Preview

Plessey V. Simpson Case Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
722 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Plessey V. Simpson Case Analysis
In the sole dissent of the Plessey v. Ferguson case, Justice Harlan proclaimed that “[o]ur Constitution in color-blind and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens” (Linder, 2016). Yet trials in America have long included conversations about race, such as with the infamous O. J. Simpson trial. Legal distinctions based on race are also frequently made, such as is done when considering college admission. These conversations and distinctions are allowed because in reality, neither the Constitution nor the American justice system are truly color-blind. Nor should they be; a color-conscious Constitution and justice system allow America an attempt to make up for past sins, such as the ruling of Plessey v. Ferguson. The 1995 murder trial …show more content…
The prosecution claimed this was to reduce the commuting time of prosecutors; however, some argue that this was done to avoid protests that could have ignited over a conviction by mostly white jury in Santa Monica (Linder, 2000). Additionally, the prosecution put Mark Fuhrman on the stand, the Los Angeles detective with a history of racist remarks who handled some of the most damning evidence (Linder, 2000). Despite all the evidence against him, including his blood found at the murder scene, O. J. Simpson was acquitted (Linder, 2000). Public opinion over Simpson’s case was divided along racial lines: many black Americans believed the former football star had been framed by a racist police force, and saw Simpson’s acquittal as a victory for black America; many white Americans believed Simpson was guilty and the justice system had failed a victim of domestic violence in Nicole Simpson. Without question, the O.J. Simpson trial revealed that the race conversation was not over. The O.J. Simpson trial represented the frustration that black Americans felt towards the criminal justice system. When the black community celebrated O.J. Simpson’s acquittal, they were celebrating a victory against a system that persecuted black men …show more content…
This uneven playing field is evident in both America’s education system and criminal justice system. From United States v. Schooner Amistad, in which the freedom of abducted Africans was questioned, to Plessey v. Ferguson, in which the Court claimed that laws allowing segregation "do not necessarily imply the inferiority of either race to the other” (Linder, 2016), the American justice system has been forced to address color. Legal decisions such as Plessey v. Ferguson allowed for racial segregation until Brown v. Board of Education in 1954 (Linder,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    On June 7th, 1892 a light-skin African American named Homer Adolph Plessy was removed from a train In East Louisiana and detained by Detective Calhoun for being an African American train passenger on a train populated with Caucasians. According to the legality of the arrest, Plessy violated Louisiana’s Separate Car Act of 1890 which legalized segregation of public transportation in the state of Louisiana. The Plessy v. Ferguson case was eventually taken to the Supreme Court and in 1896 the groundbreaking decision was made from a 7-1 vote lead by Chief Justice Brown to legalize and constitutionalize segregation in the public/private sectors under the notion or doctrine of “Separate but Equal.” The Citizens Committee of Louisiana or Comite Des…

    • 148 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Oj Simpson Research Paper

    • 1753 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Stewart, J. B. (1995). Race, science, and "just-us": Understanding jurors ' reasonable doubt in the OJ simpson trial. The Black Scholar, 25(4), 43. Retrieved from http://0-search.proquest.com.liucat.lib.liu.edu/docview/229758638?accountid=12142Shipp, E. R. (1994). OJ and the black media. Columbia Journalism Review, 33(4), 39. Retrieved from…

    • 1753 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, the Scottsboro Boys’ case stimulated a great change in the way interracial cases are treated. It established that people may not be excluded from juries on the basis of race and that criminal defendants are entitled to effective assistance of counsel. The nine Scottsboro Boys, despite being accused by two white women, were able to break the racial boundary and prompt a permanent change on the way blacks are treated across…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Why Is Oj Simpson Guilty

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    was guilty was because of the evidence at the scene and on his belongings. 1.5ml of O.J. Simpson’s blood was missing from the lab, so the defense made it seem that the blood was stolen and then planted at the crime scene. “The prosecution of Simpson’s case presented compelling DNA evidence, including matching bloody footprints, hair follicles and a glove found near Simpson’s home containing blood that tested positive to the blood of Goldman”(101.5, 2012). Blood from the killings was also found on the handle of O.J. Simpson’s Ford Bronco, but the defense said it was planted on his car from the blood missing from the lab. A bloody footprint at the scene was also found that was identical to O.J.’s shoe print. The killer also left a glove at the scene of the crime but when O.J. tried the glove on, he made it seem like it didn’t fit and the defense also made the court believe that the glove was placed at the crime scene by a racist cop looking to help convict O.J. The evidence found and collected was plenty enough to convict O.J. but the defense flipped the whole trial from being about murder to racism. I do not believe the prosecutors did a well enough job to charge O.J. because of their lack of patience or because the blood from the crime scene was stolen and made it seem like the white cops were out to get him. Either way it goes, O.J. had a good lawyer or a good enough lawyer to beat the…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the root of all injustice, whether past or present, is an underlying human selfishness and flawed decision-making ability. For example, in the past, during the Scottsboro Trial of the 1930s, 9 innocent African American teenagers underwent a wrongful accusation and years of suffering in prison simply because of their race. This injustice highlights selfishness because the women who accused these boys of rape were thinking solely about the protection of themselves; not wanting to arrested for being prostitutes, but not thinking about how the false accusation could and would ruin and torture the boys’ lives. In addition, the jury showcased flaws of the human ability to make choices, as they let the social norm and racist bias of the time…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oj Simpson Trial

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages

    O.J. Simpson was convicted of murdering his wife, Nicole Brown Simpson. There are three crucial factors with the evidence against him. First, the L.A.P.D. has been proven corrupt and racially biased. Second, the evidence, including blood samples, and the glove from the scene of the crime. Third, the juries from during the trial were all mainly African American, so they began to have a race issue. Everyone has their own implication of how the verdict should continue if the evidence fits, he is guilty if the evidence does not fit he will be found not guilty!…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The New Jim Crow describes how institutionalized racism has taken hold in the American Justice system. In the first chapter, Michelle Alexander runs through the history of racial castes in the United States, from the beginnings of slavery, to Jim crow and eventually the “law and order” rhetoric that developed into the system in place today. The book moves on to point out the server flaws in the justice system. These flaws, according to Alexander, are found within each step of the journey to jail or probation. Areas where racist acts can slip in virtually undetected, whether it be in the arrest, the accusation, or sentencing.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Institutional Discrimination, the reason why Trayvon Martin, an African-American teenager who was unarmed was shot and killed by former neighborhood watch captain, George Zimmerman. How can the color of one's skin determine life or death? Or how can one’s class make someone assume they are dangerous to society? Justice needs to be served and equality should be given to all, the various ways of discrimination being practiced in the legal system institution has to end now.…

    • 76 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On March 3, 1991, a high speed chase happened on the 210 freeway. The officers, Laurence Powell, Timothy Wind, Theodore Briseno, and Stacey Koon, stopped King and proceeded to beat him unmercifully, claiming he refused to obey and get into a position to be taken into custody. George Holliday, the cameraman, recorded it all. When the video was released to social media, the four police officers was charged with “assault with a deadly weapon and excessive use of force”. A trial was held in Simi Valley in L.A. The trial lasted for three months. The jury found the officers innocent. The jury consisted of ten white people, one Hispanic, and one Asian. Thus, the match of violence was struck. There was not one African American chosen. Sounds familiar does it not? The “racism card” was thrown into…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Sacco-Vanzetti Trial

    • 2254 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In examining the events of the Sacco and Vanzetti trial, we found not only the undertones of the social issues of the 1920's, but also a major flaw in our American judicial process. We have not hoped to prove the guilt or innocence of Sacco and Vanzetti, but rather to show that these men did not receive a trial based on impartiality and criminal facts alone. It was a trial, instead, of bias, political beliefs, and circumstantial evidence elevated only by playing on the inherent social prejudices of a jury of white American men. The controversy surrounding their innocence will undoubtedly continue throughout the centuries, but the near indisputable fact remains that Sacco and Vanzetti did not receive a fair trial and that racial prejudices can permeate our societal structures to an unfortunate end. The ease with which it entered this infamous trial is reason enough to examine our current system and be aware of its weaknesses. The Sacco-Vanzetti case is proof that justice is often not blind, but instead is a very seeing participant in our systems and our…

    • 2254 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    He wanted to demonstrate that Brown not only raised new obstacles to segregation in legal civil social contexts but also challenged the assumption that there was no option but loyalty to the status quo. He then goes on to discuss the important work of lawyers who started the legal fight for racial integration decades before the Brown decision, the obstacles they faced and overcame, and the disappointment they eventually experienced, as they saw a critical decision weakened not only by the legislative and executive branches of the government but by the same Court, as its membership to conservatives who turned their backs on the mandate articulated in Brown. Finally he brings into this book his personal reflections on Brown during his lifetime. Ogletree recounts his story through the various stages of maturity and self discoveries he underwent and takes the reader on that journey. He begins with his childhood encounters with race, his experiences in college and law schools as a beneficiary of Brown and affirmative action programs, and the impact that the end of legal segregation had in his life. He comes to the conclusion that "To be blind to race is to be blind to reality," and that this country will always be divided into two nations separated by race, income and opportunity because of the race relations…

    • 2390 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In June of 1994, in Los Angeles County, California, Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman were murdered just outside of the former’s condominium. Not much later, O.J. Simpson was arrested for the double homicide. Evidence pointing towards Simpson’s guilt was powerful and plentiful. This included Nicole’s blood found on Simpson’s sock, Simpson’s hair on Goldman’s body, and a pair of bloody gloves, one found near the victims and the other in Simpson’s home. The biggest factor in determining the outcome of Simpson’s trial turned out to be the bloody glove found at the crime scene, which did not fit Simpson’s left hand. Despite all the evidence, Simpson’s legal team was able to prove him innocent because of this unexplainable uncertainty. Whether…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1995, OJ Simpson was tried for the murder of Nicole Brown Simpson (his ex-wife) and her friend, Ron Goldman. Surprisingly, the twelve jurors found OJ Simpson not guilty in spite of a lengthy and highly publicized trial. I believe the jury’s not guilty verdict was a result of many reasons. The defendant was a popular athlete and actor whom many looked up to and admired. His main defense lawyers, Robert Shapiro, and Johnnie Cochran were top notch. During jury selection, both defense and prosecution used stereotypes and background checks to predict whether OJ would be found guilty. The jury was composed of nine blacks, one Hispanic and two whites, meaning the majority was minority. Out of the twelve jurors, nine thought that OJ was less likely to be a murderer because he was a professional athlete. Another solid reason for OJ’s release was that his defense lawyers claimed that there was police fraud and that the DNA evidence was mishandled. The Jurors heard over and over again about the Los Angeles police department and major miss conduct. This trial was the most highly followed criminal trial of all time. National surveys following the trial showed the differences between how blacks and whites viewed the case. In fact, the Los Angeles government and police feared major racial riots if OJ was convicted.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Scottsboro Trial

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Scottsboro boys were all accused of raping two white women when they actually were just riding a freight train. They had one of the best criminal lawyers at that time period, but didn’t win the tedious case. The boys and lawyers fought hard to win, but there were many barriers in the way. The barriers included a bias based on their skin color and their handicapped appearance. When the boys were put to trial, the world was in a state of extreme racial turmoil. Many were for racism; however, many were opposed to the idea. Everyone on the case was narrow-minded, which was very unfortunate for the boys. The fact that the boys were Negroes gave them a disadvantage at actually winning the case. That was very unfair because regardless of their color, they were still innocent. Also, the 12 jurors from the case, which included everyday people, were all white. Equally important, the Scottsboro boys had gone against an all-white jury in the trial, which was a violation of their right of equal protection under law. On the other hand, the boys didn’t have a great physical appearance. For instance, one of the boys, Willie Robeson had suffered from syphilis and Olin Montgomery was nearly blind. Their outer appearance was used as an excuse in court, that they “looked” like rapists. That was also a detriment towards the defense. Even though, the boys had Leibowitz, one of the best lawyers at the time, they lost the case. All…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Racial injustice in the United States is provoked not by the law of the land, but rather exists in the minds of its citizens. Legal prejudice, like segregation, ended long before now, however it is still a problem facing our nation today. Research and studies, as well as many Supreme Court cases can support the idea that racial injustice is a product of the mind rather than the law.…

    • 694 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays