Preview

Terry Vs Ohio Case Study

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
200 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Terry Vs Ohio Case Study
Terry v. Ohio 392 U.S. (1968) Facts:
Plainclothes Officer McFadden was patrolling downtown Cleveland to suppress purse swatches, shoplifting, and robbery of merchants plus shoppers when he observed John W. Terry and two cohorts case a corner store for a robbery. Officer McFadden became suspicious, went up to the three men and conducted a pat-down. When the officer pat-down the outside of Terry's coat, he felt something hard in Terry's outer pocket that felt like a gun. McFadden reached into that pocket only and confiscated an illegally possessed gun. Officer proceeded and arrested Terry.
Issue:
Can police stop a person without probable cause? Can police search a person stopped without probable cause?
Holding:
Affirmed. Police may

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    P1 FINISHED

    • 598 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A police officer has powers to stop and search you if they suspect you are carrying; Illegal drugs, a weapon, stolen property, something that can be used to commit a crime e.g. a crowbar.…

    • 598 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The term Bailment is derived from the French Bailor, "to deliver". A bailment is a temporary transfer of property to another for a limited time and for a specific purpose. The transfer of property in a bailment is only in regards to possession, not ownership. The bailor is the owner of the transferred property. The bailee holds the transferred property. The property is held in trust for the benefit of the bailor. A bailment is completely different from a bail bond.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Facts: Terry Hutchison was a self-employed lawyer until two years ago when he retired. He had a…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Bridgeport, Connecticut around 2:15 a.m in the morning, Sergeant Connolly received a tip from an informant that a suspect who was sitting in a vehicle early in the morning at a high crime area carrying narcotics and a gun at his waist. After calling for backup, Sergeant Connolly approached to the vehicle and tapped on the widow and asked Robert Williams (the suspect) to open the door. Instead of opening the door, Robert Williams rolled down the window. At this time, Sergeant Connolly reached in and removed a fully loaded gun from the Robert Williams’s waist. Also, the gun was not visible from outside the car, but it exactly where the informant said it was. After arresting Robert Williams for illegal possession of a handgun, heroin and a…

    • 148 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Wisconsin v. Avery is a major case between Steven A. Avery and the state of Wisconsin. Steven Avery was born on July 9, 1962 and grew up in a very small area knows as Manitowoc county in the state of Wisconsin. His family owns an auto salvage yard where abandoned vehicles are obtained for the sale of parts. Avery was not a smart man, his IQ was seventy and he “barely functioned in school”. He had a very rough childhood and he turned to crime through his teens and into his twenties. In 1981, Avery and and his friend were charged with burglary at a local bar and were each sentenced to two years in…

    • 116 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    4)The case we read in class that I enjoyed the most was State of Connecticut v. Cardwell. I primarily liked it because it best exemplifies the difference and complexity regarding the sale of goods and the helps reflect the distinction between a “shipment” and “destination” contracts. I disagree with the trial courts judgment that Cardwell sold tickets within Connecticut and thereby violated Connecticut statute. However, I agree with the judgment of the court after the appeal. The transfer of goods occurred in Massachuestes, therefore the sale of the tickets, as defined by the code, occurred in Massachusts.…

    • 97 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jackson V Indiana, 435 U.S. 975, 98 S. Ct. 1623, 56 L. Ed. 2d 69 (1978)…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mapp V. Ohio Case Brief

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 1081, 81 S. Ct. 1684, 6 L. Ed. 2d 1081 (1961)…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Early in the morning, on October 5th 2002, five Edmonton Police officers, including Constable (Cst.) A. Normand (No. 1809), Cst. P. Blais (No. 1900), Cst. R. Sparreboom (No. 2309), Cst. R. Foote (Resigned) and Cst. Mike Wasylyshen responded to a complaint of an attempted car theft on Abbosttfield road. When the officers arrived on scene they immediately demanded that the four occupants exit the vehicle, without first running a licence plate search (Edmonton sun, 2012). Three of the four occupants exited the vehicle leaving only Randy Fryingpan left asleep on the backseat (Edmonton Sun, 2012). Randy Fryingpan had been unresponsive to Constable Mike Wasylyshen’s demands to exit the vehicle as a result of alcohol consumption. Cst. M. Wasylyshen decided to Taser Randy…

    • 1738 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The case of Thompson versus Oklahoma raises a number of issues regarding the trials and punishment of juveniles for heinous crimes. This case was argued on November 9, 1987 and involves the trial of fifteen-year-old William Wayne Thompson. Along with his older brother and two friends, William Thomspon brutally murdered Charles Keene, his sister’s husband. His motive was revenge for abusing his sister. William Thompson was a “child” according to Oklahoma law, but he was tried as an adult, convicted with murder, and sentenced to death. The Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma upheld this ruling. Because he was only fifteen years old at the time of the murder, this ruling violated the Eighth Amendment, causing this case to be brought to the Supreme…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The respondent was convicted in Dallas County Criminal Court of desecration of a venerated object in violation of a Texas statute. He was sentenced to one year in prison and fined $2000. The respondent appealed his conviction through the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas. They affirmed the decision of the lower court. The respondent then petitioned for discretionary review by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. This court then reversed the decision finding Johnson’s flag burning to be “symbolic speech” protected by the First Amendment. Certiorari was granted. The case went to the Supreme Court.…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mapp V. Ohio Case Study

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mapp v. Ohio, noteworthy court case of 1961. The US Supreme Court decided that when the state officers attained evidence through illegal searches and seizures might not be admissible into criminal trials. The case was about a Cleveland lady, Dolly Mapp, who was held for having obscene materials. Law enforcement had learned the materials in Dolly Mapp house during their illegal search. When the state convicted, Dolly Mapp appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. Her argument was that her constitutional rights was violated under the Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution, that prohibits unjust searches and seizures. “The U.S. Supreme Court accepted her appeal and consented to her argument. They stated that any illegally obtained evidence should…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jessica Tice 10/10/17 Dear Dr. Concerned, In response to your questions about the rights of public health officials, I find that there are a great many details to consider. As I am sure you are aware, the United States Supreme Court decision in 1905 on the Jacobson v. Massachusetts case set a legal precedent in situations such as these. The ruling stated that the Board of Health had the right to require citizens to receive vaccinations in order to control a spreading smallpox epidemic . Legally, this supports the rights of you and your colleagues at the CDC to do what you deem necessary to protect public health, even if it may infringe upon the personal liberties of citizens.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Facts: Gregg argues that capital punishment is cruel and unusual, so it violates his constitutional rights protected under the Eighth Amendment. In 1972 the U.S, Supreme Court ruled in Furman v. Georgia, that the death penalty couldn’t be used in an arbitrary manner, in any state.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mapp V Ohio

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to the Court’s decision, why may illegally seized evidence not be used in a trial?…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays