Judith Thomson A Defense Of Abortion Summary

As the title makes plain, Thomson asserts that abortion is not impermissible. More exactly, she argues for the conclusion that at times, abortion is permissible; she asserts that there are scenarios in which getting an abortion would be immoral. What is especially innovative is the way in which her argument is constructed by Thomson. She starts the essay by pointing out the argument over abortion seems to numerous individuals to hinge on whether the fetus is a man. Most feel that if we could simply discover the response to that puzzle, the consequences for abortion would be clear; namely, that if fetuses are not individuals then, and that if fetuses are persons afterward abortions should be impermissible abortions must be allowable (Thomson, 1984).
Thomson, though, concludes that reasoning in this way is misguided, or at very best is not complete. In light of this, she begins by conceding the problem of personhood to her opponent; she supposes, for purposes of argumentation, that the fetus is a man from the instant of conception. She tries to demonstrate that if this concession is made, abortion is permissible in several cases
It wouldn't stop women from having them if we outlaw abortion. In “A Defense of Abortion” Judith Thomson pokes holes in the extreme conservative argument, she's a moderate liberal. Although she is in the defense of abortion she states there continue to be times when it is impermissible. Her first analogy she compares a growing fetus to a renowned violinist who has unknowingly been attached to an individual’s circulatory system. Is the man responsible to stayed attached to the violinist? Thomson says no, because the person was abducted and they didn’t offer for the violinist to be attached. Thomson states “it’d be quite nice of you for doing a great kindness”. I am in agree with Thompson here no one ought to be compelled to really have a stranger plugged into them naively for period of nine