Capital Punishment. Custom Capital Punishment Essay Writing Service || Capital Punishment Essay samples, help Introduction
Capital punishment refers to the infliction of death on a person who has broken the law, as a punishment. Capital punishment has existed in the world since ancient times. Legal systems use capital punishment on people for various offences. With an increase in the use of capital punishment, people started arguing of whether capital punishment the legal system should continue using capital punishment or stop. The two sides bring forward their reasons as to why they support capital punishment or do not support it. Capital punishment involves killing people through either hanging or any other way. People should understand that killing people for the crime they committed does not serve to prevent others from committing the same crime. Thesis statement
I do not support capital punishment because it is against humanity, human rights and forgiveness. It is the cause of family hardships and suffering. This paper explores why people should stop using capital punishment. Discussion
Capital punishment goes against humanity. Capital punishment also known as the death penalty uses techniques that undermine humanity. When undertaking capital punishment, the process involves hanging, firing bullets, slaughter, inducing death through drugs and any other way causes psychological torture and physical pain. Humanity requires that people treat others with dignity they deserve even when they have done mistakes. Capital punishment does not have any form of dignity. The whole process functions more of a revenge rather than punishment. Punishment should offer a corrective measure to the individual who has committed a crime. It should make the person who committed a crime understand that they did a wrong thing. They have to understand their mistake and take the punishment that works towards changing them so that they do not commit the same offense again. Humanity involves giving people a second chance to do something in a better way. Capital punishment does not offer people a chance to correct their mistakes. Capital punishment involves ending the life of people; it shutters their dreams and does not give them a chance to prove that they did the wrong thing. Sometimes the court convicts people for the mistakes they did not do just because they could not prove their innocence. It could be fair for people in such circumstances to have a second chance to prove their innocence. Capital punishment does not offer them that chance. Therefore, capital punishment is inhumane in all considerations. Sometimes, people commit crimes mistakenly. Legal systems become inhumane when they do not offer people in such situations a second chance and decide to end their lives through capital punishment (May, 2005). Capital punishment does not respect human rights. Human rights require that people own a right to life even when they have committed crimes of whatever level. Capital punishment has a single way of handling all people pertained to have committed a crime worth that kind of punishment. That happens through death irrespective of the way used. It involves killing. Human rights does not support killing. Death should only come from the creator. Human rights require that legal and court systems including the trial process and the people involved in the trial respect life as a quality beyond human control. Therefore, any action that leads to the death of a person violates human rights. In any sense, capital punishment involves violent actions against humanity that violates human rights. Any person has a right to life irrespective of the offense he or she has committed. For instance, in a case where a person has killed another person intentionally or unintentionally, legal systems should not punish the person with the use of capital punishment because that functions as revenge. Human rights prohibit revenge and any form of...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document