Preview

Alexander's Tactics After The Battle Of Gaugamela

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
683 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Alexander's Tactics After The Battle Of Gaugamela
Following the Battle of Gaugamela, Alexander planned on deploying the same tactics used against the Persians during the battle in Issus. In reply, his generals disagreed with repeating that tactic as it would put Alexander in danger, it would leave the left and center unit weaken against Persian, and purpose that Alexander take the fight towards Darius together with his army. Alexander opposed to his general’s idea as he was very firmed on his own belief and reassured his generals that if he is able to immediately take out Darius again like at Issus (Yenne 73). The battle would be over as his non-Persian soldiers would have no motives to fight any more if their ruler had abandoned them. Hence, Alexander and his army marched out onto Gaugamela …show more content…
In the meantime while Alexander is occupied luring Darius’s cavalry out, the two forces marched towards each other and started a battle. In the midst of the battle it was without a doubt as how Alexander’s general had predicted; Alexander left and center army would be struggling against the Persians and their wagons that had spears pointing out of the wheels. The purpose of the wagons are counter against the phalanx 18 inch spears by having a heavy wagon ramming through the phalanx and sweep any soldiers caught in the spears sticking out of the rims (Yenne 76). While Alexander’s left and center army was struggling against the Persians wagons, Alexander had finally lured Darius’s cavalry long enough and hit a u-turn going forty-five degrees towards the center of the Persian army, where Darius was located in (Yenne 75). And miraculously for Alexander all goes well for him and Darius fell for Alexander same tactic a second time and was faced with Alexander and his cavalry charging toward him after a successful tactic by them. As Alexander charges straight at Darius the two meets eye in a closer distance than at Issus, Alexander throws a sphere in the direction of Darius only to miss …show more content…
This infuriate Alexander because he wanted to face Darius himself, so he attempts to chase after Darius, but Darius was too long gone for Alexander to even catch up because Alexander would have to get through the rear army. Hence, Alexander was informed that his army was struggling against the Persian wagon and returns to aid his struggling army (Yenne 79). This victory at Gaugamela would mark the start of the reign of Alexander the Great as this victory will shortly after make him King of Persia as this battle would lead him to Persia’s capital, castle Persepolis, Babylonia, and Persian treasury. After Persia had lost at the Battle of Gaugamela, they were never able to recreate an army that was as vast as Gaugamela. In the same year, Alexander and his army continued marching forwards from Persepolis looking for Darius, but Alexander was too late and was never able to fight Darius face to face. At Caspian Gates Darius was left behind on a wagon and assassinated by his own bodyguard because they saw him as incompetent to lead Persia anymore, seeing this Alexander feels sorrow for Darius to be killed by his own men, he gave Darius a royal funeral, by burying him at the capital of persia, Persepolis, along with other previous kings of persia (Yenne

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The pass was about 330 feet in width. Leonities tactics helped him defend the large Persian fleet by creating a battle formation called Phalanx formation in which the men formed a wall of overlapping shields and protruded their spears out from the sides of the shields. This war tactic helped defend the persian attack because since the pass was only 330 feet wide Xerxes couldn't call his army to all attack at once they had to attack in waves so that made it easier for the spartans to hold off the massive persian army. Xerxes attacked greece because Darius originally attacked Greece because the Athenians gave support to the "Ionian Revolt" against Persian rule in Asia Minor. Darius's army was decisively defeated at the Battle of Marathon in the first attempt to invade Greece. After Darius died his son, Xerxes, vowed revenge for his father's defeat at the Battle of…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Herodotus, the Greek army did not have enough troops to maintain the Persians troops so they were heavily outnumbered this lead to the Persians surround the Greek Force. A major factor on the defeat of the defeat of the Greeks was of the disunity of the Greek states.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After crushing the Ionian revolt, king darius I sent…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This is how Alexander’s Empire differed from the others, as he did not have enough people, he allowed the Persians to be part of the new Empire instead of disposing of them. Alexander was the clear example of rapprochement; he married Roxana, a Persian…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Alexander was tempted to chase after Darius, but with his camp being raided and Parmenion surrounded, Alexander ordered his troops back. He then aided to Parmenion and slaughtered the Persians who were coming back from raiding his camp (“Battle of Gaugamela”). With exemplary leading, strategic planning, and patience, Alexander had earned one of the most decisive and stunning victories…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Greek offensive, although contributed to Miltiades as a brilliant strategic decision, is an important historiographical issue for modern historians. Herodotus tells us that opinion among the Athenian commanders was divided with some opposed to attacking with their heavily outnumbered force. Others, especially Miltiades supported an offensive strategy. Miltiades is credited with persuading the war archon Callimachus through a stirring speech to cast his deciding vote in favour of an offensive strategy. Herodotus in his narrative has Miltiades say ‘If we refuse to fight, I have little doubt that the result will be bitter”. However it has also been suggested that the Greek offensive was based on the apparent absence of the Persian cavalry which Herodotus fails to mention. This is puzzling as most modern historians acknowledge that a Persian cavalry force had already disembarked from the fleet onto land and Herodotus said the Persians chose Marathon because it was “the best ground for cavalry to manoeuvre in.”. It has also been assumed that Miltiades deployed the Greek phalanx with strong wings and a weak centre, a strategy that secured…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The writer agrees with Denise that Alexander the Great led his troops to win several battles .However, the writer believes that Alexander the Great was both effective and efficient in this battle by the way he used his strategy and planning against King Darius troops.…

    • 92 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, the Persian Emperor Paries lll, was brightly intelligent and his army outnumbered Alexander’s. By surprise Alexander denied the offer from Emperor to surrender all the Persian Empire west of Euphrates, and proceeded to invade the rest of Persia. Alexander mind was set on one thing only; that was to conquer the entire empire, which was just what he did. Persian grew a massive love for Alexander once the made the attempt to merge the Greek and Persian cultures, but they we’re both holding important positions. By doing so this caused him a lot of hardship once he begins to rule the former Persian Empire. Even though he adopted the Persians ways of governing; while keeping the Greek cultural ways. Alexander looked to create a new-found life with the empire, but not to exclude, but those in Greece started to resent him while the was away in Persia. The attention that Alexander showed the Persians, made those in Greece feel jealous a d the citizens began to…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He was only stopped by his exposed men who forced him to return home. His military expertise can be found in the battle of Issus(333 B.C.E) against the persians. During the battle Alexander had started to lose and he almost lost, but in the chaos the king of the persians ran away and they all started to retreat. This gave Alexander the chance and he took it, And he crushed the persians. One of the strategies he would use was to split up his army into three groups and flank the enemy from almost all sides leaving then nowhere to run. Although he was a great military leader he did have his faults and one of them was he was ruthless. It is recorded that he slaterd all males, and enslaves 20,000 women and children, and also let his troops destroy what was left of thebes after he invaded…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Darius died in 486BC leaving his proclaimed heir a legacy which included his goal to take revenge on Athens’ interference during the Ionian Revolt, to avenge…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander’s strength is also shown in Document Three. In the legend of The Battle of Hydaspes, Alexander saw that he was outnumbered by the elephant cavalry so he came up with an elaborate plan. The plan confused his opponents, and was very tricky on his part. The plan worked in the end, even though they were overpowered. Alexander shows his strength mentally and physically when he made his plan and when he followed through with his plan against an elephant cavalry. Alexander acted the way he wanted his men to act, which was with wits, and strength in every…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander shows more signs of maturity as he travels through Asia into India, where he battles Porus with his fleet of Indian elephants, which Alexander’s horses were not used to. Although the battle between Alexander and Porus was long and hard fought, Alexander comes out victorious. But before that Alexander rides up to the dying Porus and asks what the defeated king wants. He answers that he wants to be treated as a king and Alexander proceeds to give Porus’ kingdom back. Although Alexander showed some sense of mercy all throughout his life, this part…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Well, our opinion is that Alexander the Great is great. He was attacked by the Persian and he successfully defeated them. Alexander moved south along the eastern Mediterranean. Many cities surrender the Alexander the Great. Some of the men that was in the other armies that they were in, transferred to Alexander’s army. In 332 B.C.E Alexander entered the world of egypt, a country that had experienced on and off periods of Persian rule for two centuries. With Mediterranean and Egypt secured, the Persians were deprived of naval bases and Alexander was free to move inland to conquer the eastern half of the Persian Empire. Alexander had sources of 1 million troops to take over states and cities. Darius III on the other hand brought soldiers all over and even beyond his empire. Persian was on a rampage and Alexander continued to battle against them until they…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Document C illustrates how Alexander was able to defeat the Tyre which was a self proclaimed “unconquerable city” because it was built on an island protected with high walls. “ The great city…. Was now utterly destroyed. Her king, Azimilik, and various other notables, including envoys from carthage, had taken refuge in the temple of Melkart, and Alexander spared their lives. The remaining survivors, some 30,000 in numbers, he sold into slavery, Two thousand men of military age were crucified.” (Doc C) Although some might argue he isn't great because the deaths of two thousand military man are quite brutal he did it out of pure leadership in order to finish the battle he started. Alexander stepped up as a leader and was able to lead men into a battle and defeat the unconquerable city. Also In Document C, another battle or march, Alexander shows leadership, “Alexander had ordered that all [expect] those who sought sanctuary were to be slain” (Document C). This shows Alexander was great by leadership because he made the big decision for his troops on what to follow out, even though it was a rough game plan, he stepped up and took charge.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Persian empire at its peak has long been seen as one of the largest wholes during the classical era, and few have rivaled its size. The land that Alexander the Great was able to conquer, however, was one of the few that served as an appropriate challenge. Around the time of 338 B.C.E through 323 B.C.E., Alexander's collected mass was a whole. Of a Greek origin, Alexander was taught by Aristotle, the great philosopher, and it can be inferred that he used the strategic methods learned, among other things, to assist him during his expansion. It was short lived, however, when he died of an unknown cause at an early age of thirty-three. Even though his empire crumbled, his legacy lived on. Multiple cities, strongly influenced by Alexander, erected,…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays