One of the main places of weakness was the fact that there was no middle answer, or “gray area”. The test forces the test taker to choose between two completely opposite choices and does not give a choice of compromise. Many people like myself would have chosen to compromise between the opposing viewpoints instead of strictly choosing one side in favor of the other. Not only was the test too specific, but there were not enough questions to accurately decide exactly where a person can fall on the spectrum of the four ideologies. One of the main things I know about politics, is that it is the art of doing what is possible at the moment given the circumstances. As most of us know, anything is possible, so a mere set twenty questions would not be even close to covering everything there is about
One of the main places of weakness was the fact that there was no middle answer, or “gray area”. The test forces the test taker to choose between two completely opposite choices and does not give a choice of compromise. Many people like myself would have chosen to compromise between the opposing viewpoints instead of strictly choosing one side in favor of the other. Not only was the test too specific, but there were not enough questions to accurately decide exactly where a person can fall on the spectrum of the four ideologies. One of the main things I know about politics, is that it is the art of doing what is possible at the moment given the circumstances. As most of us know, anything is possible, so a mere set twenty questions would not be even close to covering everything there is about