Compare And Contrast Federalist And Democratic-Republicans

Good Essays
With many different views on how to run the government, it was hard to depict which parties’ group would be the strongest and the best fit to control the country: the Federalists’ or the Democratic-Republicans. The Federalists’ wanted a very strong government to bring together the bickering states. On the other hand, the Democratic-Republicans pictured more independent state governments to rule the people. Although they didn’t agree on many things they did have one idea in common, such as, both parties wanted to follow the Constitution, but in different ways. The Federalists’ envisioned a strong national government due to the fact that they thought humans were selfish. Alexander Hamilton, the leader of the Federalists, believed that a powerful, central government that use the rights protected in the Constitution would strengthen the state's. Moreover, Hamilton would rather have power in the capital than giving the states rights. “Real liberty is neither found in despotism or the extremes of democracy, but in moderate governments,” Hamilton remarked. In order to get the strong nation and government, he desired, Hamilton made a national bank to pay off taxes, print money, and to make loans. He also wanted to expand the economy to benefit business and trade. …show more content…
They both tried to make America a better and stronger country starting with the government. In the end, both ideas eventually helped form the government we have today all while uniting the country. Hamilton’s idea of a strong, central government evens out with Jefferson’s beliefs of independent state governments. While we still use both ideas of how the government should be ran, it’s really up to the people to decide which groups’ idea was stronger, better, and more thought out: the Federalist’s or the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The political party of the Federalist believed in a loose interpretation of the Constitution, however, the Democratic-Republicans believed in a strict interpretation. Alexander Hamilton, the leader of the Federalist party, believed that loosely interpreting the Constitution would help our new country prosper. Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, leaders of the Democratic-Republicans, believed that strictly interpreting the Constitution would protect our nation. Both had different views of how to…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalists and Democratic-Republicans are very different in the way they think and act. Federalists had a strong federal government and were ruled by a wealthy class while the Democratic republicans had a strong state government and were ruled by people On page 292 its states that " One difference between Federalists and Republicans concerned the basis of government power". It also states on page 292 " The Democratic-Republicans wanted to limit the government because they feared that a strong government…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thesis: It would appear that the assertion that Democratic-Republicans were strict interpreters of the Constitution while Federalists were not are only somewhat accurate. The Letter from Thomas Jefferson to Samuel Kercheval is of particular interest because Jefferson outright states “...I know also, that the laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind”. This is somewhat different from the traditional image of Jefferson interpreting the constitution as absolute…

    • 1298 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    government grew and the nation prospered, the rise of leaders and political figures came about and with this, conflicting principles and ideology spawned, thus creating the first of the political parties; the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans. Although the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans ideology and stances on the power of the federal government, domestic economic policies and the group of constituents they represented differed vastly, members of both parties often compromised their…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Republican side As new problems arose facing the new nation, many different views toward the new conflicts developed. Initially, Hamilton acted aggressively to deal with the new republic's financial troubles with proposals to fund the national debt, create a central banking system and uniform currency, and promote manufacturing with a high protective tariff. Jefferson opposed these policies, objecting to the concentration of power in the hands of bankers and currency speculators. Jefferson believed…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalist vs. Republican-Democratic Back when George Washington was first elected president, there were no political parties. Soon after, in 1796, the Federalist party, founded by Alexander Hamilton, and the Democratic-Republican party, founded by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, were formed. The point of these parties was to form alliances with those who share the same beliefs as you. If you wanted something done with the country, you needed some help, and joining a political party is just the…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans, fought many ideological and political battles from 1790 to 1810. Conflicts between these two parties grew out of their opposing ideologies the Democratic-Republicans supported states rights and a strict interpretation of the U.S. Constitution, whereas the Federalists favored a strong central government and a broader interpretation of the Constitution. However there are more than 3 major topics that I could talk about involving the Federalist and Democratic-Republicans…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Constitutional Characterizations of Federalists and Democratic Republicans Throughout time, in reference to the constitution, Jeffersonian Democratic Republicans have been stereotyped as strict constructionists, while Federalists as lose interpreters. The true test of these assumptions is revealed throughout the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison, two leading figures of these two political parties. Although Jefferson advocated strict interpretation of the Constitution in his speech his…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    parties of Democratic Republican and Federalists extended both strict and loose characterizations of the constitution, that shows the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison were not as much of a stereotype. The Democratic Republicans had many ways of being strict through the constitution and a couple ways of being loose. Along with the Democratic Republicans the Federalists were more strict than loose when it came to the constitution and together both the Democratic Republicans and Federalists shows hoe…

    • 798 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1801 and 1817, the two parties the Jeffersonian Republicans and Federalists seemed to have changed their views on the issue of whether the constitution should be loosely interpreted, or strictly interpreted. The Democratic-Republicans originally prided themselves in having strict constructionist beliefs, but however, as time went on, they seemed to have adopted a broader outlook. The Federalists, who favored a looser perspective on the interpretation of the construction, adopted a more strict…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays