Preview

Essay On Just War Theory

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1083 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Essay On Just War Theory
Section A
In Matthew 5-7, Jesus talks, about how, the Pharisees and Pagans, do many simple things wrong, like praying, almsgiving, and just following rules God set out for them. For example, the Pharisees, pray in front of everyone, announcing that they are praying, but that is not how God wants you to pray. You and God, should be the only ones knowing you are praying, if you keep humble, then you will be rewarded. I think, that if you are going to do something to please God, or anyone, they should be the only ones that need to know, and give you their approval. You do not other people’s approval because your actions are not for them, you're actions are targeting toward a person or a group of people, not the people following you in the
…show more content…
The first one is,”the damage inflicted by the aggressor on the nation or community of nations must be lasting, grave, and certain”. This means that the damage by the attacker, which could be a country or a group of people, has to have a lasting and drastic effect on a country or a group of people. The second one is,”all other means of putting an end to it must have been shown to be impractical or ineffective”. This is saying, that war is last resort, all safety precautions and tactics have been used and all ways to stop or prevent to war have been used, but have failed. The third is,”there must be serious prospects of success”. This is saying that, you must have a legitimate chance to, win the war, defend yourself and people, stop the aggressor, and succeed in getting rid of the aggressor. The final one is,”the use of arms must not produce evils and disorders graver than the evil to be eliminated”. This means that when you attack or defend to stop the war, you must not use anything worst that the aggressor did to you. It must be less or equal. If the aggressor killed ten people, then you cannot kill any more than

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The Sanitary Commission was a known profit organization that was sanctioned by the U.S. government in 1861 to help provide supplies and aid to the medical corps. It was not the first organization of its kind but it was the first to have a major and lasting effect on the army. The Sanitary Commission aided soldiers, supplied hospitals with the necessary supplies and provided an efficient means for smaller local aid societies to distribute their supplies. They also created many of the guidelines that helped to shape todays modern medical care and began the project of organizing and recording patients’ needs and recovery times. However, such a large organization that was maintained primarily by volunteers couldn’t buy all the supplies it needed by itself. They of course had the help of those other smaller aid societies scattered across the north and mid-west but they could only supply so much. The Commission needed a way to help encourage more people to give. Especially during the more trying and difficult times of the war when morale was lowest among citizens. So they created what they called Sanitary Fair’s to help raise money to pay for medical supplies, transportation and other essential materials that they would use in both battlefield and camp hospitals.…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    EXPOSITION The justification of war — both in terms of jus in bello and jus ad bellum — is a difficult and complex task. This difficulty is increased immensely when trying to apply just war principles to terrorism, a complicated mix of typical and unconventional tactics that can be performed by both established and state governments. In the essay, I will critically address the discussion of terrorism by Michael Walzer in chapter 12 of “Just and Unjust Wars” (1977) and advocate for the justification of revolutionary terrorism. Walzer’s judgment of terrorism oversimplifies and neglects important complexities that must be considered in the ethical analysis of terrorism.…

    • 1768 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Clausewitz's Theory Of War

    • 1853 Words
    • 8 Pages

    While many scholars attempted to theorize war in human history, only few were credited for constructing consistent theories on which people could base and further their understanding of war and warfare. Those include Greek Thucydides, Chinese Sun Tzu, and Indian Kautilya all three from 3-4th century BC; Prussian Carl von Clausewitz and Swiss Antoine-Henry Jomini both from 19th century. All of those prominent theorist had a lot to offer and therefore had great influence on our thinking in war, warfare, and strategy. However, Clausewitz’s theory offers more insight if one carefully and purposely studied the “paradoxical trinity” identified in his…

    • 1853 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bdq Essay

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In its last analysis the proposition is force to destroy force, conflict to prevent conflict, militarism to destroy militarism, war to prevent war. In its last analysis it must be that if it has any sanction behind its judgment at all. There is where the difficulty lies. . . .…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this chapter, Walzer discusses the cruelty of war and whether there can be any justification for such cruelty. He begins by distinguishing between the justice of war (jus ad bellum) and the justice in war (jus in bello). "War is always judged twice, first with reference to the reasons states have for fighting, secondly with reference to the means they adopt." (p.21).…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Just cause: In my opinion, the United States had no right to go into Iraq based solely on a theory that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. According to the Just War Theory, war is permissible only to confront “a real and certain danger," to protect innocent life, to preserve conditions necessary for decent human existence and to secure basic human rights.…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Success: Military force must have a reasonable chance of success. Lives may not be sacrificed in futile causes.…

    • 2398 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compared to the early 20th century, the wars of today are vastly different. The reasons for fighting, the styles of fighting, and who is fighting are all very different. However, in an age that is far removed from the past, a few things regarding war have remained the unchanged. One of the ideas that has remained unchanged in a time that is every changing, are the rules of war, as described by Michael Walzer in his book, Just and Unjust Wars. Naturally, in a time where so much has changed, there are starting to be a few objections to Walzer’s claims on the rules of war. Even though the wars of today are far different from those of the past, the moral equality of soldiers remains the same regardless if they are associated with being on an unjust…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    task of making sounds, including an alien ship opening, sound authentic. They came up with very good sound effects, like putting a jar in the toilet and opening and closing the lid.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just War

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Force should be used when there are legitimate reasons for using it, and when it is the last resort for the government, who is responsible for civic peace. Elshtain uses Augustine to discuss justice and war. A paradox between war and peace is introduced, Elshtain uses an Augustine quote to discuss the similarity of two words that are complete polar opposites, “Peace and war had a contest in cruelty, and peace won the prize.” In history, there are many instances where evil and horrible things are done in the name of ‘peace’. Elshtain continues with the early Christian beliefs that under Jesus’ teaches forbid force in anyway, even under authority. Later, it transforms to the necessity of force to protect others. This leads to the four qualifications that Elshtain wrote to justify a war, the first is that the war must be publicly declared by a legitimate jurisdiction. The second criteria is that an unjust violence must have occurred against the government’s own people or a defenseless group. Third, the war has to be start with the proper motives. Finally, all other alternatives must be exhausted before leading to war. In the end, Elshtain includes a final criteria that must be met for a war to be ‘just’, the possibility of actually winning the conflict. If there is no chance of succeeding, the conflict should not be…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    By focusing on the positive things in life and persevering through his challenges Cecil Mahoney made it through the war. War is never a good thing because it always leads to many people dying. It may force a decision to be made with whatever caused the war, but this does not make up for the lost lives of others. Although war is a horrible thing and should be avoided at all cost everyone should be proud of the brave men and women who fought for the country. It takes a very courageous person to decide to fight in a war and they deserve to be respected. Cecil Mahoney needed to overcome adversities, just like Sisyphus did, in order to protect the United States. Without heroes like him the world we live in today would be very…

    • 137 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Just War

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “The power to wage war is the power to wage war successfully” (Evans Hughes, Charles). In 1846 the United States and Mexico went to war against each other over disagreements mainly regarding the area of Texas. Mexico claimed the war was to protect its territorial integrity while the United States claimed the war was an act of self defense. In the Just War Theory actions and intentions of warring nations are upheld to a standard of justification. This Theory attempts to provide parameters of acceptable behavior when declaring and waging war. It also provides examples of offenses often committed in war. When examining the events leading up to the war, it becomes clear that the United States was acting in accordance with the principles put forth in the Just War Theory. The participation of the United States in the Mexican-American war was just because war was declared as a last resort, the war was fought on behalf of a just cause, and the war was declared by a legitimate authority.…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This article “Just War Tradition” also refer to as Just War Theory is related to war because it explains the principles and morals behind on taking war as a last resort solution only if the options don't meet the requirements. Also, in the case of war was to happen they discussed on when and where warfare is appropriate to be taken place. Including that, the Just War Tradition was originally discovered by the Christians and their based it on their philosophy. Then theorist Saint Augustine made who made other factions to their philosophy for a better outcome. As years passed another theorist named Michael Walzer stepped in but this time around modernize the principles. The government must apply two principles the first principle is Jus ad Bellum…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The thesis in the article ‘The origins of the World War', by Sidney B. Fay, can clearly be stated as the explanation for World War I. Fay states that no one country is responsible for the creation of the war. Furthermore, he goes on to explain that each of the European country's leaders did, or failed to do ‘certain' things to provoke the other countries into a war. Fay states, "One must abandon the dictum of the Versailles Treaty that Germany and her allies were solely responsible. It was a dictum exacted by victors from vanquished, under the influence of the blindness, ignorance, hatred, and the propagandist misconceptions to which war had given rise." (Fay, The Origins of the World War). His main arguments are his explanations of how each country was responsible for the creation of the war. His first explanation is that of how Serbia was partly responsible. Fay explains that Serbia knew that by not co-operating with the Austrian government over the implications of the Archduke Francis Ferdinand assassination they were indirectly preparing for a war they would fight but did not want. Fay says that Austria was more responsible for the war than any other power but not in military attack, but more in the form of self-defence. He makes it clear that Austria was justified in their battle and that they didn't have to, "sit back and await the dismemberment at the hands of its neighbors." (Fay, The origins of the World War). Fay believes that Berchtold wanted a local war with Serbia but knew and was content with the fact that the rest of Europe could very easily become involved with the war. Fay's third country's explanation was that of Germany. He believed that Germany did not want a war and tried to avert one completely. It is his belief that since Austria was Germany's only dependable ally, they were dragged into the war. Furthermore, he explains that Germany's geographical location, being in the middle of the conflict between France and Russia, they had…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Tae Guk Gi (The Brotherhood of War) was a movie directed by Kang Je-Kyu. It is a movie that shows the lives of two brothers who are forced to fight in the Korean War- Lee Jin-tae and Lee Jin-seok. Lee Jin-tae vows to protect his younger brother from the war. He believes he can send Jin-seok back if he wins the Medal of Honor. So he tries everything he can to win it, even if that means that he has to do bad things to achieve it. Jin-seok becomes upset that his brother will not let him fight. He also resents Jin-tae for the crimes he had committed. The brothers in the movie represent the changing relationship between North and South Koreans during the Korean War.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays