Preview

Pros And Cons Of Beccaria

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
233 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of Beccaria
1. Beccaria’s argument pertaining to crime comprised of a number of ideas. Due to criminal laws placing restrictions on individual freedoms, he believed they should be restricted in scope (Smith, 2016, p. 35). He also argued that the guiding principle in the administration of justice should be the presumption of innocence (Smith, 2016, p. 35). Beccaria also believed the complete criminal law code should be written and should define all offenses and punishments in advance, also that punishment should be based on retributive reasoning. Another component of his argument included the severity of the punishment should be limited and should not go beyond what is necessary for crime prevention and deterrence (Cullen, Agnew, & Wilcox, 2014, p. 37).

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Cesare Beccaria Theory

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In addition, the boys fail to effectively govern themselves based on Cesare Beccaria’s idea that a successful government must have an equal and fair justice system. Beccaria was a famous philosopher who lived through the 18th century and believed that it is vital for governments to establish a fair justice system in order to enforce the laws (“Cesare Beccaria”). He deduced that bad law enforcement promotes immorality in society and many innocent people may face punishments that they don’t deserve (“Cesare Beccaria”). Furthermore, Beccaria suggested that a reformed justice system would also match the level of punishment to the severity of the crime in order to maintain a balance (“Cesare Beccaria”). This theory states that an effective government requires an equitable and equal justice system, because without this component, anarchy is bound to overcome…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many principles of Classical Criminology can be seen in many forms of sentencing legislation and crime prevention methods used in contemporary society today. The Crimes Act ( Vic) 1958 is a prime example of legislation, which sets out an array of crimes and their prescribed punishments. One of the main points of the Classical School can be seen in this act, ‘the seriousness of the crime should be determined by the harm caused to society; crimes and punishments needed to be defined by legislature’. Section 18B of the Sentencing Act (vic) 1999 provides that the court may impose harsher sentences to offenders deemed a threat to the community. Another example in accordance to the principle that punishment should be proportionate to the crime and…

    • 160 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tanning is something that almost every teenager, woman and occasionally some men do. There are a couple of different ways to tan; one way to tan is to use the tanning bed, which is the most well-liked way of tanning because it is quicker. The second way to tan is by natural sunlight. Either way the person chooses they are positive and negative points about both. No matter which way a person chooses to tan, there good points and bad points to consider in relation to appearance, health and cost.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Keeping in mind the brief overview of each of the major rationales for sentencing will allow the following four arguments to be understood with greater clarity. To begin, the first argument to support the urgent need to restructure the criminal justice system is the effect and impact of mandatory minimum sentencing on the high rates of incarcerations. The effects of mandatory minimum sentencing are staggering, and transcend into many different areas of the criminal justice system. The principal justification for the creation of mandatory minimum sentences is that by increasing the likelihood of custody, it will be a strict deterrent for crime prevention and a response to political “tough on crime” strategies. It was also thought to minimize…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    From this point onward, Cesare had no longer yielded the touch of brilliance, as a result, the book “On Crimes and Punishments” became his only work to receive wide fame and recognition. To further elaborate on his writings, during the early 1760’s, Cesare Beccaria had become aware of using his writings as a method to voice his opinions to the general public, showcasing his opinion about the criminal justice system and the economy. For instance, within Cesare Beccaria’s magnum opus “On Crimes and Punishments,” many view the work as a method that Cesare used to critique the flaws in the criminal justice system and to resolve the problem with his take on the situation. To begin with, we first must analyze the books ongoing theme, as it contains and is influenced by Cesare’s opinion about the criminal justice system. Throughout the book, we the readers are a treated with Cesare’s two main themes or theories: First, the “Social Contract,” or in other words, a punishment is justified only to defend the social contract and to ensure that everyone will abide…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The classical school theory was common in the late eighteenth century and into the early nineteenth century. The classical school theory thought crime was caused by individuals who were rational. This theory believed that crime wears away the bond between humans and society, and is why crime is an immoral behavior (Schmalleger, 2009). Punishment under this theory was more severe therefore Cesare Beccaria came up with a less harmful yet effective way to punish those who commit crimes.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Three Strikes Rule

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The relation of violent crimes and the idea of recidivism has always been something that has been taken into account in the legal system. As early as 1895 in the Gladstone Committee Report, habitual offenders have garnered attention in penology circles (Katkin 99). The idea of punishing recidivism is split among politicians, though, as many politicians who disagree argue that the result is too monetarily costly for the state and the state’s citizens. One of the proposed solutions to this problem is what is called the “Three Strikes Rule”. Because this is a reserved power of the states, no decision made is federal, thus there are many heated debates over…

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The punitive model has beneficial aspects such as the severity of crime and having a strict layout of punishment, but there are a few ethical issues within this model. This model has increased incarceration rates, which has creating a safer society, nonetheless, in return it is causing issues with overcrowding and lack of funding’s. This part of the new model would incorporate the strict punishments ideas, but to an extent. This type of punishment would be directed towards individuals who were guilty of serious crimes such as domestic violence, rape, other forms of sexual offenses, murder (all degrees), attempted murder, and kidnapping. These types of crimes are much more severe and require punitive punishment due to the fact that these individuals have a slim chance of being released into society and the rehabilitation program will not benefit society.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The general public did not feel safe in their communities. This prompted a get tough on crime approach that was based on the crime control model. This system was designed to incarcerate offenders for extended periods of time. Public sentiment drives the legislative process in regard to the laws that are enacted to control crime. There is also the belief that the politicians are solely responsible for the laws. The writer believes that the will of the citizens ultimately drives the legislation. There is evidentiary support provided to support this. The enactment of three criteria regarding sentencing is an example of the citizens not feeling safe in their communities and the politicians reacting by passing laws that represent their sentiment. The sentencing called for enhanced punishments for repeat or habitual offenders, determinate sentencing, and safeguards that provided fair and equitable punishments regardless of the racial and ethnic make-up of the accused. There was legislation enacted that ensured that sentencing adhered to a standard that is non-discriminatory in nature and delivered just deserts to the offenders. There were two legislative mandates that were enacted to provide oversight and regulate sentencing. The Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984 and the Sentencing Reform Act are interrelated in that one regulates the other. The Crime Control law focuses on…

    • 1947 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    It ignores the possibility of unremorseful offenders and unwilling victims, challenges the criminal justice system operation, undermines the law- that define crimes and send offenders to prison, as well as outline the rights that protect citizens from the government. Crime can ruin lives, destroy relationships, and a mediated conversation can’t heal every wound, or address the problem at large. It reduces the legitimacy of law, which citizens are required to abide by, and believe in. The lack of established process results in discrepancies in outcomes; refuting the idea of equality before the law. Objectivity is essential to due process, and working with the victim eliminates the possibility of legitimate and fair consequences. This includes both extremes, harsh punishment for a minor crime and or no punishment for a harsher crime. The decision rests in the hands of a common citizen, who is usually virtually uneducated of the process of law as compared to appointed justices. Justices are appointed to fairly evaluate the situation and proceed in accordance with the law, and restorative justice can give too much power in the hands of those in the…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Historical theories of punishment were based on the concept that applying fearful consequences to criminals would discourage any potential offenders. During the late 1700’s, a criminologist by the name of Cesar Beccaria argued the fact that the death penalty served no purpose as a form of punishment, let alone as a deterrence to criminals. He advocated to reform the criminal justice system through penology, concerning specifically with punishment and deterrence (Beccaria, 2009). In the following essay, Beccaria’s theory of punishment will be thoroughly…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philosophy Of Sentencing

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This paper is written in an attempt to comprehend the sentencing philosophy and purpose of criminal punishment through a review of the historical parameters concerning how sentencing and punishment serve society. Sentencing is the application of justice and the end result of a criminal conviction which is applied by the convening authority; followed by the sentence, or judgement of the court on a convicted offender. What makes punishment unique to our society is the application of our moral or ethical beliefs as a whole, and by the population at large. Throughout history, the sentencing and administration of punishments have been swift, brutal and often times ending with the death of the offender, but in our more civilized and modern society,…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Classical Era Punishment

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Cesare Beccaria was the author of On Crimes and Punishments. His essay was about condemning torture and the capital punishment and reformation. His essay would later be used as a guide for constructing the Bill of Rights and the U.S Constitution. He had a social contract view of society in which everyone agreed that the Lawmaker was the sovereign power who alone represented the will of all the people. He believed an effective punishment should be swift, certain, impartial, universal, and proportionate to the crime. Deterrence depends upon learning on associating cause and effect. The sooner the punishment follows on the crime, the stronger the association in the mind of the criminal. When judges stray from the punishment set…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Probation and Parole

    • 1867 Words
    • 8 Pages

    1. What did Cesare Beccaria, the Enlightenment thinker, mean when he said that a punishment should fit the crime?…

    • 1867 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mandatory minimum sentences plant a generalization on crime that fails to account for the context in which the crime is committed. If there are not interpretation and adjudical of a crime in its entirety, mandatory minimum sentences have imposed harsher punishment to individuals who do not deserve it. Nevertheless, mandatory minimum sentences ultimately go on to satisfy Beccaria’s views on punishment because it allows the punishment to be certain and…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays