Preview

The Importance Of Just War

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1433 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Importance Of Just War
Just wars are very important because one of the main goals is to protect the civilians and their rights. Without Just wars ,our nation’s civilians would be in extreme danger , with wars occurring based on biased reasons like a person or group of people’s ethnicity or religion. Also without Just Wars the nation would not be providing us any form of safety or protection. To prevent this danger,the Just War Doctrine states, many important criteria that our nation has to follow. Without ,these rules in place there would be many unjust wars occurring. Not only are unjust wars a danger to our nation, but they are also a danger to our Nation’s resources such as water. During the wars, soldiers use nukes and other dangerous equipment that emit dangerous …show more content…
Just wars are also extremely important because they contribute to the idea that, the nation has a duty to protect the United States citizen's rights and safety. As stated in the Just War Doctrine “A Just War must follow at least one of the pieces of Criteria to be considered Just”. In order to have a Just war, the following criteria must be met both before, during and after the war. Before a war, nations should try to constitute peace, or in other words, only use war as a last resort. Although there may not always be a way to only use warfare as a last resort, nations should not participate in a war unless the nation has a reasonable chance of success. However, during an armed conflict the amount of force used, must be proportional to the damage or force that the other army has used and the overall purpose of the war must be to establish good or correct evil. After the Just War has occurred, nations should try to constitute peace with the other combatants. Although many people have diverse opinions and thoughts about what a just war is, leaders should always protect the safety and rights of the citizens and maintain a solid reason for going to war and continuing a …show more content…
During this battle, Alexander and his army were outnumbered by quite a lot. Although The Persian army was larger, Alexander the Great was the leader with greater insight to the battlefield. He could plan strategic attacks in short amounts of time. Alexander the Great always chose his maneuver based on his opponents dispositions. One of his tactics Alexander used in the Battle of Gaugamela was to strike in the center of the opposing army with his phalanx. At the same time, he used the cavalry to punch holes in the flanks. The Battle of Gaugamela ended on October 1, 331 BC, with the defeat of the Persians by Alexander and his Athenian army and the end of the Persian Empire. In the case of the Battle of Gaugamela, Alexander went up against a much larger force. Alexander the Great knew he and his army was going to win the battle, he fought because he knew he had a high chance of success. Alexander fought and beat the Persian Empire claiming his title as Persian King. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_the_Great) During the battle between Alexander the Great and The Persian Empire, the Persians were a much larger group of soldiers, but just because the Persians were a bigger army did not

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This infuriate Alexander because he wanted to face Darius himself, so he attempts to chase after Darius, but Darius was too long gone for Alexander to even catch up because Alexander would have to get through the rear army. Hence, Alexander was informed that his army was struggling against the Persian wagon and returns to aid his struggling army (Yenne 79). This victory at Gaugamela would mark the start of the reign of Alexander the Great as this victory will shortly after make him King of Persia as this battle would lead him to Persia’s capital, castle Persepolis, Babylonia, and Persian treasury. After Persia had lost at the Battle of Gaugamela, they were never able to recreate an army that was as vast as Gaugamela. In the same year, Alexander and his army continued marching forwards from Persepolis looking for Darius, but Alexander was too late and was never able to fight Darius face to face.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gaugamela was the perfect battlefield for Darius’s army and both leaders knew this. But, Alexander decided to take his chances and try to end the war with this battle on Darius’s land. As the Macedonian army set up camp overnight, Alexander was advised by his right-hand man Parmenion to attack Darius at that moment (Grant). It would have been the perfect surprise attack on the Persian army but, Alexander declined and said a surprise attack would be considered stealing a victory, so he decided to be fair and start the battle when Darius was ready (Grant). That night, Alexander went with some of his scouts to asses Darius’s army.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    EXPOSITION The justification of war — both in terms of jus in bello and jus ad bellum — is a difficult and complex task. This difficulty is increased immensely when trying to apply just war principles to terrorism, a complicated mix of typical and unconventional tactics that can be performed by both established and state governments. In the essay, I will critically address the discussion of terrorism by Michael Walzer in chapter 12 of “Just and Unjust Wars” (1977) and advocate for the justification of revolutionary terrorism. Walzer’s judgment of terrorism oversimplifies and neglects important complexities that must be considered in the ethical analysis of terrorism.…

    • 1768 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A review of chapter 2, 'The Crime of War' in Michael Walzer's book, "Just and Unjust Wars: A moral argument with historical illustrations." Allen Lane 1997.…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stalingrad Just War

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There have been many wars come this day and age. They included much bloodshed and death. One of the bloodiest wars in the history of the world was the Battle of Stalingrad. This war was the turning point for the Allies in their fight against Germany, but with nearly 2 Million Civilian/Military Casualties, was this battle justified? The Just War theory provides a basis as to whether a war was just or evil and this will be applied to the Battle of Stalingrad to perceive whether or not this battle meets with the 3 different Jus in Bello / Jus Ad Bellum criteria necessary to be a just war.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    War is a constant debate of right and wrong. Throughout the ages war had been everlasting battles fought and battles lost. Lives are sacrificed for the cause of men. One of the most well known wars of all time World War II was a constant struggle for world power. On one side of the world the Germans fighting in the east and the Japanese in the west. The end of the war was brought on by new technology and the decision to change the world. People ask if it was necessary to drop the bombs on Japan. Truman made a decision that saved the lives of American Soldiers as well as Japanese soldiers. If it wasn't for the lives saved, the Technology developed and the Decision made the world would not have devolved as fast as it has.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Just war theory maintains that war may be justified if fought only in certain circumstances, and only if certain restrictions are applied to the way in which war is fought. The theory that was first propounded by St Augustine of Hippo and St Ambrose of Milan ( 4th and 5th centuries AD) attempts to clarify two fundamental questions: ‘when is it right to fight?’ and ‘How should war be fought?’. Whereas Pacifists are people mainly Christians who reject the use of violence and the deliberate killing of civilians but claims that peace is intrinsically good and ought to be upheld either as a duty and that war can never be justifiable. However, Realists agree that, due to the nature of humans, force is a necessary action to be used to maintain a just and ordered society. Therefore, since the Second World War, people have turned their attention to Just War again establishing rules that can serve as guidelines to a just war- the Hague and Geneva conventions.…

    • 1943 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Vietnam War Benefits

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages

    An example for going into a war due to involvement by the country, is the French involvement in Vietnam. Due to colonizing Vietnam, the French didn’t want to lose said area; so they went to war. Second, is alliances. Alliances are a strategic reason to become involved in a war, because then when your country needs the help, alliances will have your back. Countries without alliances are at risk for attack or imperialism. The third reason of benefits for a country is a risky justification. Many Americans were dissatisfied with US involvement in the Frist Gulf War due to the hidden reason of wanting to obtain Kuwait’s special oil. However, benefits such as stopping terrorism by being involved in the War on Terror are more than enough. If lives will be saved in the long run by going to war, the war is just. Lastly, a just reason for going to war would be if injustices are happening. The only example needed more this rationale is the countless lives lost when Adolf Hitler decided that those not of his Aryan ideal could be wasted. War is not an end all to problems, but it is at times, the only…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compared to the early 20th century, the wars of today are vastly different. The reasons for fighting, the styles of fighting, and who is fighting are all very different. However, in an age that is far removed from the past, a few things regarding war have remained the unchanged. One of the ideas that has remained unchanged in a time that is every changing, are the rules of war, as described by Michael Walzer in his book, Just and Unjust Wars. Naturally, in a time where so much has changed, there are starting to be a few objections to Walzer’s claims on the rules of war. Even though the wars of today are far different from those of the past, the moral equality of soldiers remains the same regardless if they are associated with being on an unjust…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just War

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As reader leader, I decided to do my summary on “What Is a Just War?” by Jean Bethke Elshtain. Elshtain opens by discussing the main priority of any government: providing security, thus ensuring tranquility. Elshtain makes the point that civic peace and security are the foundations for all the other human rights. For example, for someone to exercise their right of freedom of speech, that person should be able to exercise their right without fear of consequence. A flaw, as Elshtain points out, in the overall tranquility of the ‘kingdom’ is that not everyone is ruled under the same law. Even though guns are allowed in the United States, other places like Australia prohibits them, the different laws between countries can cause tensions. These…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Just War

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “The power to wage war is the power to wage war successfully” (Evans Hughes, Charles). In 1846 the United States and Mexico went to war against each other over disagreements mainly regarding the area of Texas. Mexico claimed the war was to protect its territorial integrity while the United States claimed the war was an act of self defense. In the Just War Theory actions and intentions of warring nations are upheld to a standard of justification. This Theory attempts to provide parameters of acceptable behavior when declaring and waging war. It also provides examples of offenses often committed in war. When examining the events leading up to the war, it becomes clear that the United States was acting in accordance with the principles put forth in the Just War Theory. The participation of the United States in the Mexican-American war was just because war was declared as a last resort, the war was fought on behalf of a just cause, and the war was declared by a legitimate authority.…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This article “Just War Tradition” also refer to as Just War Theory is related to war because it explains the principles and morals behind on taking war as a last resort solution only if the options don't meet the requirements. Also, in the case of war was to happen they discussed on when and where warfare is appropriate to be taken place. Including that, the Just War Tradition was originally discovered by the Christians and their based it on their philosophy. Then theorist Saint Augustine made who made other factions to their philosophy for a better outcome. As years passed another theorist named Michael Walzer stepped in but this time around modernize the principles. The government must apply two principles the first principle is Jus ad Bellum…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just and Unjust Wars

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this paper, I will attempt to argue Michael Walzer’s reasoning that war is not inevitable, and show that freedom of choice does not exists for the parties involved. I will present an argument for the inevitability of war after outlining Walzer’s objections to the realist’s point of view on the morality of war.…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Back in the spring of 2011 Syria began a brutal civil war that crippled the infrastructure leaving 3 main factions fighting for power. The United States decided to intervene and support the Syrian Rebel Army in retaliation for President Bashar al-Assad’s suspected use of chemical weapons against the people of Syria. If this were in fact accurate and America’s only reason for uniting forces with them was to overthrow a tyrannical leader, then I believe America would have been in accordance with the Just War Theory. Yet history shows us that we (Americans) usually have an ulterior motive behind the silver lining. If we look back to the year 2003 and the invasion of Iraq we again see that in the peoples’ eyes there was a just reason for why we were sending our armies. Weapon of Mass…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why War Is Justified?

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages

    George Washington once said: “To be prepared for war is one of the most effective means for preserving peace.” As much of an irony it is, war is needed to safeguard our amity and to ensure that the balance of power will not be disturbed. The idea of war has been received with countless different altercations. In history, we learned that governments have glorified war to recruit young men to join the army by using propaganda. Soldiers who have died for their country were depicted as heroes, fighting for their own freedoms. However, in this modern age the horrors of war come to light, what happens on the battlefield is nothing to be triumphant about. Although war has never been a favorable option, it can be justified. A war is justified if…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays