Knowledge Management and Organizational Culture: Toward a Broader Perspective on How Organizational Culture Impacts Knowledge Management.
Knowledge Management and Organizational Culture: Toward a broader perspective on how organizational culture impacts knowledge management.
The words knowledge and management are two extremely broad concepts when separated. When the two words come together, it speaks of an idea that strives to organize information in a way that produces an advantage for an organization. While anyone would think that harnessing the knowledge of an organization is a positive thing to do, there are many who do not see the value of knowledge management.
The origins of knowledge management can be traced back to the late 1970s. Everett Rogers (deceased) and Thomas Allen’s work in information transfer laid the foundation to the concept of how knowledge is created, implemented, and integrated throughout an organization. In the 1980s, knowledge became a focal point to increasing the competitive edge for companies. Scholars like Peter Senge introduced the advantages of creating learning and knowledge based organization.
Knowledge management can be applied to many areas of the organization. Organizations need to understand that knowledge management is not only storing knowledge. The larger focus is on sharing; therefore the application of knowledge management in the organization is unlimited. Groups at all level, e.g. boards of directors, human resources, workforce training and development, information technology, frontline staff and operations can all benefit from knowledge management. An organization’s willingness to apply knowledge management to one or more of these organizational structures lead to more effective knowledge systems. In order for an effective knowledge system to exist organizations must first hold and transfer data and information that can be placed into context allowing an actionable event or an understanding to occur.
What is Knowledge?
The word knowledge is often confused for information or data. The online version of the Merriam-Webster dictionary defines
The words knowledge and management are two extremely broad concepts when separated. When the two words come together, it speaks of an idea that strives to organize information in a way that produces an advantage for an organization. While anyone would think that harnessing the knowledge of an organization is a positive thing to do, there are many who do not see the value of knowledge management.
The origins of knowledge management can be traced back to the late 1970s. Everett Rogers (deceased) and Thomas Allen’s work in information transfer laid the foundation to the concept of how knowledge is created, implemented, and integrated throughout an organization. In the 1980s, knowledge became a focal point to increasing the competitive edge for companies. Scholars like Peter Senge introduced the advantages of creating learning and knowledge based organization.
Knowledge management can be applied to many areas of the organization. Organizations need to understand that knowledge management is not only storing knowledge. The larger focus is on sharing; therefore the application of knowledge management in the organization is unlimited. Groups at all level, e.g. boards of directors, human resources, workforce training and development, information technology, frontline staff and operations can all benefit from knowledge management. An organization’s willingness to apply knowledge management to one or more of these organizational structures lead to more effective knowledge systems. In order for an effective knowledge system to exist organizations must first hold and transfer data and information that can be placed into context allowing an actionable event or an understanding to occur.
What is Knowledge?
The word knowledge is often confused for information or data. The online version of the Merriam-Webster dictionary defines
Bibliography: Ali A. Alawneh,Amer Abuali,Tamara Y. Almarabeh. (2009). The role of knowledge management in enhancing the competitiveness of small and medium-sized enterprises (smes) Blosch, M. (1999). The New Knowledge Management Supermodel: How Process Maps Trigger Knowledge Transfer Bock, F. (1999). The Intelligent Approach to Knowledge Management: Viewing KM in Terms of Content, Culture, Process, and Infrastructure Davenport, T.H. and De Long, D.W. (1998). Successful Knowledge Management Projects Davenport, T.H. and Prusak, Laurence. (2000). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know De Long, D.W. and Fahey, L. (2000). Diagnosing Cultural Barriers to Knowledge Management De Long, D.W. and Seeman, P. (2000). Confronting Conceptual Confusion and Conflict in Knowledge Management Drucker, P. (1988). The Coming of the New Organization. Harvard Business Review, Jan-Feb 1988, 45-53. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: the birth of a prison. London, Penguin. Gupta, A.K. and Govindarajan, V. (2000). Knowledge Management 's Social Dimension: Lessons From Nucor Steel 29, 2001 from EBSCO (Business Source Elite). Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation Rastogi, P.N. (2000). Knowledge Management and Intellectual Capital - The New Virtuous Reality of Competitiveness