Preview

Just War Is Unjust

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
15274 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Just War Is Unjust
(Return to CO.Quaker.org Home Page) 2013-07-09T16:58:18#BeginEditable "Heading" Just and Unjust War2013-07-09T16:58:18#EndEditable 2013-07-09T16:58:18#BeginEditable "body" by Howard ZinnReprinted (with permission of the author) from the book Declarations of Independence, (...also found in The Zinn Reader, and Howard Zinn on War) I enlisted in the Army Air Corps in World War II and was an eager bombardier, determined to do everything I could to help defeat fascism. Yet, at the end of the war, when I collected my little mementos--my photos, logs of some of my missions--I wrote on the folder, without really thinking, and surprising myself: "Never Again." In the years after the war, I began to plumb the reasons for that spontaneous reaction, and came to the conclusions which I describe in the following essay, published as a chapter in my book Declarations of Independence (HarperCollins, 1990). Years before (in Postwar America, Bobbs Merrill, 1973), I had written an essay called "The Best of Wars," in which I questioned--I was unaware of anyone else asking the same question--the total acceptance of World War II. After my own experience in that war, I had moved away from my own rather orthodox view that there are just wars and unjust wars, to a universal rejection of war as a solution to any human problem. Of all the positions I have taken over the years on questions of history and politics, this has undoubtedly aroused the most controversy. It is obviously a difficult viewpoint to present persuasively. I try to do that here, and leave it to the reader to judge whether I have succeeded. There are some people who do not question war. In 1972, the general who was head of the U.S. Strategic Air Command told an interviewer, "I've been asked often about my moral scruples if I had to send the planes out with hydrogen bombs. My answer is always the same. I would be concerned only with my professional responsibility." It was a Machiavellian reply. Machiavelli did not ask if

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Gi Bill of 1944

    • 4063 Words
    • 17 Pages

    “We’re finally home boys!” shouted one of the young invigorated soldiers as the plane landed on the runway. The young men arriving from the European and Japanese fronts were filled with excitement but among them there resonated a feeling of unknown. World War II had finally come to a conclusion and what the future held for many young men in the middle of the 1940’s was completely unknown. The only feeling of security that the soldiers returning home was the feeling of winning. The feeling of satisfaction persisted among the American soldiers that they had avenged the tragedy of Pearl Harbor. The same feeling of satisfaction existed on the European front as they had helped the other European powers stop the Fascist Nazi’s. Among the men there was a contagious energy in which many had never had the opportunity to experience in many of their lifetimes. These men and women had just accomplished one of the most incredible feats of the twentieth century and it was now time for them to return to America and start the rest of their lives.…

    • 4063 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Its the ordinary men and women who’ve made us what we are. Monstrous, complacent and mad. Remember that. Even if I do sound a moralizing fool, I’ll risk it. After all - I’m pretty old. I could be gone tomorrow! There may not be anybody else who’ll say this to you. Everyone’s so sophisticated these days they can’t stand the hot lights. Eh? well - I saw both wars. And I’m here to tell you the passions involved were as ordinary as me and my sister Bessie fighting over who’s going to cook the dinner. And who won’t! Those people in the park - you - me - everyone - the greatest mistakes we made is was to imagine something magical separated us from Ludendorff and hitchner and Foch. Our Leaders, you see. Well - Churchill and Hitler for that matter! Why such men are just the butcher and the grocer - selling us meat and potatoes across the counter. That’s what binds us together. They appeal to our basest instincts. The lowest common denominator. And then we turn we turn around and call them extraordinary! see what I mean? You have to be carefully careful how you define the extraordinary. Especially nowadays. Robert Ross was no Hitler. That was the problem.”…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: Zinn, Howard. Passionate Declarations: Essays on War and Justice. New York: HarperCollins, 2003. Print.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    War Without Mercy

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Throughout the years there have been many books written about the Great World Wars. As a young child, my grandfather who served on the U.S.S Indianapolis owned a massive amount of books specifically about World War II. Every day that I spent with him we would flip through the pages of the endless books at our disposal. He would reminisce and tell me all of his war stories with great enthusiasm until he was blue in the face. He sparked an interest of history and World War II in me at such a young age and this interest carried with me. Reading John W. Dower’s book War Without Mercy reminded me of all the great memories that my grandfather and I shared. In this book, Dower tackles the idea that the United States went to greater lengths vilifying and dehumanizing the Japanese than the Germans during the Second World War. Over the course of this paper I will analyze and interpret this book providing needed information as well as a general overview.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Vietnam War Just or Unjust

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Some ask the question, was the Vietnam War just? Some may say yes it was just,and others say that it is unjust. However,Certain people view justice as slippery concept. There are always ways to get aroud justice, and that is why people believe that justice is a slippety concept. Even Plato one of the brightest of his time could not figure out whether war was just or unjust. A Certain individual, by the name of Aquinas, also attempted to elaborate his view on the war through the document Summa Theologica. His reasons consisted of, First, the authority of the sovereign by whose command the war is to be waged(Article 1). The second reason being, a just cause is required, namely that those who are attacked, should be attacked because they deserve it on account of some fault(Article 1). Thirdly, it is necessary that the belligerents should have a rightful intention, so that they intend the advancement of good, or the avoidance of evil(Article 1). In the article of Summa Theologica, he alos talks about whether it is just to ambush in war. On the other hand , the novel written by Jonathan Shay, Achilles in Vietnam, he agrues that the war was unjust. He gives examples using the stories the returning soldiers from the war told him. With these stories and sotires from the Illiad, he attemtps to explain to the reader that the war was unjust , and that it corrupted the innocent people sent to the battle zone.War is not just something that just happens, rather, it is something that has been festering for a while, and once it reaches the surface it explodes like a volcano. This war began as a peacful assist to the Southern Vietnamese, then once JFK was assasinated the U.S. began to take over all aspects of the war. Is the war just or unjust, maybe both, but with careful analysis of the war, one will get an uprfront and personal view of whether it was just or not.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    War is not a subject one should speak lightly of. It is an important but controversial issue in America, and it has been for years, as it affects the lives of every person living in the country. One person in particular stands against the war he lives to experience the effects of: the Vietnam War. In his speech, “Beyond Vietnam - A Time to Break Silence,” Martin Luther King Jr. presents a persuasive argument against America’s involvement in the Vietnam War through his word choice and anecdotal evidence.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Just War Theory

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages

    What justifies war? Who justifies it? Why as human beings do we feel the need to fight, harm, and kill others to achieve certain goals? These questions have been pertinent to our society since the beginning of time and continue to challenge us to better understand the human psyche, and code of ethics that give Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Coast Guardsmen, and Marines credence to kill in the name of the United States of America. These ethics of war lay the foundation for that code of understanding and righteousness for when it is justifiable to pull the trigger and take the life of another, or commit an act of war.…

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Just War Theory

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Matthew 5-7, Jesus talks, about how, the Pharisees and Pagans, do many simple things wrong, like praying, almsgiving, and just following rules God set out for them. For example, the Pharisees, pray in front of everyone, announcing that they are praying, but that is not how God wants you to pray. You and God, should be the only ones knowing you are praying, if you keep humble, then you will be rewarded. I think, that if you are going to do something to please God, or anyone, they should be the only ones that need to know, and give you their approval. You do not other people’s approval because your actions are not for them, you're actions are targeting toward a person or a group of people, not the people following you in the…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Introduction The notion of war has always been the subject of moral debate throughout history. World War II is no different in this particular regard. In order for wars to be morally justified, the Just War Theory was developed. The Just War Theory has two specific criteria which must be followed in order for the act of war to be considered morally justified – the jus ad bellum (right to go to war) and jus in bello (rightful conduct within war) criterions.…

    • 1967 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Inevitably, life as we knew it in America changed the moment President Franklin D. Roosevelt gave his “Day of Infamy” speech. Although in the beginning the United States had long been divided on the issue of whether the country should stay out of the war, the nation was given no other option but to declare war on Japan, thus officially entering World War II. The country encouraged citizens to fulfill their patriotic duties by enlisting, women joined the workforce, citizen ultimately were urged to conserve resources, and all people were persuaded to buy savings bonds. Throughout the duration of War World II, Allies managed to attain victories with strong leadership, logistical strength, and actions of bravery among the various nations, yet the most influential foundations included both censorship and propaganda. Throughout this essay, I will provide evidence that demonstrates how Michael Adams’ argument that the United States managed to glorify War World II and turn it into a morally just, wonderful war was justified through the use of censorship when regarding the true…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Just War Thousands of years ago, before motor vehicles, before long distance travel, before Christianity itself, scholars and philosophers were debating a question which is still on the forefront of many minds today: Is war ever just? By the 4th century, St. Augustine, also known as Augustine of Hippo, had developed a set of criteria regarding when it was justified to go to war (Patterson). These criteria are still widely used today, although debated by many, especially with the recent use of drones and unmanned vehicles in war. Religious figures also debate this topic, as some regard human life as sacred, with no just opportunity for taking another life, while others regard it as necessary, and still other religions reach an interesting compromise…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Importance Of Just War

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Just wars are very important because one of the main goals is to protect the civilians and their rights. Without Just wars ,our nation’s civilians would be in extreme danger , with wars occurring based on biased reasons like a person or group of people’s ethnicity or religion. Also without Just Wars the nation would not be providing us any form of safety or protection. To prevent this danger,the Just War Doctrine states, many important criteria that our nation has to follow. Without ,these rules in place there would be many unjust wars occurring. Not only are unjust wars a danger to our nation, but they are also a danger to our Nation’s resources such as water. During the wars, soldiers use nukes and other dangerous equipment that emit dangerous…

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just and Unjust Wars

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this paper, I will attempt to argue Michael Walzer’s reasoning that war is not inevitable, and show that freedom of choice does not exists for the parties involved. I will present an argument for the inevitability of war after outlining Walzer’s objections to the realist’s point of view on the morality of war.…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    War Vs Just War

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Just War Tradition is a justification for how and why wars are fought. A just cause is clearly the most important rule setting the tone for everything else.1 The two basic rights for a just cause are the rights of the state and those of individual citizens. International law affirms these rights and further identifies legitimate governments (states) to have rights.2 To be legitimate the state must be recognized as legitimate by its people and by the international community. The state avoids violating rights of other legitimate states and lastly the state makes reasonable effort to meet the needs of their citizens. Conversely the aggressive acts against its people cause the aggressor to forfeit its rights as a legitimate state. Just…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ethics of War

    • 2322 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Human beings have been fighting each other since prehistoric times, and people have been discussing the rights and wrongs of it for almost as long. The Ethics of War starts by assuming that war is a bad thing, and should be avoided if possible, but it recognises that there can be situations when war may be the lesser evil of several bad choices. War is a bad thing because it involves deliberately killing or injuring people, and this is a fundamental wrong - an abuse of the victims’ human rights. (www.bbc.co.uk) The rationale of ethics in war is to help in making a decision on what is right or wrong, both for individual soldier and the countries involved. War ethics also leads to the establishment of formal laws of war (e.g. The Hague and Geneva conventions), the creating and enforcing of rules of engagement for soldiers, and in the punishment of soldiers and others who commit war crimes.…

    • 2322 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays