Preview

Jeffersonian Republicans Vs Federalists Dbq Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
839 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Jeffersonian Republicans Vs Federalists Dbq Essay
Throughout the 1800's, Jeffersonian Republicans thought that the federal government’s power was confined to the grants of the Constitution. On the other hand, the Federalists believed in the broad construction that gave the government any power that was not forbidden by the constitution. Despite the fact that the Jeffersonian Republicans believe in a strict interpretation of the Constitution, and Federalists believe in a loose interpretation, these beliefs were misrepresented according to the party’s views on the authority of the government during the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison. During this time, the Jeffersonian Republicans beliefs were inverted with the beliefs of the Federalists. The Jeffersonian Republicans leaned toward a loose interpretation and the Federalists leaned toward a strict one.
The ideal society of Jefferson and his followers varied greatly to the federalists’ ideal society. The Jeffersonian Republicans wanted their society to have a central government that barely controlled the lives of the independent farmers. They preferred to have a strong state government. The sole purpose of the government was to protect one’s liberties that the Constitution granted. Jefferson expresses his ideal society in
…show more content…
In fact, he created the Embargo Act of 1808 in effort to prevent war. The Embargo Act did not allow ships to leave the port for any foreign destination, which would prevent them from provoking fights with hostile ships. This led to a period of economic depression. Document C displays a cartoon, “OGRABME, or The American Snapping-turtle.”, created by Alexander Anderson that is against the Embargo Act of 1808. The hatred of the act caused the third suggested amendment at the Harvard Convention on January 4, 1815. It stated, “ Congress shall not have the power to lay any embargo on the ships or vessels of the citizens of the United States,…for more than sixty days.” (Document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    By 1817 the great American experiment was in full swing. America was developing into an effective democratic nation. However as the democracy continued to grow, two opposing political parties developed, the Jeffersonian Republicans and the Federalists. The Jeffersonian Republicans believed in strong state governments, a weak central government, and a strict interpretation of the Constitution. The Federalists saw it differently. They opted for a powerful central government with weaker state governments, and a loose interpretation of the Constitution. The seemingly solid divide between Federalist and Republican would begin to blur during the presidencies of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. For, neither Republican president was able lead the nation with purely republican ideals.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The different biased policies of which Federalists believed in interpreting the Constitution broadly, while Jeffersonian Republicans (Anti-Feds) believed it should be interpreted strictly, continued through the presidencies of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. However, throughout both of their terms, both parties eventually “switched” their ideals, and followed the other party’s belief. “Our country is too large to have all its affairs directed by a singled government” (Doc. A) is a letter from Jefferson to Granger, then the complete opposite is written in Doc F, where Randolph talks about how the J. Republicans abandon their original principles. This is just one example of how later the two parties ideals were “switched.” Actions such as the Louisiana Purchase, the Embargo Act, and the establishment of the Second National Bank show this.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the years of 1801-1817 the Democratic-Republicans held back on their strict views of the constitution but did hold true to some of their basic beliefs. This can be seen during the presidency of Thomas Jefferson. Before being elected president, in a letter to one of his future cabinet members, Gideon Granger, Jefferson explained that, "the country was too large" to be "directed by a single government" (A). Jefferson also stated that it was best for the nation if the "states are independent" (A). Jefferson did not believe that the federal government should hold the most power in the nation and feared the birth of a monarchy. This letter demonstrates that Jefferson was true to his beliefs during this time in that he…

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With respect to the federal Constitution, the Democratic-Republicans were usually characterized as strict constructionists who were opposed to the broad constructionism of the Federalists. As history dictates, this is substantially accurate. In the time frame of 1801-1817, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, the Republican presidents of the time, demonstrated the differences of the Republican Party in several aspects involving the interpretation of the Constitution. The Democratic-Republicans believed that the government should follow a strict interpretation of the Constitution and held the idea that this would allow honest representation of the people and prevent government corruption. However, the Federalists were firm believers in the production of a strong central government and a broad interpretation of the Constitution.…

    • 1140 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the election of 1800, the Democratic-Republican candidate, Thomas Jefferson, was elected as president. Well-known as a supporter of states rights and an agrarian society, Jefferson felt the need to reduce the differences between the two parties and did much to accomplish this through his two terms. Although Jefferson was elected as a Democratic-Republican, through his term he adopted many Federalist's views in order to do what was best for the common good. In a way, Jefferson did out-federalize the federalists by taking their arguments he felt were strong enough to be supported by the public and were best for the common good.…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As new problems arose facing the new nation, many different views toward the new conflicts developed. Initially, Hamilton acted aggressively to deal with the new republic's financial troubles with proposals to fund the national debt, create a central banking system and uniform currency, and promote manufacturing with a high protective tariff. Jefferson opposed these policies, objecting to the concentration of power in the hands of bankers and currency speculators. Jefferson believed that an economy dominated by small farmers, not manufacturers, would best preserve republican values. Hamilton believed in a strong central government while Jefferson believed in States’ Rights. Hamilton believed, “United States becoming a commercial and industrial empire, a world power remarkable for its ability to balance individual freedom with government power” (Tindall). Jefferson believed that an agriculture based society would better protect the civil liberties of the Americans. He feared that the growth of cities would enrich the aristocracy and widen divisions between the rich and poor, just as it has today.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although Jefferson often showed a strong dislike for the Federalist laws and programs, when he took office he left many of the Federalist programs intact, and except for revoking the excise tax, the Hamiltonian system was mostly left as it was. However, this act of Jefferson’s went against many of the political beliefs held by his party and himself. Jefferson and Hamilton’s philosophies differed greatly in that Jefferson adhered to a weak central government, with most of the power in the hands of the states. He believed that the federal government’s power should be restrained and limited, so that it would not be able to become tyrannical or try and undermine the power of the states and the people.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Jefferson led his party known as the Jeffersonian Republicans. The Jeffersonian Republicans supported the idea of government ruled by informed men, believed in a strong state government, wanted to cultivate an economy by cultivating crops, and followed the U.S. Constitution verbatim. Jefferson’s party too had an opinion on the French Revolution.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    James Madison and Alexander Hamilton were some of the many Federalists of the time. They believed that a stronger centralized government should be established. Federalists believed that “[in] [a] republican government, the legislative authority necessarily predominates.” They had a very strong attitude about a government ruling over the people. They also said that “[in] framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself.” They wanted to control everything, unlike the anti-federalists that believed that the power should be given to the states in order to create a better government for the people.…

    • 515 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both the Federalists and Anti-Federalists, had disparate visions about how the country should be administered, which would cause a complication with our founding fathers, who formulated a way to run the country. Federalists assumed to have a forceful central government, central bank. Federalists presumed that in a government, checks and balance works out, so there is no tension between individuals. With Federalists, they remained with the strong central governments, whereas the Anti- Federalists wanted to remain with the British government. In the Anti- Federalists, they always thought that the army would cause great destruction. Centinel No 1, states that "The Congress may construe every purpose for which the state legislatures now lay taxes,…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hearing about political parties, Washington was not too keen on the idea. Conversely, he was part of the uprising of the first two political parties. Federalists and Democratic-Republicans, previously named anti-federalists, were the two different political organizations. The first two parties to evolve were very different regarding beliefs of the common people, views of the government, their stances on the foreign policy, and ways to manage finances.…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Two competing political philosophies have always existed throughout the United States’ relatively short history: one seeking to increase the power of the central government, and one seeking to decrease it. During the 1800s these two conflicting philosophies were acted out by the Federalist and the Democratic Republican parties, respectively. The Federalists, led by Alexander Hamilton, advocated the importance of a strong central government in leading the country forward, while the Democratic Republicans, led by Thomas Jefferson, promoted increasing the common man’s role in government. Although both political parties had good intentions for the future of the United States, the Federalist Party was much more effective at uniting the American people, avoiding domestic faction, and keeping the best interests in mind for the future of the United States.…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first major divide between the Federalists and the Democratic Republicans was over socioeconomic issues. The Federalists believed that the country should be led by the best people, who they viewed as the educated elite.1 They argued that only the highly educated could make informed decisions about important political decisions and that extending the vote to the many would result in mob rule, a disruption of the status quo, and ruin for the country.2 On the other hand, the Democratic Republican Party believed that the country's leadership should be in the hands of the informed many. Like the Federalists they did not want to extend the vote to the mob, but they believed that common men could lead the country effectively once sufficiently informed.3 In addition, the Federalists and the Democratic Republicans differed over the relative importance of business and agriculture. The Federalists supported business, including shipbuilding, trade, and the infant manufacturing that was developing in urban centers. As…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Embargo Act was a general Embargo which made exports illegal in the United states…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    APUSH Example Long Essay

    • 594 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the early ages of the American society, there were two major parties that were the factions of society. They were led by Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson. Both held different values regarding the amount of power, and influence government should have upon society. Hamilton’s group, whose people are known as Hamiltonians, believed in a strong central government, earning them the title of Federalists. Jefferson’s group on the other hand, believed in state’s rights, and for states to hold more control within their jurisdictions. This group would be known as the Democratic - Republican Party. These two parties both differed ideologically about how to best run the country. The two most major ways they disagreed were in political philosophy, and their outlooks on our county’s economic and social future.…

    • 594 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays