Preview

Intestacy Notes

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
8217 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Intestacy Notes
Topic: Introduction to the law of intestacy.

Students must be able to:

|LOS 1 |describe the evolution of the rules of intestacy. |
|LOS 2 |distinguish between total intestacy and partial intestacy. |
|LOS 3 |understand essential terms used in the law relating to testacy and intestacy. |

LOS 1

Distriution of Real Property before 1926 Rules of inheritance dictated that real property (realty) passed to the heir-at-law who was the eldest son. If there were no surviving sons or their issue, realty devolved equally on the daughters of the intestate. The order in which the realty passed is as follows: i. Eldest son or issue; ii. Other sons or issue; iii. Daughters equally or issue; iv. Brothers and sisters or issue.

After the Inheritance Act 1833 came into force, the intestate’s parents were given priority over collaterals. If there were no next of kin, realty passed to the intestate’s lord or the Crown. Intestate’s widow was not entitled but the widower took life interest in the whole of his wife’s real property (an interest known as curtesy). Under the customary rules of dower, the widow came to be entitled to 1/3 of her husband’s real property on his death. Both curtesy and dower faded in importance as methods were found to defeat these customary rights.

Distribution of Personal Property before 1926 Statute’s of Distribution 1670-1685 - the widow took 1/3 of personal property (personalty) if there were issue, but 1/2 if there were no issue. A widower was entitled to all of his wife’s personalty. If there was no surviving spouse, the issue took all the personalty. Other next of kin could take if there were no issue. The Crown was

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Mr. Barney Case Study

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One of the three legal issues Mr. Barney is facing includes the investment of mountain home that he owns with three of his friends as joint tenants with right of survivorship. A law states that “The interests of the grantees holding property in joint tenancy with right of survivorship shall be deemed to be equal unless otherwise specified in the conveyance” (North Carolina g.s. § 41-2). This explains that when someone is under a joint tenancy with the right of survivorship and during that period if one of the owner dies, the other joint tenants get that owner’s portion in the property regardless of the deceased owner’s will or the rule of interstate succession (Lewis, 2011). In Mr. Barney’s case, one of his friends, Andy dies and his will showed interest of the property which is owned with three friends to his son, Opie. According to the law explained above, Opie is not entitled to become an owner or the partner of this property and therefore, Mr. Barney is not legally liable for the defaulted loan nor can the bank foreclose the property. As…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hodel Vs Irving Summary

    • 4767 Words
    • 20 Pages

    The whole idea is that where a decedent’s heir is not living, that heir’s descendants take in his stead. In per stirpital distribution, spouses of heirs are not relevant. When an heir is living, their children are irrelevant. (DUH)…

    • 4767 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    State Intestacy Case Study

    • 3050 Words
    • 13 Pages

    State intestacy laws usually do not provide for asset transfers ro non-relared parries, including rhe surviving…

    • 3050 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    You and your husband are married for two years living in community property state with a prenuptial agreement declaring that all the property owned is a separate property. You came to seek for advice to accomplish your financial objectives. Being able to retire when you reach age 65 is your priority. On the other hand ability to minimize death tax at the death of the first spouse and the death of the second spouse and provide adequate liquidity for each of your estates are important factors you would like to plan and possible accomplish in the future.…

    • 1435 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    APUSH Summer Assignment

    • 3956 Words
    • 16 Pages

    SIG: In the 18th and 19th centuries dower rights were not given much attention. In 1945, dower was abolished but some states still allowed bits of property to be given to a widow.…

    • 3956 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    How should this be conveyed? What interests should he give to whom? What kind of remainder interests and tenancies should he give to the children? What type of deed is necessary for this conveyance?…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    James V. Taylor

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages

    FACTS: Eula Mae Redmon conveyed certain real estate to her children, W. C. Sewell, Billy Sewell, and Melba Taylor, by means of a January 1993 deed. The deed recited that the property was conveyed to the three grantees "jointly and severally, and unto their heirs, assigns, and successors forever," subject to a life estate retained by Mrs. Redmon. W. C. Sewell died in November 1993. Billy Sewell died two years later. After Mrs. Redmon passed away in 1997, Melba Taylor filed a declaratory judgment action in which she asked the court to rule that her mother had intended to convey the property to the three grantees as joint tenants and that Taylor, by virtue of her brothers' deaths, had become sole owner of the property under the right of survivorship. Descendants of W. C. and Billy Sewell (referred to hereinafter as "the Sewell descendants") opposed Taylor's request. They contended that Mrs. Redmon's deed created a tenancy in common, and that they had succeeded to the ownership interests W. C. and Billy Sewell held prior to their deaths.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    French Revolution Dbq

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages

    commoners. People in the third Estate, commoners, had to work and pay tax, whereas the…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Was Hammurabi Unjust

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This is unjust because although he still has to care for her,there is no respect towards the ill wife considering she is dying and the man has already remarried. Second of all, the property laws are unjust. Law 48 says that if a man gets…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 9 outline

    • 3964 Words
    • 16 Pages

    The clergy was the First Estate; the nobility the Second Estate; and everyone else, from the wealthiest…

    • 3964 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. What taxes were placed on the Colonists? Do you think the British had the right to tax the…

    • 439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Family Law Study Notes

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Wife received the homestead valued at $74,000 with a mortgage of $26,000. Husband received real property to satisfy debts valued at $53,500, he also has to pay $1,000 per month to creditors of the family. Wife could sell homestead but what happens at 57 years old when she has no more support?…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Last Will and Testimate

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I give all the rest, residue, and remainder of my estate, real, personal, or mixed, of whatever kind and wherever located, after the payment of debts, expenses, and taxes, as mentioned in Article I, and after transfer of my community property mentioned in Article II, subject to the laws of this state regarding community property, to my wife Elizabeth O. Smith, if she survives me. If she does not survive me, I give said residue to my children, John J. Smith Jr., Elizabeth O. Smith, and Bobby Smith.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A will is a document that states how a person intends to distribute their property and assets after their death, on many occasions during a marriage, spouses will write wills that leave property for their spouse. Under Section 13 of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW), a divorce or an annulment of a testator’s marriage will deem any beneficial disposition for the former spouse to be void. The presence of this section can be incredibly effective as spouses may pass before getting the opportunity to amend their wills. As wills are made in anticipation of the marriage, the Succession Act ensures that the change in the relationship status reflects how the will is handled in the event that the testator passes before they are able to change their will. This ultimately achieves justice for the testator for it is highly likely that they would not have wanted their previous spouse to have inherited their property as they are no longer in a relationship.…

    • 1148 Words
    • 33 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rules of Consideration

    • 2516 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Majorie McArdle carried out certain improvements and repairs on a bungalow. The bungalow formed part of the estate of her husband's father who had died leaving the property to his wife for life and then on trust for Majorie's husband and his four siblings. After the work had been carried out the brothers and sisters signed a document stating in consideration of you carrying out the repairs we agree that the executors pay you £480 from the proceeds of sale. However, the payment was never made.…

    • 2516 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics