Preview

How Did Jefferson And Madison Support The Federalists?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
439 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Jefferson And Madison Support The Federalists?
Throughout the beginning of the country's political growth, the United States was divided into two basic political parties known as the Federalists and the Jeffersonian Republicans. While Jefferson and Madison's presidencies were opposed by the Federalists, some of their contributions supported the Federalist Party's beliefs.. While Jefferson and Madison's decisions in office were mainly based of off a strict construction of the constitution, some decisions came from a loose construction. These loose construction decisions can be seen in the Louisiana Purchase and Jefferson and Madison's support of the national bank. Jefferson's decision to buy the Louisiana Purchase is seen as a loose construction conclusion. Since the constitution does not state that the president can buy foreign land, Jefferson was not following the constitution when he made this decision. Jefferson submitted the agreement with France to the senate and after the republican majority ratified the purchase, the Louisiana territory was officially the United States. Jefferson's decision to buy the Louisiana Purchase benefitted the United States …show more content…

Although Jefferson and Madison felt that the national bank was unconstitutional, they fully supported it. Jefferson felt that supporting the national bank would avoid a political war between parties. He also believed that destroying all of the Federalists ideas would upset them and cause the country to divide into the political parties. Madison carried over Jefferson's beliefs to keep peace and continue what Jefferson began, although the bank was considered unconstitutional. Madison and Jefferson were both viewed by the Federalists as hypocrites because of their fickle loose or tight construction beliefs of the constitution. Although Jefferson and Madison both went against their political parties, they were doing it to benefit the country as a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Alexander Hamilton’s plan for a National Bank created controversy in our country. The argument was whether it was “constitutional”. Despite warnings from George Washington two political parties were created. Hamilton led the federalists and Jefferson led the Democratic-Republicans. After the War of 1812 our country entered an Era of Good Feelings in which there was only one political party, the Democratic-Republicans.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the presidencies of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, the two political parties were still somewhat true to their founding ideas, but not completely. The different parties had started to let go of their strong stances and instead begin to take a more, middle of the road viewpoint. The Jeffersonians began to sway from their strict constructionism partly, as they passed things like the 1st Bank of the United States, which went against almost everything the Jeffersonians were for and allowed the government to read-into the constitution. As the Jeffersonians started letting go of their ideals, so did the Federalists.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    By the treaty we acquire territory; therefore, the treaty is unconstitutional.” (Doc A) however, ironically, the federalists were known for having a loose interpretation of the constitution, and, instead, Jefferson was the one who had a hard time with the strict interpretation of the constitution on the issue. Other excuses brought up by the federalists against the issue of the Louisiana purchase were the threat that the, now bordering, Spanish now posed against the United States due to the standing army that Spain had, and because it would “destroy with a single operation the whole weight and importance of the eastern states”. Despite the opposition by the federalists, Jefferson was able to pass the Louisiana Purchase in congress, as the benefits of the extreme bargain far outweighed the excuses that the federalists were offering; thus, giving many citizens the hoped of a new beginning in the west and the start of the westward expansion. Although the war of 1812 did not acquire more land for the United States, it helped to clear the way for expansion by removing the British from United States territory, thus clearing the way for American expansion. Not only did the war remove the British but it also led to the demise of the Federalist…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Louisiana Purchase was of huge importance to the United States because it secured more trade opportunities. When President Thomas Jefferson purchased the land from France for only $15 million, it was for Jefferson’s own idea of how the U.S. should be. The purchase gave the United States access to the Mississippi river and to New Orleans, so that no other country could close it off and threaten the trade of the United States. The purchase was meant to strengthen the U.S’s trade with the other European countries and in the West Indies. By having control of the river, the United States no longer needed to or would have to pay customs to export their products to the rest of the world. President Jefferson also wanted the U.S. to be primarily an agrarian republic made up of white land owning men, because he felt that urban…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jefferson, for example, could not immediately abolish Adams' national bank because it would be too drastic a move for someone with his popularity, despite the fact that it was established without the Constitution granting that power to the federal government (Blum). Jefferson's most grand defiance of his strict interpretation of the Constitution was his purchase of the Louisiana Territory. Even though he was not given the power to purchase land in the Constitution, Jefferson couldn't pass up the opportunity to double the nation's size at a time of such large-scale westward movement. After his presidency (1816), Jefferson wrote a letter to Samuel Kercheval (document G) that gave his support for change to the Constitution with change to the times, which is a very far leap from claiming that nothing could be done in the national government without the Constitution granting them the power to do it. Madison is guilty of the same deviations from typical Republican strict constructionist policy. He was attacked by John Randolph (document F) for being too much like a Federalist, particularly when using the national government's power to set tariffs like the one proposed in 1816. This was not the first time Madison was attacked for his pseudo-Federalist policies. He received abundant criticisms…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Robert Livingston and James Monroe returned from Paris with the 1803 Louisiana Territory Purchase Treaty, President Thomas Jefferson was faced with a dilemma. Jefferson had sent Monroe to Paris to negotiate the purchase of New Orleans for $2 million. A treaty selling the United States all of the territory was another matter and posed Constitutional issues for the leader of a party that believed in strict construction (interpretation) of the Constitution. Jefferson and the Congress had already authorized the Lewis and Clark Expedition, but not with the intent of owning the vast lands.…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Starting in the years 1801-1817 there was a separation in the United States. The Federalists and Dem-Rep parties were basically opposites of each other. The Republicans were usually seen as strict constructionists, who opposed the broad constructionism of both Jefferson and Madison who were Federalists. In both, Jefferson’s and Madison’s presidencies they highlighted Federalists ideals in their decisions, including Jefferson’s purchase of the Louisiana territory.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jeffersonian Republicans were often portrayed as strict constructionalists and the Federalists were considered broad constructionalists, but this characterization was untrue in many ways. Between 1801 and 1817 their primary beliefs on economics, military, and the judicial branch seemed to change completely.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With respect to the federal Constitution, the Democratic-Republicans were usually characterized as strict constructionists who were opposed to the broad constructionism of the Federalists. As history dictates, this is substantially accurate. In the time frame of 1801-1817, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, the Republican presidents of the time, demonstrated the differences of the Republican Party in several aspects involving the interpretation of the Constitution. The Democratic-Republicans believed that the government should follow a strict interpretation of the Constitution and held the idea that this would allow honest representation of the people and prevent government corruption. However, the Federalists were firm believers in the production of a strong central government and a broad interpretation of the Constitution.…

    • 1140 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the early stages of the United States, two political parties emerged disagreeing with each other of who should have the power and what kind of government the nation should be composed of. The Federalist party wanted a strong national government and was thought to have a loose interpretation of the Constitution through the Elastic Clause. Onthe other hand, the Jeffersonian Republican party maintained that the states should retain the power and thought that the Elastic clause allowed the national govt too much power. They were know as the strict constructionists. Although the Republicans maintained this characterization at the beginning, the two parties exchanged their roles with each other during the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison, either because of certain political and foreign circumstances or ironically to make sure that the other party loses its power.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Citizens of the United States were found to be divided into two separate political groups during the ratification of the United States Constitution. The first group, the Federalist Party, having a nationalistic view, favored a strong central government, restricting powers of the states. However, the Republican Party believed that the power of the national government should be limited and the states be given additional power. Many different issues occurred between the two parties, however the debate on the first national bank, the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798, and the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions of 1798, establish why the republican party adopted these views on the government. The republican party felt that definite rights should be reserved by…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Document B, in 1791, Jefferson’s opinion of the National Bank was a rather negative one. He professed his beliefs that the bank went against the constitution and gave too much power to the federal government. He…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hamilton and Jefferson represented different interests that would come to define the priorities of the nation's 1st political parties (Thomas 10). These two-party political systems were impacted by domestic and foreign affairs. Hamilton and Jefferson had different interests that would define the priorities of the nation's first political parties. The Federalists and Antifederalists division took place during the debates over ratification of the constitution (Sisung 2). The Federalists were more centralized, and they could keep their name as the Federalists because they were much more modest. They were known as those who only looked up to the government and followed all their rules. The Anti-Federalists were decentralized and had a variety of names, Democratic Republicans, Republican, but were mostly called Jeffersonian Republicans. They believed in freedom and opposed the Constitution and federal government which was the total opposite of what the Federalists believe in.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first American political parties were crafted early in American history. Primarily economic issues shaped the fundamental Hamiltonian and Jeffersonian political positions during the George Washington and John Adams administrations, prior to Thomas Jefferson’s presidency. Washington more commonly agreed with the Federalist approach to government, he agreed with this approach with the Proclamation of Neutrality as well as his position on The Bank of the United States. Although George Washington condemned the existence of political factions, he was forced to agree with either one faction or another, due to the apparent economic, social, and foreign issues, including the French Revolution, America’s neutrality, and America’s economy overall.…

    • 1438 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jefferson and Madison

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the Nineteenth Century, the Federalist and Democratic – Republican parties were greatly opposed to one another. Democratic Republicans were strict constructionists and Federalists were loose constructionists. Although these two parties’ policies were extremely different, both Thomas Jefferson and James Madison presidencies would be defined by Federalist policies, even though they both were Democratic – Republicans.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays