Why Is Oj Simpson Guilty
O.J. Simpson is an ex NFL player who was put on trial for the murder of his ex-wife Nicole Brown and Ronald Goldman. O.J.’s trial is one of the most controversial and most popular cases to this day. His wife was brutally killed and no one got punished for it. O.J. received a not guilty verdict and was let free. I believe that O.J. Simpson’s verdict should have been guilty because of the evidence on the scene, because of his book that was later published, and because of his 3 or 4 changes in alibi for the time of the murders.
On June 12, 1994 Nicole Brown saw the sunrise for the last time. Nicole and Ronald Goldman, Nicole’s close friend, were killed outside Nicole’s house on 875 South Bundy Drive. Both of them being stabbed to death, and …show more content…
was guilty was because of the evidence at the scene and on his belongings. 1.5ml of O.J. Simpson’s blood was missing from the lab, so the defense made it seem that the blood was stolen and then planted at the crime scene. “The prosecution of Simpson’s case presented compelling DNA evidence, including matching bloody footprints, hair follicles and a glove found near Simpson’s home containing blood that tested positive to the blood of Goldman”(101.5, 2012). Blood from the killings was also found on the handle of O.J. Simpson’s Ford Bronco, but the defense said it was planted on his car from the blood missing from the lab. A bloody footprint at the scene was also found that was identical to O.J.’s shoe print. The killer also left a glove at the scene of the crime but when O.J. tried the glove on, he made it seem like it didn’t fit and the defense also made the court believe that the glove was placed at the crime scene by a racist cop looking to help convict O.J. The evidence found and collected was plenty enough to convict O.J. but the defense flipped the whole trial from being about murder to racism. I do not believe the prosecutors did a well enough job to charge O.J. because of their lack of patience or because the blood from the crime scene was stolen and made it seem like the white cops were out to get him. Either way it goes, O.J. had a good lawyer or a good enough lawyer to beat the
On June 12, 1994 Nicole Brown saw the sunrise for the last time. Nicole and Ronald Goldman, Nicole’s close friend, were killed outside Nicole’s house on 875 South Bundy Drive. Both of them being stabbed to death, and …show more content…
was guilty was because of the evidence at the scene and on his belongings. 1.5ml of O.J. Simpson’s blood was missing from the lab, so the defense made it seem that the blood was stolen and then planted at the crime scene. “The prosecution of Simpson’s case presented compelling DNA evidence, including matching bloody footprints, hair follicles and a glove found near Simpson’s home containing blood that tested positive to the blood of Goldman”(101.5, 2012). Blood from the killings was also found on the handle of O.J. Simpson’s Ford Bronco, but the defense said it was planted on his car from the blood missing from the lab. A bloody footprint at the scene was also found that was identical to O.J.’s shoe print. The killer also left a glove at the scene of the crime but when O.J. tried the glove on, he made it seem like it didn’t fit and the defense also made the court believe that the glove was placed at the crime scene by a racist cop looking to help convict O.J. The evidence found and collected was plenty enough to convict O.J. but the defense flipped the whole trial from being about murder to racism. I do not believe the prosecutors did a well enough job to charge O.J. because of their lack of patience or because the blood from the crime scene was stolen and made it seem like the white cops were out to get him. Either way it goes, O.J. had a good lawyer or a good enough lawyer to beat the