Preview

Federalist Vs Anti Federalism Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
550 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Federalist Vs Anti Federalism Essay
Government can be a complicated system to understand, but one thing I have come to notice is it either you are for something or you are against something. One that is known to many is either the Federalist or the Anti-Federalist. To be considered a Federalist, they want a strong national government and were all for the approval of the Constitution to aid the debt and tensions. To be consider an Anti- Federalist, they were people who opposed a strong federal government and were for the Article of Confederation instead. They preferred for the power to remain in the state and local governments. Some major points of disagreement between the Federalist and Antifederalist visions of the United States were central government and important documents. …show more content…
Federalist want a strong central government because it favored the high class which threatened the state and the common man power that was equally given. In the reading I came to the conclusion that Federalist wanted to increase tax so they could pay for the war that just happen. The taxes and power threaten the common man. Which in a since I do not think is wrong because the war did do a toll on America. Just like stated before Federalist want to strengthen government, and one important person that was in the government was John Marshall. John Marshall, a federalist, “serve as chief justice for several decades and be credited in later years with establishing a strong national judiciary that supported strong actions by the central government to bind the states to federal authority (Frohnen 1803).” He believed in everything that the Federalist believe and was a major influence.
While the Anti-Federalist, wanted the state and local governments to have more power compared to the central government. The Anti-Federalist wanted more power to the local people like the farmers to have a say. This is important as well because not everyone is made of money so people that do have the struggle should have a say as

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Federalists argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights, because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government. Anti-Federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty. For the Federalists, Both Hamilton and Madison argued that the Constitution didn't need a Bill of Rights, that it would create a "parchment barrier" that limited the rights of the people, as opposed to protecting them. In the ratification debate, the Anti Federalists opposed to the Constitution. They complained that the new system threatened liberties, and failed to protect individual rights. The Anti-Federalists weren't exactly a united group, but instead involved many elements. One faction opposed the Constitution because they thought stronger government threatened the sovereignty of the states. Others argued that a new centralized government would have all the characteristics of the despotism of Great Britain they had fought so hard to remove themselves from. And still others feared that the new government threatened their personal…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federalist were who argued for a strong national government to provide order and protect rights of people and claimed that the bill of rights was unnecessary. On the other hand the Anti- Federalist argued for a weak national government and wanted to add the Bill of Rights to protect the people against abuses of power. A number…

    • 3046 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Anti-Federalists restricted approval of the Constitution and favored the adjustment of power being with the states. They trusted that a capable national government would wind up being overbearing and there will be loss of flexibility, higher assessments, and no power for state laws or courts. The fundamental worry for the Anti-Federalists in the Federalist paper #10 was fairness rights for the general population. It is the reason they affirmed of Article 4, since they bolstered the privileges of the general population and having full confidence and credit given to the states influenced them to feel that the privileges of the states would be maintained. The Anti-Federalists battled for the restriction of ratification in the Constitution just…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A collection of essays called, The Federalist, were published in 1787 and 1788 and basically supported the ratification of the constitution and the idea of a national authority without the fear of tyranny in the new government. The anti-federalists responded to this with what they considered to be the dangers of a more powerful central government.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Government

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Federalist number 70 quote says “All men of sense will agree in the necessity of an energetic executive … The ingredients which constitute energy in the executive are unity; duration; an adequate provision for its support; and competent powers.” Which means that the anti-federalists wanted to prevent what was people’s rights being taken by groups of special interests. Another problem with the federalists is that they didn’t want the states to have the right to secede.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalist and Antifederalist had different ideas and beliefs of the nation’s government. Antifederalist believed in more power for the states and did not agree with a strong central government. They preferred the Articles of Confederation. Antifederalist did not want to ratify the Constitution due the fact there was no bill of rights and there was too much power in the national Constitution and not the States. On the other hand, Federalist believed in a more centralized national government. Federalist propose the separation of powers, which the act of vesting the legislative, executive, and judicial powers of government in separate bodies.…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Powers of the national government were not well defined in the constitution. The Anti-Federalists opposed this, and they also took issue with the elastic and supremacy clause which they felt could give the national government the power to increase its own power. The Anti-Federalists wanted more defined powers of the national government in the Constitution.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    U.S Constitution DBQ

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The writing of the U.S Constitution generated many concerns over the amount of power to be allowed in the Federal Government. Political parties of Federalists and Antifederalists formed, sparking debate over the issue. As Federalists supported the proposed U.S Constitution, Antifederalists supported the government formed under the Articles of Confederation. Federalists felt that a strong central government would give protection to public and private credit. Many large landowners, judges, lawyers, leading clergymen, political figures, and merchants were in favor of ratifying the U.S Constitution. James Madison writes in Federalist Papers #10, “Complaints are everywhere heard from our most considerate and virtuous citizens, equally the friends of public and private faith and public of personal liberty, that our governments are too unstable” (Doc. A). Congressmen such as Madison strongly supported a stronger Federal Government. The existing government under the Articles of Confederation needed to be altered to ensure more control over the states. Federalists believed that if change wasn’t made the nation would fail. “Either the…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federalist’s structure of government is superior to that of the Anti-Federalists because we have a better idea of how the government should be run. The Anti-Federalist’s want to include so many things that we do not need like a bill of rights, and a set number of representatives from each state.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the 1700’s, the first political parties formed over disagreements in the government. The two parties were the federalists and Antifederalists. Federalists made up the people who felt that the stronger government was better for the country and supported the Constitution. The federalists had felt as if different “fiscal and monetary policies” were a weakness for the national economy. Also, the federalists supported banking("Anti-Federalist vs Federalist"). Federalists wanted to fight for stronger governments, managing the country’s debt and ratification. Antifederalists were people who opposed the Constitution of 1788 and disagreed with a stronger federal government. The Antifederalists wanted to keep the power to be for states and local…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The federalists and anti-federalists had a very intense debate during the ratification of the constitution. Both sides had to make several compromises in order to be able to do something better for the people. I myself agree more with the views of the anti-federalists. They believed that the power should be shared by the states in order for things to be fair. If the Federal government had all the power, chaos would rule our way of life. The individual rights and shared power is what makes things flow smooth in our government.…

    • 515 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    First, anti-federalists argue that republican government is best within a small territory, governing a small group of people for logistical reasons; it is difficult for large populations to be active in their government and receive the benefits thereof. This objection was enumerated in one of the first Anti-Federalist writings, by The Federal Farmer. He wrote: “Independent of the opinions of many great authors, that a free elective government cannot be…

    • 1711 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first Anti-federalist movement of the 18th century was against The Anti-federalists in the 1780 's opposed the creation of a stronger national government under the Constitution. There were different reasons for this opposition; they believed that a stronger government would threaten the sovereignty of the states and individuals. In addition, the Anti-federalist believed that the existing government was sufficient and getting a national government under the constitution would be too strong. The Anti-federalists believed in free trade, a government controlled by ordinary citizens, policies that were favorable to…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They divided their power within everyone else. Especially when it came to the division of the powers between the legislative, judicial, and the executive branches that would avoid any President from becoming a person with complete higher power. “The separation of powers and elaborate series of checks and balances that the Constitution created, as well as the system of federalism itself, reflects fear. The Federalists divided power; unlike the Antifederalists, they did not.” The Federalists believed in and supported the idea of government. They believed in the source of Majority Rule. They took everyone’s opinion in to consideration. Therefore, in the end it was all a success, all of the troubles that the Federalists had to go through were worth…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution of the United States is what many people consider the back bone of our nation. It was written in a time of need, when the federal government could not lead the country to the promise of a truly developed nation. Now, in 2016, 227 years later, this document still stands and makes sure our government does its job correctly and efficiently for the persons in their country. Although the Constitution became official, this did not happen without the compromise of the Federalists and the Anti-federalists. These two sides had their say, yet they came to terms and both acquired what they wanted in the Constitution.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays