Preview

P1 FINISHED

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
598 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
P1 FINISHED
P1: DESCRIBE THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ARREST WITH AND WITHOUT A WARRANT

Police officers have many powers but these rights can only take place if the officer has proof that they are a police officer, they can either prove it by their uniform or by their warrant card. Your warrant card helps you if you are off duty and for example a fight kicks off, you would need to show your warrant card to make them aware that you are a police officer.
The most common types of power would be stopping and searching someone or asking someone a question if they look suspicious, for example, stop and search; stop and search means that the police have the right to stop and question you at any time, and they can search you depending on the situation.
A police officer has powers to stop and search you if they suspect you are carrying; Illegal drugs, a weapon, stolen property, something that can be used to commit a crime e.g. a crowbar.
A Police Community Support Officer (PCSO) must be in uniform to stop and search you, a police officer doesn’t have to be in uniform but they must show you their warrant card before. The police also have the right to stop and question you, they have to be either in uniform or show you their warrant card. A police officer can stop you at any time and ask you questions like, What you're doing, why you're in an area or where are you going, However you do not have to answer any of the questions the police officer asks you.

The police also have the right to use reasonable force if you try to escape or become violent. They also have the right to arrest you, they can handcuff you and they have the right to search you while you’re arrested.
Although the police have many rights and powers they also have to follow the rules too, police officers can only force entry if they have a warrant and they can only arrest if they see someone committing a crime.
If a police officer is arresting someone in public they do not need a warrant because they have witnesses

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Can police stop a person without probable cause? Can police search a person stopped without probable cause?…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Is a warrantless entry justified during emergency situation even if the police create the emergency situation through exigent circumstances?…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    united states supreme court ruled that police officers that have a warrant to arrest someone can enter a home just to arrest the person only if they have the reason to believe the person actually lives there. The same standard was applied for officers when they are conducting a parole or probation search. The…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paralegal Studies

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As I have reviewed a few cases within the Ivy Tech Library, I have found that there is nothing that can be done at the specific time to resist unlawful police entry in Indiana. The matter of the unlawful entry in each case I studied had to be resolved in court or the Court of Appeals. The first case I wish to bring to attention to is Sandridge verses State, Court of Appeals. Two officers, responding to a phone call, are refused entry by Steven Sandridge. They forced the door open and wrestled Steven to the couch. At the couch Steven was chemically sprayed and cuffed. He argued in his appeal that he was wrongly arrested by the officers who forced entry without a warrant. The Court of Appeals found that entry was lawful under the Fourth Amendment: Article 1 Section 11 of the Indiana Constitution. At the time the police officers had responded to an emergency 911 call. The officers had no idea if someone was in danger, injured, or could injure another.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An officer may order a motorist out of a car to ensure the officer’s safety.(quiz law) The police officer may conduct a pat-down search to ensure there are no weapons.(quiz law) The “pat-down” is a quick search of a person’s being in order to determine if any weapons are present. Officer Smith’s pat-down was legal because it was necessary to ensure his safety.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    week 2 discussion

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Police officers have a limited local jurisdiction, usually within the boundaries of a city or town. They look for public safety, while they cite and arrest people who are breaking the law within their jurisdiction. They also do a lot of public services like safety education classes.…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Current law allows police officers to conduct stop and frisk searches of persons based on reasonable suspicion, as determined by Terry v. Ohio where supreme court decisions determined that individuals can be searched not only for probable cause (where an individual is under suspicion of committing a specific crime) but also for reasonable suspicion (where an individual is thought to be taking part in of have taken part of a crime, using facts and beliefs at hand which a reasonable inferences can be drawn from). In these instances, a pat down can be done only for the search of weapons for the preservation of the officers’ safety. The officer cannot manipulate objects not believed to be weapons in order to determine if they are other illegal substances (Minnesota v. Dickerson). Additionally the police need to notice something in your actions that makes you suspicious (Rogers v. Arizona). The police cannot stop a person because of protected status such as race, gender etc. When police are conducting an investigation, you have to cooperate with them or you might be arrested as well.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    police are allowed to use so called " stop and frisk " searches, so long as they have reasonable…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Police Officer Violations

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Police officer’s main responsibility is their roll to enforce the laws that exist to provide for public safety and the protection of our individual rights as citizens of the United States. In the 2007 State of New York v. Oliver, Isnora, and Cooper case, it was appropriate to prosecute the five police officers for assault, wrongful death, various civil rights violations, and negligence of duty. When the case first started, the police officers disregarded the fourth amendment which states that if a police officer has reasonable suspicion to believe that a crime may be afoot, he can briefly stop the suspicious person to make reasonable inquires aimed at dispelling or confirming the officers conjecture. The officer also needs a warrant that is…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Good job stating and explaining the two types of arrest, Criminal and Civil. It’s important to know that the Fourth Amendment protects any individual under arrest. Officer must make sure that they make an arrest valid or else the arrest could be suppressed and any evidence involved could be tossed out. Officers must make sure there is probable cause, or an arrest warrant in order to prevent any arrest from being invalid. Like you said an officer can question you, but you have the option to not…

    • 88 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are several differences between stops and arrests. As an exception to the Probable Cause and warrant requirements a stop has to have the underlining basis of reasonable suspicion. At its core a police stop is when an officer stops you from doing anything that you were doing prior and after an officer has observed an individual doing something suspicious. While an arrest is an officer actually taking a person into police custody. If a stop is arbitrary or not supported by reasonable suspicion, probable cause, or another legitimate road safety or traffic management reason it is in violation of the 4th Amendment. (Hall, 2015). The Supreme Court has also held that the validity of a stop is determined by whether there is probable cause exists…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Legal Awareness

    • 1987 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Legal Awareness: Valid Warrantless Arrest No. 3: A police officer or a private person may, without a warrant arrest a person when the person to be arrested is a prisoner who has escaped from a penal establishment, or has escaped while being transferred from one confinement to another.…

    • 1987 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cml2117

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages

    -ex. Search and seizure can a cop search a car yes/no why? When they can search etc…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The constitutional protection of the person against arbitrary arrests is guaranteed by the general rule that the police should first secure an arrest warrant. However, there can be cases of valid arrests without a warrant of arrest. To be valid, the minimal requirement is “probable cause.” There must be a reasonable ground of suspicion, supported by circumstances to believe that the person to be arrested is guilty.…

    • 12387 Words
    • 50 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Police are empowered by Sec.41, 42, 151 and 432 (3) of Cr.P.C. to arrest without a warrant.…

    • 2857 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics