Preview

Second Punic War Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
530 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Second Punic War Analysis
Physical Environment A major component of the physical environment in the Second Punic War is the treaty between Carthage and Rome. The treaty outlined the borders between Carthage and Spain, the division between Rome and Carthage. After the First Punic War, Carthage began trying to expand those borders, one of the main reasons the Second Punic War began. Hannibal and the Carthaginian army frequently catch the Romans off guard with his bold actions of rucking through treacherous terrain and weather. For instance, the most dangerous movement the Carthaginian army made was the crossing of the Alps. The crossing of the Alps came at a cost, and Hannibal lost thousands of his men, elephants, and cavalry (Cartwright, 2016). Throughout the war, Hannibal …show more content…
Each side, at times, had to act with haste to destabilize the component. Hannibal and his army crossed the Alps as fast as they could to invade Italy and surprise the Romans. On the other hand, time was a valuable component in building a plan and being able to execute it effectively. Romans utilized the “Fabius Tactic” and took their time to battle Carthage. The Romans savored their supplies and soldiers using this tactic, while the Carthaginians were wasting away. The Romans took this time to strengthen their force and prepare for the final moments of the war. Scipio had to act at the right moment in hopes of being victorious. He journeyed to North Africa in three days and won victory after victory. He continued analyzing his situations and environments and acting at the most vulnerable times for the Carthaginians. Through time and strategic maneuver, the Romans were victorious in the Second Punic War.
Conclusion
The Second Punic War represents some of the most strategic maneuverings by military leaders and has set an example for the military today. By utilizing operational variables, our military has been able to analyze the Second Punic War and use successes and failures of Rome and Carthage to our advantage. Understanding the politics, the military, the economy, the social structure, infrastructure, use of information, physical environment and use of time, allows the military to shape their operational environments and determine

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    By 246 BCE, the Carthaginians controlled the trade routes and maritime trade in the Mediterranean. The Rome Republic was founded in 509 BCE as a result of an overthrow of Tarquinius Superbus, King of Rome. By 246 BCE, Rome, a small city, was unable to trade in the Mediterranean, only the Tiber River, but it dominated the Italian Peninsula, and only had access to the Italian Peninsula. However, Rome was growing stronger. The Punic Wars were fought to determine who controlled the trade in the…

    • 4407 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hannibal was born in 247 B.C. and from an earlier age, he was taught by his father, who was also a Carthaginian general, to hate the Romans. Hannibal, at the age of 26, attacked Sagunto Spain with the army he was given. This was the invasion that started the second Punic War. Hannibal took an army of over 100,00 men with him and 37 elephants with him over the Pyrenees and Alps. This long journey covered over 1,000 miles. Hannibal…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While the Carthaginian government make some valid points in their explanation of the blame for the Second Punic War Hannibal. Both they and Hannibal can be seen to share the responsibility for Carthage’s defeat in the Second Punic War. Hannibal’s quixotic plot to attack Rome without a veritable intention to destroy her left Carthage stranded in a war that would ultimately turn against her. However, the circumstances and misfortunes faced in a war on foreign soil against the might of Rome can at times be seen as beyond Hannibal’s control.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Battle tactics are said to have changed over time. However, just the opposite is evident. Battle tactics are for anyone to use, but work best with military’s that are stable and continually training. In many cases, militaries throughout the world can be seen using the same tactics today as used in the 2nd Punic War particularly The Battle of Cannae. What make tactics improve so well is the repetition of both practicing in training and executing tactics on the battlefield. Battle tactics improved with the establishment of a professional military because, most soldiers who were now veterans could move up in ranks and understand how they were previously defeated in different battles.…

    • 1788 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    He defeated the Carthaginians led by the legendary general, Hannibal at the northern city of Zama in Africa. By doing so, he ended the nearly 20 year old war. In this battle, the Romans were numerically deficient in infantry but where outnumbered in cavalry. After an extended skirmish between Rome and the Carthaginians, the light infantry and the mix of light infantry and war elephants deployed by Hannibal, and cause the man formations of the 2 sides to meet. Hannibal sends his army in echelon formation to envelop the roman flanks but ends up loosing the battle. The Battle of Zama was the last and decisive victory to the second Punic war. Zama was one of the three wars between Carthage and Rome and resulted in the destruction of Carthage and is annexed by Rome. A modern but similar battle to Zama was the Battle of Waterloo. Napoleon, another legendary general, led the French to battle against the English and their allies. Although Napoleon had a great reputation, Wellington, the general of the European side, proved to have more intelligence when he outsmarts Napoleon's plan and defeats the French. Both battles saw the final defeat of a famed and "invincible" military leader, Hannibal at Zama and Napoleon at Waterloo. Also, both battles were decisive battles in that they ultimately end the great wars. The Battle of Zama ended the 2nd Punic war and the Battle of Waterloo ended the Napoleonic wars. All in…

    • 1564 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He is most remembered for marching an army of thousands which included war elephants, from Iberia over the Pyrenees and the Alps into the northern part of Italy. During the first years of his fifteen year occupation of Italy, Hannibal and his armies were able to take Trebia, Trasimene and Cannae. In addition he was able to build alliances with some Romans. However, Scipio of North Africa had spent time analyzing and studying Hannibal’s tactics, he added some of his own and launched a counter invasion from the Northern part of Africa. Scipio sent Hannibal and his troops back to Carthage where he and his troops were defeated at the Battle of…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rome rule its people in a very organize and civil manner, which draws loyalty among its citizens. Rome has an effective and distinct way in managing people, particularly to the inhabitants of their newly acquired lands and territories. One of the best example was the Latins in Latium, whose devotion and loyalty were exceedingly commendable, especially during the Second Punic War, where they fought valiantly--along with the Romans --against the forces of Hannibal. On other hand, Carthage "great advantage" was they have a "permanent able leader," that command its military forces. Unlike Rome, the order of its military resides in the hands of its civil magistrates, who were constantly replaced…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even before the war started, Hannibal knew what he was going to do. Since Carthage had no navy, there was no hope of going directly from Carthage to Italy over the Mediterranean Sea. Hannibal thought up a dangerous but ingenious plan. In order to get to Italy over land, Hannibal and his army would have to travel from Carthage-controlled Spain across the Alps and into the heart of the enemy. Hannibal left in the cold winter of 218 B.C. with 50,000 infantry, 9,000 cavalry, and 37 war elephants. While crossing the Alps, "Hannibal's force suffered greatly from the elements and the hostility of the local tribesmen" (Beshara, 3). By the time they reached Italy, after only fourteen days, over 9,000 men had perished along with most of the elephants, but this number was soon replenished after 14,000 northern Gaul rebels joined Hannibal's army. This group of 60,000 men proved superior to the Roman forces, and after at least three recorded major victories, the Roman senate was exasperated. An army of 80,000 Roman soldiers was sent to stop…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As I have just spoken with Hannibal, he assures me that another conflict with Rome will end in their defeat and Carthage standing on top, victorious. We have already discussed strategy and there is virtually no way we can lose. We will strike where they are vulnerable. Their arrogance will be their downfall. Rome was determined to extend their reach as far north as the Alps and they have instigated conflict with the Gauls over this region. They feel that securing this area will create an impassible barrier to their north with their armies and navy securing the southern regions. They would never expect an assault from the north; especially one from us. Hannibal has been in contact with the Gauls and has their support. Our two regions are now allies. We have already proposed plans for an invasion with full support by the Gauls and the Gallic tribes.…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Tactics

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Gallic Wars showed the discipline, training, strategy and technological skill of the Roman army as demonstrated by the Siege of Alesia. “The soldiers took weeks or even months to build the kind of elaborate defenses and booby traps Caesar employed at Alesia; or to erect gigantic earthen ramps or long underground tunnels to gain access to the two or fortress they were besieging. In almost every Roman siege, therefore, dogged persistence and patience, along with sheer manpower, won the day.” (Nardo, p.72) The many obstacles and defenses that Caesar composed for the Alesians demonstrate the discipline, training, strategy and technological skill of the Roman army. The many weeks and months put into these elaborate technologies alone show their discipline, as well as the sheer amount of physical labor required to undergo such a large and difficult task such as erecting the gigantic earthen ramps or building underground tunnels. Additionally, the planning necessary to conduct campaigns with complex technologies, such as the ones employed by Caesar and his army,…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Hannibal Is To Blame

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rome sent us into battle with about 80,000 men. Hannibal on the other hand, arrived at the battlefield with about 40,000 infantry and 10,000 cavalry. Hannibal was very smart with how he planned out this battle. He managed to put us in a position where we were stuck, in a valley, with a river. We would not be able to escape, our mobility being restricted and especially because during the battle because Hannibal had his army lines facing north, while we faced the south and unfortunately in the valley, wind gusts blew our way resulting in dust and grit getting into many our men’s eyes.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the end, Hannibal was able to cut his losses and carry on with his march through Italy, but with great losses to his army; non expendable losses that would cost him the…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Second Punic Wars Analysis

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In this essay I will evaluate the applicability of systems theory as it pertains to the analysis of the second Punic Wars. The use of systems thinking provides a useful construct in the evaluation of the Second Punic campaigns. This is especially true as the reader assesses the human aspects of the conflict between Rome and Carthage in Italy, Africa, and Hispania in 218-202 BC. Systems theory or thinking, according to Peter Senge, is a discipline useful in understanding, and perhaps predicting complex events by utilizing analytical techniques that assess interrelationships, patterns and feedback related to events. System thinking is especially beneficial when assessing the dynamics associated with complex human interactions, such as, political…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Romans were highly skilled in battle. The weapons and tactics they used were no different from other armies but the main reason why they were so skilled was because they were very well disciplined. For example, a Roman soldier would never run from a battlefield. Also, before battle the Romans would line up their forces with the legion in the centre and cavalry and auxiliaries on either side. They did this so they could march forward until they were about twenty meters from their enemies, they then threw their javelins at them. Their plan was that before their oppositions had time to recover from being hit, they charged at them with their swords. With their swords and shields they would try and knock a hole in the enemy’s line-up and work their way outwards from there. Often archers or slingers were used to cause chaos in the enemy ranks before the soldiers would charge.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ancient Rome Vs Athens

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Sparta was the most feared city-state in all of Greece, and the Roman Empire was a global superpower. One of Sparta’s values is that a warrior never backs down in battle. For example, during the Persian War, when Sparta and Athens were allied, Persia went for Sparta first. The Spartans lost, however, they didn’t go without an extremely intense fight. With three hundred Spartans, King Leonidas faced an entire Persian army in efforts to allow the other Greeks a chance to recover. Every single soldier sacrificed his life in an effort to save Greece. Herodotus, a Greek historian, recalls the battle of Thermopylae; “Here they defended themselves to the last, such as still had swords using them, and the others resisting with their hands and teeth,” It was a loss in battle, but it was a win for the Greeks. The Roman Empire was similar to this determination in an example concerning the Gallic War. The Germanics thought they had the upper hand due to the fact that there was a river separating Gaul from Rome, however, that never stopped the Romans. Julius Caesar, Ancient Rome’s most famous dictator, ordered for his soldiers to construct a wooden bridge to cross the Rhine River. In a mere few days, Caesar’s army would cross the river, demonstrating that the Roman Empire could go anywhere. Therefore,…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays