Preview

Ethics of War

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2322 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ethics of War
The Ethics of Modern Warfare Human beings have been fighting each other since prehistoric times, and people have been discussing the rights and wrongs of it for almost as long. The Ethics of War starts by assuming that war is a bad thing, and should be avoided if possible, but it recognises that there can be situations when war may be the lesser evil of several bad choices. War is a bad thing because it involves deliberately killing or injuring people, and this is a fundamental wrong - an abuse of the victims’ human rights. (www.bbc.co.uk) The rationale of ethics in war is to help in making a decision on what is right or wrong, both for individual soldier and the countries involved. War ethics also leads to the establishment of formal laws of war (e.g. The Hague and Geneva conventions), the creating and enforcing of rules of engagement for soldiers, and in the punishment of soldiers and others who commit war crimes. Currently, the world has seen a quick increase in wars across the world. What was meant to be the first century not scarred by war, quickly turned into a bloodbath in the wake of terrorist attacks in the United States and in Europe. In response to these attacks on civilian populations the United States engaged in two pre-emptive wars on those who harboured terrorists. These wars have now been ongoing for seven years and recently the number of American and other Coalition soldiers fallen on the battlefield has risen to over 4000, and the number of Iraqi civilian casualties has risen to 1,421,933. (Griffis). Recent issues that surround and greatly manipulate the world we live in makes us ask the question. How can these deaths and wars be necessary? The answer to this question is that, even though war is an indisputable evil, there are worse things on this planet than death, and in times of great adversity man has the moral responsibility to use force in the hope of greater good for humanity. The Ethics of War starts by assuming that war is


Cited: Barrows, The Hon. T.J. nytimes.com. 16 november 2010 <http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=F70E14F7355D11738DDDA90994DF405B8885F0D3>. global securtiy . 16 11 2010 <http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/war/iran-iraq.htm>. Griffis, Margaret. Antiwar . 16 november 2010 <antiwar.com/casualties>. www.bbc.co.uk. 16 november 2010 <http://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/war/overview/introduction.shtml>. The Ethics of Modern Warfare Rafael Berrios 11/23/10 Phil 330 Mr. Dolan

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    From the Trojan horse to the Atomic Bomb, strategies and motivations during warfare have come under close scrutiny from historians and observers alike. The British strategy of “area bombing” during the Second World War is one of such controversies with differing viewpoints. Historians such as Denis Richards, author of The Hardest Victory, take the stance that “area bombing” was a necessary strategy to help the war effort while other historians such as Max Hastings, author of Bomber Command, see this strategy as an atrocity toward humanity. In war, the overall motivation of a strategy must be taken into consideration when determining whether or not an ethical boundary has been crossed. Did the British cross a moral boundary in their bombing campaigns between…

    • 3682 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of military ethics, a person should have the choice to kill in order to defend their country. People should look to see this is justifiable, “Consider the situation…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The idea of war brings up many questions about life and death, suffering, and consequences. While many people may see war as something that affects people as a whole, such as nations or a persecuted group, war further impacts every individual, whether or not they are directly involved. War limits freedoms and individualism, and in most cases people find themselves with less rights than during peacetime. People base their choices not on what they feel, and more on what they have to do to survive. Soldiers and civilians alike are influenced by war in different ways, however, these tie together when the overall effects of war are examined.…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    This juggernaut of war has crushed millions of humankind. Its savagery and decadence is consummate. Such butchery has patently marked all the wars of this century and before. This cannibalization of mankind on its own is unparalleled. Scenes of human massacre that few persons would believe will be imprinted perpetually in the minds of the combatants. Many of those who experience the immoral, offensive and degrading trauma of war can be physically and psychologically scared indefinitely. Their sense of what is right and wrong is in constant conflict. The tragedy of war and incomprehensible death will change whoever you thought you were and whatever you think you will become when you encounter…

    • 3663 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compared to the early 20th century, the wars of today are vastly different. The reasons for fighting, the styles of fighting, and who is fighting are all very different. However, in an age that is far removed from the past, a few things regarding war have remained the unchanged. One of the ideas that has remained unchanged in a time that is every changing, are the rules of war, as described by Michael Walzer in his book, Just and Unjust Wars. Naturally, in a time where so much has changed, there are starting to be a few objections to Walzer’s claims on the rules of war. Even though the wars of today are far different from those of the past, the moral equality of soldiers remains the same regardless if they are associated with being on an unjust…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To conclude, there is no doubt that the conflict of war is a useless encounter that affects many innocent people’s lives, the economic stability and physiological wellbeing of soldiers. It is evident that in some circumstances society makes war to ensure peace, and on the surface this seems rational, even plausible. However, in reality throughout the journey there is a great human and economic cost…

    • 66 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Decision to Invade Iraq

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages

    To effectively combat irrational, hostile nations or terrorist organizations we need to understand that following international law regarding warfare will only make for a drawn out conflict with a much higher casualty rate. We need to be able to adjust to the particulars of the situation without having our hands tied by international law that only we are expected to adhere to. Rules and laws only work in warfare when all involved parties adhere to them. Those days are over. To be clear, my position is not that we abandon morality and ethics, however we must empower ourselves to be able to effectively combat irrational, hostile enemies.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The War in Iraq has sparked an abundance of criticism since its start in March of 2003. Now, four year later, the criticism has only intensified. The fact of the matter is that upon invasion of Iraq four years ago, the reasons were justifiable based on the evidence at hand. Our American troops, some 3,386 of our armed service members have given their lives for a cause that they felt was just, according to an Associated Press count that was conducted on Friday, May 11, 2007 (Associated Press, 2007). The devastating number is a cruel reminder as to how dangerous a war can be in general, but even more so when guerrilla warfare is present.…

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Just War Pacifism

    • 2476 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Human beings have been fighting with each other since prehistoric times, and people have been discussing the rights and wrongs of it. The Ethics of War begins by assuming that war is a bad thing, and should be avoided if possible, but there can be situations when war may be catastrophic. War is a bad thing because it involves deliberately killing or injuring people, and this is a fundamental wrong. The purpose of war ethics is to help decide what is right or wrong, both for individuals and countries, and to contribute to debates on public policy, and ultimately to government and individual action.…

    • 2476 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Afghanistan War Ethics

    • 2052 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Are wars even supposed to have ethics? War ethics are important because a lot of people don 't even know they exist or if people even follow them. Civilized nations established the Humanitarian law; it is a law regarding how to confront enemies in a semi civilized way and mandates the treatment of prisoners of war (Masci 1013). This law is what raises a lot of hairs on religious leaders and causes anger since they feel that this law is not abided by. It seems that religion and war always tends to go along with war. Whether the wars are started by religions or its religious leaders having problems with how the wars are being fought. The law also states how prisoners are to be tried in the judicial system and if they are to have their trial in civilian or military courts. The main purpose of this law was an effort to control violence or even stop it. Another big factor of having this law the requirement it puts on governments to assess situations before they even start a war to make sure there is an imminent threat. On the down side, a lot of government officials feel that this law weakens the U. S. because of the peacekeeping could create backfires and end in war anyway. War ethics do exist and there will always be people who believe they are not followed. The people who follow or don 't follow these ethics will always stand out in one way or…

    • 2052 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    War is never an easy discussion; it is a subject people constantly debate, especially in regards to total war. Questioning the morality of total war is an issue due to the elasticity of the definition, which is dependent upon the individual. General William T. Sherman’s total war strategy in Georgia and the Carolinas is arguably morally acceptable -even though it included waging war against the civilian population- when taking into account the benefits versus the costs. There were excessive actions taken by Sherman’s soldiers, which stemmed from their prejudices towards the southern population. However, as a result of Sherman’s plan the war ended in a swift victory for the North. The justification and by association the morality of total war…

    • 1463 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    These soldiers aren’t the only deaths from war but also foreign civilians who aren’t part of the war, for example civilians. Anup Shah a well experienced author on multiple articles focusing global issues says that, “Over 6,000 United States soldiers killed in wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Possibly 100 times that number of civilians in those countries. In Iraq, at an early point, there was an estimated range of 400,000 to 900,000 civilian deaths” (Shah 1). These deaths are unethical due to the fact that they have no reason to be killed. Again published by Jeff McMahan an oxford graduate he says that, “soldiers lacking a just cause should no longer be understood to have any moral right to kill soldiers that possess a just cause. This is because soldiers lacking a just cause also lack a right to harm.” (McMahan, 1). so these civilians have no reason to kill, but they are still being killed by foreign action like america's intervening actions. Jeff McMahan a oxford graduate and cambridge university graduate that has written 6 books over the ethics of war believes that noncombatants who are not involved in war aren’t a real threat, “enemy combatants are in general legitimate targets for just combatants but that enemy noncombatants are not.” (McMahan 26). This attack onto innocent foreign civilians has been used as support against the United States for encouraging people to…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse- Pestilence, War, Famine, and Death- rode together during the 20th century to bring war, disease, and starvation to the world. It is estimated that around 88 million people perished as a result of the two world wars, with over half of the dead of WWII being civilians. The war machine residing over the world was anything but humane. It is interesting then that just a few decades later there is growing debate about how war can be made humane, with many proponents of the idea that it has already become more humane. This essay will first raise the question of what it means to be humane and will give a general definition of war, because the definitions you take of those terms can greatly affect your answer. It will assess popular arguments about humane warfare, including the increased value of human life and new technology, which have been said to have made war more humane. It will conclude, however, that although countries of the West may have adopted such characteristics, this is essentially asymmetrical because adversaries of the West do not tend to play by the same rules. Therefore, although war can be made more humane, it is not easy to say to what extent that will happen.…

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    I’m sure most, if not all of you, are all familiar with the recently ended Iraq War. Well how would you like to hear that this 8 year long war was not even justified? According to the just war theory the well-known Iraq War is considered not a just war. Why you may ask? Well the just war theory has many different criteria and regulations that have to be met in order to consider a war just. Focusing in on a few of those criteria has determined that it is indeed not a just war. Some of those criteria include having no just cause. When a war is waged due to reasons or causes that are viewed as wrong, it causes the war to be unjust. Another aspect is having the right intention. When a war is waged on an intention that is unethical or wrong, it is considered unjust. Lastly, it talks about the aspect of a war having to be a last resort. This talks about how a war should only be created when there is no other way possible to resolve an issue at hand. When this is not met it causes the war to also be unjust. Statistics show that due to these issues not being able to be met it classifies the Iraq War as an unjust war.…

    • 1872 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    War Can Be Avoided

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages

    War supports death. Many wars could have been prevented if world leaders took the time to communicate and negotiate other options. war is negativity, violence and death of innocent people every time. Looking back in though history, nearly every war recorded has a beginning caused by corruption and lack of information. The golden rule “treat others the way you would like to be treated”. If we work towards non violent solutions, death in war can be avoided. Communication and less judgment toward others is critical to saving lives…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics