IT Management

Topics: Knowledge management, Knowledge, Tacit knowledge Pages: 31 (4227 words) Published: March 15, 2014
Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning

3
4

William R. King
Katz Graduate School of Business, University of Pittsburgh
wking115@yahoo.com

For centuries, scientists, philosophers and intelligent laymen have been concerned about creating, acquiring, and communicating knowledge and improving the re-utilization of knowledge. However, it is only in the last 15–20 years or so that a distinct field called “knowledge management” (KM) has emerged.

KM is based on the premise that, just as human beings are unable to draw on the full potential of their brains, organizations are generally not able to fully utilize the knowledge that they possess. Through KM, organizations seek to acquire or create potentially useful knowledge and to make it available to those who can use it at a time and place that is appropriate for them to achieve maximum effective usage in order to positively influence organizational performance. It is generally believed that if an organization can increase its effective knowledge utilization by only a small percentage, great benefits will result.

Organizational learning (OL) is complementary to KM. An early view of OL was “…encoding inferences from history into routines that guide behavior” (Levitt and March, 1988, p. 319). So, OL has to do with embedding what has been learned into the fabric of the organization.

1

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

The Basics of Knowledge Management
and Organizational Learning

To understand KM and OL, one must understand knowledge, KM processes and goals and 21 22
knowledge management systems (KMS).
1.1

Knowledge

23

Knowledge is often defined as a “justified personal belief.” There are many taxonomies that specify various kinds of knowledge. The most fundamental distinction is between “tacit” and “explicit” knowledge. Tacit knowledge inhabits the minds of people and is (depending on one’s interpretation of Polanyi’s (1966) definition) either impossible, or difficult, to articulate. Most knowledge is initially tacit in nature; it is laboriously developed over a long period of time through trial and error, and it is underutilized because “the organization does not know what it knows” (O’Dell and Grayson, 1998, p. 154). Some knowledge is embedded in business processes, activities, and relationships that have been created over time through the implementation of a continuing series of improvements.

W.R. King (ed.), Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning, Annals of Information Systems 4,
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-0011-1_1, © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

3

24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32

4
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53

Explicit knowledge exists in the form of words, sentences, documents, organized data, computer programs and in other explicit forms. If one accepts the useful “difficult-to-articulate” concept of tacit knowledge, a fundamental problem of KM is to explicate tacit knowledge and then to make it available for use by others.

One can also distinguish among “know what,” “know how” and “know why” levels of knowledge.
“Know what,” knowledge specifies what action to take when one is presented with a set of stimuli. For instance, a salesperson who has been trained to know which product is best suited for various situations has a “know-what” level of knowledge. The next higher level of knowledge is “know-how” – i.e., knowing how to decide on an appropriate response to a stimulus. Such knowledge is required when the simple programmable relationships between stimuli and responses, which are the essence of “know-what” knowledge, are inadequate. This might be the case, for instance, when there is considerable “noise” in symptomatic information so that the direct link between symptoms and a medical diagnosis is uncertain. “Know how”-type knowledge permits a professional to determine which treatment or action is best, even in...

References: Cross, R., and L. Baird. (2000). “Technology is not enough: Improving performance by building organizational memory,” Sloan Management Review, 41(3): 69–79.
Davenport, T.H., and L. Prusak. 2000. Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they
know
Dixon, N.M. 1994. The organizational learning cycle: How we can learn collectively. New York:
McGraw-Hill.
Earl, M. 2001. Knowledge management strategies. Journal of Management Information Systems
18(1): 215–223.
Easterby-Smith, M., and M. Lyles. 2003. The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and
knowledge management
Hansen, M.T., N. Nohria, and T. Tierney. 1999. What’s your strategy for managing knowledge?
Harvard Business Review 77(2): 106–116.
Huber, G.P. 1991. Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization
Science 2(1): 88–115.
King, W.R. 2005. Communications and information processing as a critical success factor in the effective
knowledge organization
King, W.R. 2006a. In “Knowledge sharing”: The encyclopedia of knowledge management, D.G.
King, W.R. 2006b. In “Knowledge transfer”: The encyclopedia of knowledge management, ed. D.G.
King, W.R. 2008. An integrated architecture for the effective knowledge organization. Journal of
Knowledge Management 12(2): 1367–1380.
King, W.R., and D.-G. Ko. 2001. Evaluating knowledge management and the learning organization:
An information/knowledge value chain approach
King, W.R., and W. Lekse. 2006. Deriving managerial benefit from knowledge search: A paradigm
shift? Information and Management 43(7): 874–883.
King, W.R., P. Marks, and S. McCoy. 2002. The most important issues in knowledge management.
Lee, G.K., and R.E. Cole. 2003. From a firm-based to a community-based model of knowledge creation: The case of the Linux Kernel development. Organization Science: A Journal of the Institute
of Management Sciences 14(6): 633.
Levitt, B., and J.G. March. 1988. Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology 14: 319–340.
McDonald, D.W., and M.S. Ackerman. 1997. Collaborative refinery: A collaborative information
workspace for the World Wide Web., Technical Report 97-03 Irvine: Information and Computer
Menon, T., and J. Pfeffer. 2003. Valuing internal vs. external knowledge explaining the preference for
outsiders
Nonaka, I. 1994. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organizational Science
5(1): 14–37.
O’Dell, C., and C.J. Grayson. 1998. If only we knew what we know: identification and transfer of
internal best practices
Oliver, S., and K.R. Kandadi. 2006. How to develop knowledge culture in organizations? A multiple
case study of large distributed organizations
Polanyi, M. 1966. The tacit dimension. New York: Doubleday.
Van de Ven, A.H. 2005. Running in packs to develop knowledge-intensive technologies. MIS Quarterly
29(2): 365–378.
Ward, J., and A. Aurum. 2004. Knowledge management in software engineering – Describing the
process, 137–146., 15th Australian Software Engineering Conference (ASWEC 2004) Melbourne,
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Knowledge Management Essay
  • What Is Knowledge Management Essay
  • Knowledge Management Essay
  • Essay on Strategic Management
  • Essay on Knowledge Management
  • Knowledge Management Essay
  • Assignment
  • Essay about The Environmental Effects of the Management

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free