Preview

Mustafa Kemal Atatürk: The First President of Turkey

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
360 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mustafa Kemal Atatürk: The First President of Turkey
Mustafa Kemal Atatürk (indeterminate, 1881–10 November 1938) was a Turkish army officer, revolutionary statesman, and founder of the Republic of Turkey as well as its first President.

Atatürk became known as an extremely capable military officer by being the only undefeated Ottoman commander during World War I.[1] Following the defeat of the Ottoman Empire, he led the Turkish national movement in the Turkish War of Independence. Having established a provisional government in Ankara, he defeated the forces sent by the Allies. His successful military campaigns led to the liberation of the country and to the establishment of Turkey. During his presidency, Atatürk embarked upon a program of political, economic, and cultural reforms. An admirer of the Age of Enlightenment, he sought to transform the former Ottoman Empire into a modern, democratic, and secular nation-state. The principles of Atatürk's reforms, upon which modern Turkey was established, are referred to as Kemalism.

Early life
Main article: Mustafa Kemal Atatürk's personal life
Born as Mustafa, his second name Kemal (meaning Perfection or Maturity) was given to him by his mathematics teacher in recognition of his academic excellence.[2] He was born to a turkish family living in Thessaloniki. Mustafa’s mother was Zubeyde Hanim (1857-1923), a devout Muslim and "as fair as any Slav from beyond the Bulgarian frontier" with "fine white" skin and "eyes of a deep but clear light blue". [3] In his early years, his mother encouraged Mustafa to attend a religious school, something he did reluctantly and only briefly. Later, he attended Şemsi Efendi school (a private school with a more secular curriculum) at the direction of his father. His parents wanted him to have education in a trade, but without consulting them, Atatürk took an entrance exam for a military junior high school in Thessaloniki (in Turkish, Selanik, which was an Ottoman city at that time) in 1893. In 1896, he enrolled into a military high

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    13. What groups were formed as a result of the Ottoman Empire’s reforms and what did each group advocate?…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ch19 answers

    • 4110 Words
    • 15 Pages

    17. In what ways did the Ottoman state under Sultan Selim III try to reform itself in its…

    • 4110 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mustafa Kemal’s impact on the modern Turkish state is irrefutable, so much so that he was given the name Atatürk by the national assembly, meaning “father of the Turks”, banning anyone else from using this name. Turkey, one of the few culturally Islamic nations without a Sharia legal system , is often referred to as one of the most modernized states with a Muslim majority . Atatürk is often attributed with the modernization of Turkey, through, amongst other things, social, political and economic reform. Kemalism, the founding ideology of the republic of Turkey, was a series of extensive programs of reform aimed at modernizing Turkey through six pillars, referred to as the six arrows of Kemalism, namely nationalism, republicanism, secularism,…

    • 1722 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    1) What did Truman tell Congress the United States had received from the Greek Governments?…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unlike the Spanish, the Ottoman Empire as a land-based empire that dominated the Middle East right up to Eastern Europe. The economy of the Ottoman Turks was based on conquering new lands and exploiting them for their value. The Ottoman’s continued to conquer, not only so their economies wouldn’t fall but also to spread their religion, Islam. Unlike the Spanish, they did have some religious tolerance in their empire, but hey mostly forcefully converted who they conquered The Ottoman Empire was an ethnocentric one, not open to too many outside ideas. The Empire was reigned over by a religious leader know as the Sultan, but his advisors, or the viziers were the rue voices of the government. They made those who didn’t covert to Islam their military or the janissaries, unlike the Spanish who just enslaved or killed…

    • 3201 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the Ottoman Empire, Armenians had some freedoms, but nevertheless were treated as second class ("Turkey"). In the middle of the 19th century, under the pressure by Russia, France, and Britain, the Ottoman government started passing the Tanzimat reforms, which were supposed to improve the conditions for minorities, but turned out ineffective ("Facts about the Armenian Genocide"); nevertheless, Armenians remained passive during this time ("Facts about the Armenian Genocide"). During the 1860, however, they began to ask for better treatment; when Russia vanquished Turkey in the Russo-Turkish war of 1878, they started relying on Tsarist Russia for acquiring this better treatment ("Facts about the Armenian…

    • 2839 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ottoman Empire

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What do the inscription Suleyman the Magnificent and the excerpts from Busbecq's letters reveal about the Ottoman Empire?…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The empire began to disintegrate as the Ottomans lost battle after battle, and the Serbs, Romanians, and Greeks gained their independence. The Arabs in the Middle East and Armenians were all that remained in the Ottoman Empire under the rule of Sultan Abdul Hamid. Since the empire was in decline, young Armenian people gradually began to demand political reforms, a constitutional government, and an end to discriminatory taxes directed at Armenians because of their Christian beliefs. The Sultan ignored their pleas and the young Armenians were persecuted. Years later, an organization called the Young Turks eventually altered the future of the Armenian people because of their vicious acts against them in the form of a genocide.…

    • 1392 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    An introduction, a body and a conclusion. The introduction presents the relation between the house of Osman and the system of the Ottoman empire. The body will explore how the Ottoman empire rose to power through providing a detailed timeline, how did their relationship with the western world affected their traditions and system which indirectly lead to downfall of powerful empire. The conclusion sums up all the of findings.…

    • 1473 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    These three leps puted women into a higher societal status and these changes is due to Ataturk. “A society must accept all the conditions and necessities on which its success on life depends” (Document B: Ataturk, Speech 1) “Society” call as society is because it need to tolerate everything, everyone in this world. But in 19th century, society did not put that much attention and lack of interest on women and that makes the society paralyzed. After Ataturk's speech based on society will make people to accept women based on the balance of society. Indeed they will find out women do really well or even better than men in arts, services, management and many other industries. “our women must be more enlightened, more intellectual and more learned than men if they...to be the mother of the nation” (Document C: Ataturk, Speech 2) On Ataturk’s second speech he point out a most important thing about women -- they are the one who bought up valuable sons and daughters. Instead of talking about justified whether women should has equitable interest or not. He approached this problem in another way. Women rise up the future of a country (sons and daughters -- youth) so she must be more…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Ottomans inherited a rich mixture of political traditions from vastly disparate ethnic groups: Turks, Persians, Mongols, Mesopotamian and, of course, Islam. The Ottoman state, like the Turkish, Mongol, and Mesopotamian states rested on a principle of absolute authority in the monarch. The nature of Ottoman autocracy, however, is greatly misunderstood and misinterpreted in the West, particularly in world history textbooks.…

    • 1985 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government before the first World War, was trying to convince the Turkish people that the only way for the empire to succeed and persist was to promote the ideology of Turkish nationalism (Turgay). This ideology that caused the massacres of the Armenian people, also caused the modern government to place restrictions on speaking of the atrocities. This has caused national stigma, and therefore a hesitance to admit to any wrongs the “great nation” of Turkey has committed. Although much of the hesitance to admit to the genocide stems from the government and their conservative viewpoints. It has greatly affected how the current generation of Turkey reacts to the issue. The nationalist views of the early twenties and twentieth century have carried over into the education system today. The pattern of denial is learned in schools, and reinforced by media highlighting the alleged treachery of Armenians who fought with the invading Russians and showcasing the dozens of Turkish diplomats killed by the Armenian Secret Army for the Liberation of Armenia…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Except for republicanism, all these had actually firm Ottoman roots, not in form of doctrine or principle but as characteristics of the modernization process, and as a part of the Ottoman polity14. Secularization/laicization was one of the essential characteristics of the Ottoman modernization since, roughly to say, the second half of the nineteenth century; early writings on the history of the Turks began at the same time and by the end of the century, Turkism, then denoting Turkish nationalism, became one of the cornerstones of political thought among intellectuals. Populism was one of the components of the ideology of the Committee of Union and Progress, which was the party in power in between 1908-18. Etatism emerged as practical and pragmatic economic policy during the First World War. That is to say, Mustafa Kemal was not the creator of these principles; instead, he was the political leader that systemized them as a political program tobe implemented for the transformation of Turkey into a modern state. Nevertheless, he and the bureaucratic elite surrounding him presented them as novelty through which the state and nation would catch up the contemporary and…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gandhi vs. Kemal

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Turkey maintained their national independence and the Allies were finally over with all the fighting. The Turkish independence was preserved, and everyone was happy. Now in 1923, after everything was settled and there was peace, many new changes happened under Kemal. First, Kemal made changes in the government. He got rid of the Ottoman empire, overthrew the Sultan, and made Turkey a republic. Next, Kemal secularized Turkey (secularized- no main religion in place). Turkey had been an Islamic Empire but when Kemal overthrew the Sultan, the religion was no longer dominant. Kemal tried to separate church and state, like the Europeans. No established religion, none was above the other. Religion was now a private affair. This was a revolutionary move on Kemal's…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    His father was an impoverished bey from Frashër, Kolonje, now District of Përmet. Naim studied at the Zosimea, Greek high school, in Ioannina, back then the city was part of the Ottoman Empire.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays