Preview

Philosophy Of Sentencing

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
851 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Philosophy Of Sentencing
This paper is written in an attempt to comprehend the sentencing philosophy and purpose of criminal punishment through a review of the historical parameters concerning how sentencing and punishment serve society. Sentencing is the application of justice and the end result of a criminal conviction which is applied by the convening authority; followed by the sentence, or judgement of the court on a convicted offender. What makes punishment unique to our society is the application of our moral or ethical beliefs as a whole, and by the population at large. Throughout history, the sentencing and administration of punishments have been swift, brutal and often times ending with the death of the offender, but in our more civilized and modern society, …show more content…
The complexities of human nature, emotions, thought, morals and ethics have been debated for centuries, and the dilemma of sentencing another human to a form of corporal punishment, incarceration or death, requires a firm foundation in the laws of the land, tempered by years of study and dedication to the law one has sworn to uphold. The several reasons for sentencing of a crime is: Revenge, for an actual or perceived need for vengeance on a violation, usually one that is very personal and emotional in nature. Incapacitation, which is to prevent the criminal from repeating crimes against society by placing them into a correctional facility on a long term or permanent basis. Restoration, is a form of sentencing when the convening authority is attempting to protect the victims by helping them to feel safe and secure. Deterrence is a sentence where the courts attempt to prevent the subject of a crime from offending again. Retribution, which is probably the oldest reason for sentencing was utilized for equal punishment to the crime, drawing from the old adage “eye for an eye”. Lastly is the sentence of rehabilitation, which in societies modern view, the ideal and preferred sentence, …show more content…
Remorse for the offense and apology to the victims, court and society are greatly scrutinized and regarded in the sentencing stage of a trial, however, they are not to be used as a replacement for punishment, but may be regarded for leniency. Remorse and apologies have been ingrained into our psyche beginning in childhood, where a simple “I am sorry”, is a request for forgiveness and can mend many broken fences. For the victims involved, an apology can be the start of the healing process and closure for crimes of an intense emotional nature (Bibas & Bierschbach, 2004). Fortunately our society is not limited to just incarceration or death, but there are several options available to the court system. The sentencing authority can implement a monetary fine, community service, house arrest or even probation or time served (Schmalleger & Smykla,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    From the beginning of time, society has not always accepted that the punishment fits the crime. There is always uncertainty and bitterness with the belief that the punishment has been too harsh or too lenient.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    10. Pratt, John (1994), 'Understanding Punishment: Beyond Aims and Objectives ', The Criminology Journal, vol.5, 2-8. Retrieved from Expanded Academic Asap database.…

    • 1936 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Harsh Prison Sentences

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Harsh prison sentences will prevent people from committing crime. Punishment is defined as the infliction or imposition of a penalty as retribution for an offense (Oxford Dictionary). In this essay, an attempt will be made to discuss whether harsh prison sentences will prevent people from committing crime. Firstly, in countries like Indonesia different crimes are punished with the death sentence which causes problems in families of those that are executed. Secondly, prison conditions have been proven to not prevent crime but instead cause even more crime. Thirdly, punishments bring negative reinforcements; the harsher the punishment the heavier the imprint in the prisoner’s mind and the more prone this person will be to committing crime once released. Finally, a conclusion will be presented.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Just Desserts

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages

    References: Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2011). Recidivism rates of prisoners. Retrieved from http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/index.cfm?ty=datool&surl=/recidivism/index.cfm# Frase, R. S. (1997). Sentencing principles in theory and practice. Crime and Justice. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1147577…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Punishment is our current most exercised consequence for bringing justice to those victims of criminals by incarcerating offenders in a jail or prison, as well as other forms such as the community service, probation, and even the death penalty. While jail and/or prison life is necessary to protect the public by confining criminals away from public harm, I believe that “only” punishing dangerous criminals is simply not enough.…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Death Penalty

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Death Penalty Capital Punishment is a very controversial issue that is sweeping the nation. While some feel that the death penalty serves as a rightful and just punishment to the crime that was committed, others feel that we as humans have the right to decide whether they die for the crimes they commit. The question at hand is does the death penalty serve a deterrent to crime? The death penalty does not serve as a deterrent to crime. “Capital punishment has always attracted controversy. Simply, the arguments for and against can be divided into four categories with a moral and a pragmatic argument on each side. The purpose of the death penalty is central to the debate. Punishment can be seen as serving three purposes: retribution, deterrence and reformation. The death penalty can have no reformative purpose in terms of re-establishing 'a good citizen '. Therefore, the case for it must rely on retribution and deterrence. The pragmatic justification for the death penalty sees it as a unique and effective deterrent, which therefore protects society” (Von Drehle, 2008, p. 38).…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    AJS/502 Punishment and Rehabilitation Society expects the criminal justice system to punish and rehabilitate persons who commit crime. In the United States, the primary goal to be achieved for those who break the law is punishment. There are many arguments amongst theorists on the approach that works best. Some think punishment is the best approach to crime, others think rehabilitation works best. The effectiveness of punishment and rehabilitation is being analyzed continuously from a perspective that notes the effects on both victims and offenders. The financial and social impacts on society are also being studied. The classical ideal about criminology proposes that punishment is used to create deterrence and the positive…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To maintain peace and respect among members of a society is to achieve justice. Justice is to ensure fairness, equity, and moral righteousness through law and order. That is, by imposing the idea that there are consequences for deviant behavior, actions that serve to threaten the norm and disrupt the peace of the public. In essence, the result of socially, individually, and criminally harmful behavior is to endure punishment. Though, of what purpose is being served if the punishment inflicted fails to independently acknowledge the offender as an individual, by personalizing the punishment. This implies that a reoffender who is familiar with the legal system has adapted and aware of the humane limitations of punishment. Whereas, a first time offender entering the system will be deterred and more anxious for release into society after serving a short, swift, and effective punishment (Bank 2004). Therefore, recognizing a distinction between the two offenders described, it would be most effective for our punishment system to be developed on the basis of the retributive theory which accounts the history…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Effective of Punishment V. Effective of Rehabilitation This paper will discuss the effectiveness of punishment v. the effectiveness of rehabilitation. I will highlight how each affects the deterrence of crime as well as their effect on society as a whole. The notion of punishment and rehabilitation is one that has sparked debate across America for centuries. The judicial system as well as society has their own expectations of both aspects and some are neither realistic nor similar.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Purpose of punishment.

    • 1364 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Introduction Within the English legal system there are four main theories of punishment; retribution, deterrence, incapacitation and rehabilitation. The retributive theory looks back to the crime and punishes because of the crime. The remaining three all look forward to the consequences of punishment and thereby hope to achieve a reduction in crime. They are therefore often termed consequentialist or utilitarian theories. The boundaries between these theories are far from clear, containing sub-categories, many of which are perceived quite differently by different writers. To establish why it is we punish, each theory will have to be examined closely.…

    • 1364 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Commnication

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages

    March 7, 2013 Abstract This paper will give detail of the different forms of punishment in the U.S. department of corrections system. It will discuss what the state and federal objectives are. It will also tell how sentencing affects the state and federal system overall. It will explain what determinate and indeterminate sentencing is and which one is most important from the writer’s aspect.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philosophy of Punishment

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Punishment In Plato’s The Republic, Socrates has many conversations with people in order to further understand concepts such as justice and the way things are ideally supposed to be done. When I think about justice the definition that comes to mind is: the administration of a just action because of an unjust or immoral act being done by a human or group of humans. The issue of proper punishment has also been discussed in those conversations with Socrates and his peers. There must be a punishment for immoral or unjust actions committed by any human otherwise everything in our world would turn into complete chaos.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal activities in the world are rapidly increasing. Each country has law of its own which works towards minimizing the criminal actions by sentencing the offender. There are different means and ways of sentencing a criminal. One of it is Victim Offender Reconciliation- a new approach to justice and the other is Alternative Sentencing- shaming sentencing.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Punishment Research Paper

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Punishment Research Paper Punishment comes in different forms. Today’s criminal system has four justifications for punishment; these justifications for punishment are Retribution, Deterrence, Rehabilitation, and Social Protection. Rehabilitation is the oldest justification for punishment. Punishment is society’s revenge for a moral wrong. In principle, punishment should be equal in severity to the crime itself. Deterrence is an early modern approach. Crime is considered social disruption, which society acts to control. People are viewed as rational and self-interested; deterrence works because the pain of punishment outweighs the pleasure of crime. Rehabilitation a modern strategy linked to the development of social sciences. Crime and other deviance are viewed as the result of social problems (such as poverty) or personal problems (such as mental illness). Social conditions are improved; treatment is tailored to the offender’s condition. Social Protection is a modern approach easier to carry out than rehabilitation. Even if society is unable or unwilling to rehabilitate offenders or reform social conditions, people are protected by the imprisonment or execution of the offender. The state imposes legal punishment to criminals in different forms and severity with different purpose. It can be a temporary form of punishment such as imprisonment or imposing sorts of fine. It can be a lifelong punishment, such as life imprisonment. At the worst, punishment can be up to the extent of permanently removing the criminal from the society by execution. Though believed to reduce crime in society, punishment is generally seen as quite coercive and burdensome. Whether it is really doing more good than harm to the concerned individuals remain a topic of discussion and criticism.…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sentencing and punishment essay in achieving justice The main purpose of the criminal justice system is to prevent crimes and to protect citizens from the wrong doings of others and to keep society in a stable and working order. Throughout Australia, sentencing is the final unambiguous act given from the court to the offender as their result of punishment. The Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) is apparent to be one of the main core of statutory guidelines in relation to the sentencing procedure in NSW. The law itself explores the type of penalties, purposes of punishment, clarifies that prison is the last resort and discusses the limitations on penalties. The Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) characterises all the various factors which have to be considered during the act of sentencing, for example, mitigating and aggravating factors such as the evidence in which is presented by the circumstance of the crime and or the character of the offender, as well as the state of mind in which the offender was under. This essay will further highlight the effectiveness of sentencing and punishment to an extent as for the ineffectiveness of the issue as well.…

    • 583 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays