the individuals involved in the pregnancy like the mother and fetus against each other. Marquis, on the other hand, focuses on the concept of what makes killing wrong thus killing a fetus that could possibly have a future like ours is bad. His conclusion focuses on the rights of the victim in the mother/fetus situation. The mortality of the situation in both arguments deals with which person’s rights out ways the other’s. In Marquis, the fetus’ rights outweigh the mother’s rights. In Thompson’s argument, the mother’s rights can trump the fetus’ rights in certain circumstance.…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What man played a key role in Vermont becoming a state? Here’s a hint! It begins with an E and ends with a N. He was a revolutionary figure.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    However, the duration the violinist needs to remain plugged in cannot determine the actions of the person kidnapped. While this is the entirety of her clarification, she realizes her opponents will disagree as long as a human life is being used in the analogy. Therefore, she presents a more palatable analogy: the boys and chocolate. If two boys were given one box of chocolate to share, it would be unjust for the older to take it all for himself. It is unjust only as the boys were given equal part of the chocolate.…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    PHL 292 - Exam 1 Study Guide

    • 2595 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Thomson argues that a mother and child are (during pregnancy) not “two tenants in a rented house mistakenly rented to both” but rather the mother owns the house. The purpose of this analogy is to reveal that other parties cannot claim to be impartial when they claim they cannot decide who of the two (mother/child) should live.…

    • 2595 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomson Handout 1

    • 951 Words
    • 3 Pages

    She considers the view that the right for the mother to live is just as equal as for the fetus to be born. Also, he considers, if an action is to be made, killing someone would be murder.…

    • 951 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The statement "defense of abortion", gives us an another view to a problem of abortion. Mostly, Judith Jarvis Thompson protects pro-choice side, and she says that abortion is not immoral, and that it is logically correct action. However there are a lot of anti-abortion philosophers who are not agree with it. So Judith Thompson gives an arguments to proof her sides correctness. She says that mother has all rights to do anything with her body and things in her body. Judith Jarvis Thompson also believes that fetuses are not persons, and killing them is not immoral. However she says that there are also situations, when abortion is incorrect. Also she gave 3 main thought experiments to get another point of view to abortion.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    She doesn’t think that the fetus is in fact morally human, but for the sake of the argument accepts this principle. She then comes up with her own version of the Pro-Life view. She temporally goes along with the argument that the fetus is a human and that it has a right to live, but then she argues that a woman has a right to decide on whatever she wants to have happen to her body (this would be the controversy to this theory) but still the fetus has a better propriety than the mother because the right to life is more important than any non-tangible options. Therefore, the fetus cannot be killed. She then gives a very extreme example known as “The Violin Player Analogy”. Here, this states that theoretically an individual goes to a concert and suddenly this individual blacks-out because somebody shoots them with a tranquillizer gun, or something similar. The individual wakes up connected to the musician that they went to see. The individual must then stay connected to this musician for nine months to keep them alive until a transplant could come in. Here, she reaches the argument that most would say it is okay to just get up and leave. She explains that the individual is like a mother and that a fetus needs the mother to survive like the violin player, therefore if the mother does not want to let someone use her body for nine months, she does not have to let the fetus use…

    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marquis believes that abortion is “morally unjustified” (525). His argument is that “it is wrong to kill us because such killing deprives us of all the value of our futures” (525). He also argues that fetuses are close enough to being like us and that is it just as wrong to kill them as it is to kill us. The conclusion of his argument is that not all abortions are wrong since there may be other conditions in some cases such as “abortion before implantation, when the life of the woman is threatened by a pregnancy or abortion and abortion after rape”…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the title makes plain, Thomson asserts that abortion is not impermissible. More exactly, she argues for the conclusion that at times, abortion is permissible; she asserts that there are scenarios in which getting an abortion would be immoral. What is especially innovative is the way in which her argument is constructed by Thomson. She starts the essay by pointing out the argument over abortion seems to numerous individuals to hinge on whether the fetus is a man. Most feel that if we could simply discover the response to that puzzle, the consequences for abortion would be clear; namely, that if fetuses are not individuals then, and that if fetuses are persons afterward abortions should be impermissible abortions must be allowable (Thomson, 1984).…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    By treating the fetus as a person, she takes into account the rights of both the mother and the fetus. However, she doesn’t base her arguments on possible futures, like Marquis- instead she compares their situations (one party growing within, the other being forced to house it), personal rights, and responsibilities to one another (if any). What was particularly convincing to me about her argument was how she argued that abortion does not need to be decent or unselfish to be morally permissible. This removes a lot of the responsibility of a mother to keep an unwanted fetus just to be a “good person”, rather than end their unwanted pregnancy. Thompson’s definition of the right to life was also significant to me.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A problem with Thomson’s argument is why others should have to admit to the fact that a woman has no more obligation to her own child than she has to a violinist that she has never met before and doesn’t even know? Therefore, she is saying that the mother doesn’t have a commitment to her child that has yet to be born than she does to people whom she doesn’t know, especially in the case where the mother has been raped. Another problem that Thomson states in her piece of writing is that if own possessions then you have the right to it. Hence, no one has the right to the possession unless you were to give it to them. In Thomson’s analogy, the violinist is sick, but in the case of an abortion the fetus is not sick. If the fetus were to be removed it would die and according to Thomson it is considered death when something is taken out of its environment it’s the ordinary means for sustaining their life. In…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomson Abortion

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Johnson starts off by going back to history telling the audience Roe v. Wade was announced during the "Dark Ages" stating "In the ensuing decades, knowledge regarding the development of unborn humans, and their capacities at various stages of growth, has advanced in quantum leaps." (Johnson), putting an example of why doctors should administer anesthesia into an unborn child around twenty weeks of pregnancy. Thomson's article starts off by explaining the alteration between baby rights and mother's rights coming from her very own perspective. She begins with how a woman has the right to choose her own lifestyle and how they want to live as long as it does not take away someone else's right to live and jumping straight to facts explaining her reasons. A difference between Johnson's and Thomson's articles is that Thomson gives her own analogy for her choice and debate on abortion and describes it as "...someone waking up strapped to a famous, but unconscious violinist." (Thomson). She uses this analogy to give the audience a different and better view on abortion. Thomson also uses number of rebuttals on her arguments and debates after each one of her paragraphs from each content. The two articles contrast in using examples. Thompson brings out more examples and has a bigger argument with abortion and the…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In her paper “A Defense of Abortion” she argues that a mother’s rights can sometimes be more important than a fetus’s right to life. Thomson illustrates this argument with a thought experiment involving a famous violinist and a musician society. So a music society kidnaps you and you wake up hooked to a famous violinist. The violinist has a blood disorder, and the only way for him to survive is to keep him hooked up to your kidneys for nine years. You have no moral obligation to keep yourself hooked to the violinist because his right to life isn’t more important than your own life.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Susan Heath, a seventy two year old opinionist of New York Times, wrote the article “No One Called Me a Slut” about how she was able to successfully get her abortion done in 1978 without being criticized for her decision. Susan Heath implied, through presenting us with proper reasons behind her decision to abort her child, that she has a moderate view on the topic of abortion. According to the article, Susan was already a mother of four children before her contraception failed her and presented her with the dilemma of bearing a fifth child. Susan explained that she loved her children with a passion however she didn’t want anymore. Hurthouse would in all likelihood deem this to be a virtuous decision. Hurthouse explicates that the decision of abortion should not be judged solely based on the status of the fetus, women’s right, or the sanctity of life. Rather it should be judged to be virtuous or not based on the circumstance and the attitude of the decision maker.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ethics on Abortion

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The first argument on the ethics of abortion is that abortion is a personal choice. This idea on abortion intends to imply that a fetus is not a human life. The life of the new embryo is not forced to be carried out because of the rights women possess. If new life is growing in a woman, then it should be her decision as it is regarding her own bodily autonomy. Abortion should be in the best concern of the woman pregnant because it does not go out and affect those around her. Also if the women in situations where abortion is an option needed, then who is more correct to go and force them to carry out a pregnancy. The idea that people have some ethical claim to personal, bodily autonomy must be regarded as fundamental to the conception of any ethical, democratic, and free society. Given that autonomy exists as an ethical necessity, the question becomes how far that autonomy extends. The fact that a woman is going to proceed with an abortion does not affect the larger public so it should not be unethical for this action to take place because others think that it is wrong. Many people stand with the idea that abortion is ethically a personal choice because the situations can always be brought to the point where a…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays