Preview

Pros And Cons Of Mandatory Detention System

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
498 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of Mandatory Detention System
Mandatory detention brings no benefit for the Government or anyone else involved, in fact it has quite the opposite effect. There is a long list of drawbacks for the detention system, and one important example is that statistically, if eighty-eight per cent of asylum seekers are found to be genuine refugees, then they are in most cases entitled to a life in Australia under our protection. The urgency for vigorous border protection drops if such a high number is being resettled, as there will obviously be a lower percentage of people who are trying to enter the country for other reasons than to claim refugee status. If there is less urgency for border protection, the cost factor involved would not be so ridiculously large, and the unnecessary use of the aforementioned amounts of money in the whole scheme …show more content…

Boats are being stopped in the physical sense, but they are not deterring them. This is because when a person or group of people are being persecuted or fear persecution, they will do anything to save themselves. It is an instinct that almost every human has, to flee in the face of danger. The idea of mandatory detention cannot therefore deter people when in danger because at that point, they do not think about where they will end up, rather how they can escape. Although the act of turning the boats back, the ‘stop the boats’ policy, has gained support from a portion of Australians with a certain mind-set, the government have been receiving a lot of disrespect for their actions internationally. Organisations such as the UNHCR, the International Human Rights Commission, the Commonwealth Ombudsman and Amnesty International have all reported that inspections of detention centres do not meet the minimum standards for the housing of asylum seekers, and that Australia is breaching international law by not upholding it’s

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Australia have certainly failed to balance their law under the international law and are essentially required to revise their practices of both human rights standards and to ensure that they do not cause further harm to people, fleeing of desperate…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Abst100 Nter

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Northern Territory Emergency Response (NTER) was a legislation established by John Howard in 2007, with support of the Labor Party put in place to blanket 73 Aboriginal communities, in total 20,000 recipients in Northern Territory with restrictive policies that would control and dictate the present and future lives of the Indigenous inhabitants of Australia in the name of “protecting Indigenous children from sexual abuse in remote indigenous communities” (Thalia Anthony), however multiple policies have been scrutinized for their necessity of implementation in the name of protecting Indigenous children, in companionship is that no cases of sexual abuse consequential of “Rings of Pedophiles” as Howard put it (Tom Calma 2013), have been found or resolved under this controversial legislation that also breached Racial Discrimination Act 1975 consequential of its policies which have “also been criticized from a legal perspective and described as “unilaterally responding to child sexual assault in the NT in a manner that defies international human rights law, the rule of law and national and international research with respect to Indigenous children’s “Wellbeing””” (Libesman, 2007b, p 24). The NTER is current to this day with some policies spreading throughout Australia, blanketing the freedom of Indigenous people not just in the NT where the children are being affected by sexual abuse, but Queensland, and now frighteningly New South Wales, which delivers no further protection for NT Indigenous children from sexual abuse. Interestingly the Social Security Amendment Act, quarantining of payment is a system implemented by the government which controls up to 100% of an Indigenous person’s payment to which can only be spent at specific stores for groceries, some clothing, and paying rent (Thalia Anthony). This is dictation of what Indigenous people do, or rather don’t have as freedom, and entitlement to their human rights. “What the government had implemented had…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rough Draft Fifty-five years without possibility of parole. That is what Weldon Angelos is facing for selling a total of $350 worth of marijuana, and carrying a firearm; even though, he has no criminal history and never fired the gun. This is all due to laws called mandatory minimum sentences (MMS); which are sentences that are determined by the weight of the drugs or the presence of a firearm during a felony offense. They are called mandatory because judges are forced to impose these sentences based solely on the amount of drug present without any leniency. The mandatory minimum prison sentences are a controversial way to fight the “War on Drugs” that have a conflicted history and have drastically increased prison populations and costs.…

    • 1639 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Keeping in mind the brief overview of each of the major rationales for sentencing will allow the following four arguments to be understood with greater clarity. To begin, the first argument to support the urgent need to restructure the criminal justice system is the effect and impact of mandatory minimum sentencing on the high rates of incarcerations. The effects of mandatory minimum sentencing are staggering, and transcend into many different areas of the criminal justice system. The principal justification for the creation of mandatory minimum sentences is that by increasing the likelihood of custody, it will be a strict deterrent for crime prevention and a response to political “tough on crime” strategies. It was also thought to minimize…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    If I could change one thing about Australia, I would change the poor treatment of the Asylum Seekers from war-infested countries. In fact, Australia is the only country in the world to mandate the detention of Asylum Seekers. This Anti-Asylum policy has been at the spotlight of international criticism by various humanitarian organisations, calling the actions of the Australian Government "an act of discrimination and racism".…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mandatory arrest for domestic violence calls is to ensure the safety of the victim from the alleged offender. I think this policy impacts the community significantly depending on the situation and the severity of the allegations. The pros of arrest for domestic violence calls ensure safety for the victim, family members and the community. The cons wit this issue is often times there are false allegations made and lack of sufficient evidence but because of policy a person must be placed under arrest. This can negatively impact a person’s life in many ways. They can lose their jobs and not get jobs because of their offenses. I would be against this policy because there isn’t always sufficient evidence leading one person to being the main aggressor…

    • 147 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mandatory minimums are laws which require automatic prison terms for certain crimes, such as drug possession. These laws were passed to ensure that individual criminals served long prison sentences. However, there some critics that have voiced their concerns about mandatory minimum penalties in the United States.…

    • 224 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    And numerous reports have shown that many asylum seekers are unaware of Australia’s domestic asylum policies, so the use of punishing policies has zero limiting effect. A clear example of the failure of punitive policies to prevent asylum seekers is the policy of Temporary Protection Visas (TPVs). The number of asylum seekers arriving by boat to Australia continued to increase after the introduction of temporary protection visas in 1999 (48% more asylum seekers arrived by boat in 2001 than in 1999). Asylum seekers arriving by boat only started decreasing in 2003 when global asylum numbers started dropping. This evidence strongly suggests that temporary protection visas have no value as a restriction to number of asylum seekers arriving by boat. The same rationale holds true for mandatory detention, introduced in…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    population. This gives the city of Cranston more tax and voting power and it gives the politicians in that area more money (Monteiro).…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Australia and seeks asylum, we lock them up. We lock them up indefinitely and in…

    • 582 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every situation in life is unique and has its own set of circumstances. Crime is no different, which is why it often difficult to effectively use policies like mandatory minimum sentences, because not every crime is the same. It is acceptable for their to be some disparity in sentencing for similar crimes, but there still needs to be some consistency. The initiation of mandatory minimum sentences was due in large part to the fact that judges had too much discretion and it led to many similar cases having wildly different sentences.1 There was sound reasoning for enacting mandatory minimum sentences, but they “are the product of good intentions, but good intentions do not always make good policy; good results are also necessary.”1 Mandatory…

    • 1908 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In society today, it is commonly known that crime rate has increased dramatically by the years. This is where many of us look for ways to solve such issue. It is the last place anybody would want to be in. but unfortunately we have hundreds of thousands of them, if not millions around the world. Thousands in just the United States, Those are prisons. Just hearing that word makes us think bad things right away. Murder, theft, violence, and everything bad that happens in this world. We live in a world where prisons and jail are very important and almost every country, state, county, or city must have at least one. Prisons now are much more crowded than they were 20 years ago. The number of inmates in just the United States has doubled between the years of 1992 and 2011. The question many of us should ask ourselves is why do we need prisons? Are prisons effective in any way? Are prisons causing economic issues? Are prisoners getting proper treatment while incarcerated?…

    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    They have done absolutely nothing wrong, yet are subjected to something that is classified as abuse-being locked up in barbed wire and not allowed to just live a normal life. Mandatory detention for children has some long term effects too, and they could be serious. The children in detention centres are especially vulnerable to mental diseases such as depression or bi-polar disease. These children could be led to think that they are worthless or not good enough. Furthermore, when these children do get released from detention, they could get teased or bullied about their ordeal, leading to mental…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Since 2002, the United States has had the highest incarceration rate in the world. Although prison populations are increasing in some parts of the world, the natural rate of incarceration for countries comparable to the United States tends to stay around 100 prisoners per 100,000 population. The U.S. rate is 500 prisoners per 100,000 residents, or about 1.6 million prisoners in 2010, according to the latest available data from the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS). Prison is a place used for internment of convicted criminals. Not including the death penalty, a sentence to prison is the harshest punishment inflicted on criminals in the United States. On the federal level, imprisonment or incarceration is managed by the Federal Bureau of Prisons, a federal…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The topic we chose was an important time in history dealing with prisons. We chose MASS INCARCERATION and focused on the legacy of Ronald Reagan and the escalating war on drugs. Today we are going to talk to you about the policies surrounding the war on drugs and how they have affected mass incarceration and policies that devalue the meaning of the 4th amendment.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays