Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Jefferson and Madison Presidencies

Good Essays
831 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Jefferson and Madison Presidencies
During the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison (1801-1817), a dual political party government was starting to form. In the Constitution, which was made in 1787, it is portrayed Jeffersonian Republicans as strict constructionists and Federalists as broad ones. It is true that the Democratic-Republicans believed in the strict construction of the constitution and a weaker federal government, thinking that if there were high concentration of central government, it would lead to a loss of individual and state rights. Madison and Jefferson were two members of this political party, with Jefferson being known as the founder and leader of it. The Federalists, on the other hand, believed that a stronger central government was needed and the Articles of Confederation were too weak. The Democratic-Republican Party (also known as Anti-Federalists) began because of groups that opposed Alexander Hamilton’s fiscal policies. These groups were organized into a party in the mid-1790s by Jefferson and Madison, but it wasn’t until 1800 though that they had a breakthrough and began taking control of the Presidency and Congress. Meanwhile, the Federalist Party was on a slow decline because of Hamilton and Adams not being there anymore and was eventually destroyed as a political force after the Hartford Convention (1814-1815). The meeting was held to discuss several constitutional amendments needed to protect New England’s interests (Document E). This left a short break from political debates and competition, known as the “Era of Good Feeling”.
The Federalist Party was made in the first Washington administration to support the fiscal policies of Hamilton and came to support a strong national government, loose constitution, and a more industrial, less agricultural economy. John Adams and Alexander Hamilton were among its leaders. They were doing well until the Democratic-Republicans took over Congress and the Presidency in the “Revolution of 1800”. After that, they continued to decline and died off at the end of the War of 1812.
From 1801-1809, Thomas Jefferson ran the presidency as a strict constitutionalist who reminded the people that the majority couldn’t have all of the power, but the minority needed to be tended to also. He was a great advocate of equality and liberty and knew that people had their own rights, such as the right to having your own religious preference and being able to follow it without the government choosing it for you (Document B). Jefferson also kept in mind that as times would change, so would the government and its needs. As he write in 1816: “I know…. that laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind” (Document G). This was a very mature thing for him to remember at that time, to not only think about the present but also to make room for future changes.
While Jefferson did help to found the Republican-Democratic party, many of the decisions he made in office favored a strong central government and strong executive power, which seems to be a clear characteristic of the Federalist Party. However, he also cut back the government’s size and reduced its expenses.
While James Madison was president from 1809-1817, he was well known for his abilities in foreign affairs during a time when Britain and France were on the brink of war with us. He also made sure that the government would use power fairly and not inflict it or problems on the people as a burden. During a proposed tariff in 1816, it was reminded that “power was given to Congress to regulate commerce and equalize tariffs on the whole of the United States” and that “it is unjust to aggravate the burdens of the people for the purpose of favoring the manufacturers” (Document F). Madison also managed to keep in mind that nothing drastic should be done unless approved, such in the case of a network for transportation. As Madison said to Congress concerning an Internal Improvements Bill: “such a power is not expressly given by the Constitution and believing that it can not be deduced from any part of it without an inadmissible latitude of construction…I have no opinion but to withhold my signature from it” (Document H).
Jefferson and Madison were accomplished men during their presidencies that also understood that collaboration could be helpful. They worked together and focused on national issues that highlighted their philosophies and published these as letters known as The Adams-Jefferson Letters. The first formation of political parties was in process and they ran the early Democratic-Republican Party well. The parties started out opposite of each other with the Democratic Republicans wanting an agriculture-based economy and a loose government, as to allow for the central government to not take away from personal and state rights; and as the Federalists, who mostly lived in New England and wanted a strict, tight government, but died out after the leaders left, the Hartford Convention, and the War of 1812.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In 1789, a passionate disagreement broke out between Jefferson and Hamilton over the French Revolution. Jefferson and his Republican supporters were in favor of joining the revolutionaries, while Hamilton and the Federalists called for a neutral stance in relation to the fighting. This lead to the bisection of a previously cooperative government into two warring parties.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the beginning of the country's political growth, the United States was divided into two basic political parties known as the Federalists and the Jeffersonian Republicans. While Jefferson and Madison's presidencies were opposed by the Federalists, some of their contributions supported the Federalist Party's beliefs.. While Jefferson and Madison's decisions in office were mainly based of off a strict construction of the constitution, some decisions came from a loose construction. These loose construction decisions can be seen in the Louisiana Purchase and Jefferson and Madison's support of the national bank.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federalist party was an American political party from 1792 to 1816. The Democratic-Republican party was founded in 1792 by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. The Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans viewed society differently. Being they viewed society in a way to help people individually or help them as a whole. Both political groups viewed many key issues differently that played a role in 1792 to 1816. The Democratic-Republicans and Federalist were facing economic issues, government power and foreign affairs. However, the Democratic-Republicans’ idea was more agreeable than the Federalists being they believed in a more prosperous republic by helping those in need than helping one group of people. People living during those times did not like the living…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With respect to the federal Constitution, the Democratic-Republicans were usually characterized as strict constructionists who were opposed to the broad constructionism of the Federalists. As history dictates, this is substantially accurate. In the time frame of 1801-1817, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, the Republican presidents of the time, demonstrated the differences of the Republican Party in several aspects involving the interpretation of the Constitution. The Democratic-Republicans believed that the government should follow a strict interpretation of the Constitution and held the idea that this would allow honest representation of the people and prevent government corruption. However, the Federalists were firm believers in the production of a strong central government and a broad interpretation of the Constitution.…

    • 1140 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By 1817 the great American experiment was in full swing. America was developing into an effective democratic nation. However as the democracy continued to grow, two opposing political parties developed, the Jeffersonian Republicans and the Federalists. The Jeffersonian Republicans believed in strong state governments, a weak central government, and a strict interpretation of the Constitution. The Federalists saw it differently. They opted for a powerful central government with weaker state governments, and a loose interpretation of the Constitution. The seemingly solid divide between Federalist and Republican would begin to blur during the presidencies of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. For, neither Republican president was able lead the nation with purely republican ideals.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Constitution

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The 1790's became known as the Federalist Era because a Federalist President led it. Political parties began to form around two leaders, Hamilton and Jefferson. The Federalist Party supported Hamilton and his financial program. The opposing party that was known as the Democratic-Republican Party supported Jefferson and tried to elect candidates in different states who opposed Hamilton's program. The French Revolution later hardened the formation of these two parties. Americans became sharply divided over whether it should or should not support France.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Revolutionary- Federalist Era, politics, parties, programs, policies, and people made an enormous difference in how the new nation should be structured and run. During this era, two men in particular championed politics and their respective parties. These two men were Alexander Hamilton, a Federalist, and Thomas Jefferson, a Democratic-Republican. Both Hamilton and Jefferson were successful college educated intellectuals and politicians who made significant contributions to the development of the United States policies and programs. However Hamilton, despite never being elected President, had more influence over the development of the United States’ policies and programs during the Revolutionary-Federalist Era. Historically Hamilton and Jefferson are known for agreeing to disagree over just about every policy being discussed during the establishment of government structure, and decorum. And it is Hamilton’s policies on economics, government structure, and constitution interpretation, which took precedent over Jefferson’s.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. The Democratic-Republicans – Led by Jefferson and Madison, believed the individual state should have more power and the federal government should have less.…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the early years of our nation, there was not a great deal of brotherly love, peace and agreement that could be found in the government. Two political parties had evolved that possessed interests that spanned both ends of every argument and political idea. The Federalists believed that the nation should have a very centralized government and stood firm that this would bring about the most order and prosperity. To the contrary, Republicans wanted the rights to stay with the people and States and therefore felt that the federal government should have little control to protect the rights of the people. Many historical documents record the struggles between the two parties. The main struggles revolved around three areas. The first area…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the 1700’s, the first political parties formed over disagreements in the government. The two parties were the federalists and Antifederalists. Federalists made up the people who felt that the stronger government was better for the country and supported the Constitution. The federalists had felt as if different “fiscal and monetary policies” were a weakness for the national economy. Also, the federalists supported banking("Anti-Federalist vs Federalist"). Federalists wanted to fight for stronger governments, managing the country’s debt and ratification. Antifederalists were people who opposed the Constitution of 1788 and disagreed with a stronger federal government. The Antifederalists wanted to keep the power to be for states and local…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first political party system includes the Federalists v. Democratic Republicans. The Federalists, led by John Adams and Alexander Hamilton, believed in a strong national government. They wanted to create a Constitution. They argued that government power should be used to promote economic development through a national bank. Democratic-Republicans, were led by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. They supported a weaker national government. They feared that federal involvement in the economy would benefit only a few wealthy northeasterners, and they thought that agriculture should still be the country's economic source. The second party system which included the Democrats v. Whigs differs from the first political party. Whigs, led by…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the time period of 1801 to 1817, there were multiple issues in the United States ranging from wars to political boundaries. This time period saw the termination of the Federalist party. The conflicts were between two parties called the Jeffersonian Republicans and the Federalists. The Federalist party was officially started by John Adams. John Adams was also a loose constructionist just like all the other Federalists. Federalists were in favor of a strong central government. On the other side, was Thomas Jefferson who was in office from 1801 to 1809. Jefferson started the Jeffersonian Republican party. The Jeffersonians were strict constructionists who believed in states rights. They said that anything that is not stated in the Constitution, is reserved for the states to decide. However, this was not always the case. The statement that the Jeffersonian Republicans are usually characterized as strict constructionists who were opposed to the broad constructionism of the Federalists is partly accurate during the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison. While any party is in office, that party will almost always be loose constructionists because each party in office wants more power. The Jeffersonians started out as strict constructionists but slowly turned into loose constructionists because they were in office for twenty years.…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The origins of the Federalist and Democratic-Republican parties can be traced back to the early 1790s. Initially, the Federalists, or broad constructionists, favored the growth of federal power and a strong central government. The Federalists promulgated a loose interpretation of the Constitution, which meant that they believed that the government could do anything by the implied powers of the Constitution or that congress had the right to interpret the Constitution based on connotation. On the contrary, the Democratic-Republicans favored the protection of states’ rights and the strict containment of federal power. The Democratic-Republicans were strict constructionists and they believed only in the enumerated powers of the Constitution. Up until 1800, these descriptions of the two political parties were very accurate. However during the period of 1801-1817, the Jefferson and Madison’s presidencies reveal that these characterizations were accurate only to a certain extent. These characterizations became inaccurate when Jefferson, Madison, and Monroe stepped up in power as president and were forced to compromise their political views for the benefit of the country in the face of war, economic pressure, and threats to the Union.…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1998 Dbq Essay

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Following the making of the Constitution, James Madison brought forth the warning of political factions or parties as we know today in one of his many inputs into the Federalist Papers. As the Constitution was offered among the states to be ratified, two groups rose in effect of differing opinions on the document, and these two groups were known as the supporters, Federalists, and the opposition, Antifederalists. After eventual political compromise and the beginning of a new government, these parties did not disappear, yet instead became much stronger. In one corner stood the Federalists who believed in broad constructionism of the Constitution and used it to enlarge the size of the national government and its’ powers. In the other corner stood the Antifederalists who soon became the Democratic-Republicans, and in opposition to the Federalist believed in a strict constructionism of the Constitution and often supporting the power of the state and its’ independence.…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Warns against the party system. “It serves to distract the Public Councils, and enfeeble the Public Administration… agitates the Community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms; kindles the animosity of one… against another… it opens the door to foreign influence and corruption… thus the policy and the will of one country are subjected to the policy and will of another.” Washington saw a potentially harmful political factionalism in the country. He insisted Americans to unite for the good of the country. Two political parties had developed in the early 1790s, the Federalist and the Republicans (later known as Democratic-Republicans). The Federalists, and Washington himself, backed up Hamilton’s plan for a central bank and other strong central economic plans based on manufacturing. The Republicans went against the Hamilton’s plan and favored farmers as opposed to city people. Washington predicted that this political division would play significantly in the new government, as these two developing parties attempted to guide the nation and shape it to match with their thought. In today’s society, we have two different parties: Democrats and Republicans. Democrats are more liberal. They believe in a…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays